- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: Aug 15, 2008
User Score
5.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 40 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 22 out of 40
-
Mixed: 5 out of 40
-
Negative: 13 out of 40
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
OliverRMay 4, 200910I Thought it was very Jumpy, and a great film to watch in the dark, why all these bad reviews?
-
-
RobertD.Aug 15, 20089Excellent movie, Kiefer Sutherland was great, the story slacked a little near the end, but otherwise fantastic!
-
-
Padme'Jan 15, 20107A enjoyable movie and very underrated which fullfills its purpose very well, recommended viewing.
-
-
ArjanD.Oct 5, 20081Horrible B-horror movie that has to compensate the lack of atmosphere and a decent story with huge amounts of blood and gore...
-
-
EdwinR.Sep 12, 200810Really good movie.
-
-
RobbieBFeb 2, 20098This movie was good, not GREAT! But good, I thought Kiefer was pretty good. And that jaw-ripping part scared the crap out of me! Even with Amy Smart nude, I still couldn't keep my eyes off the jaw, instead of where other people were paying attention to. Overall, it's a good movie. It's been awhile since I sat down and enjoyed a GOOD horror film.
-
-
JordanNov 15, 20082This movie was uttely pointless and a waste of an attractive cast's talents. The script is garbage and the acting could be a lot better.
-
-
AmyC.Oct 17, 20082
-
-
MarkYouDontNeedToknowAug 15, 20083Meh. It's a typical "horror" flick that has little-to-no sense. The characters are poorly developed and lacking in substance. Also, the jaw part was very unncessary, even though the gore was laughable at points.
-
-
MoooseChesserAug 17, 20087Very good movie. Not as good as The hills have eyes yet there were some parts that were pretty creepy. The jaw part was unexpected but I thought it added the gore to the movie. Overall, somewhat disappointing ending, but I thought it was worth the money for the ticket.
-
-
SteveA.Aug 25, 20089Kiefer was very good - plot a little thin but still enjoyable.
-
-
BrentA.Aug 30, 20089A good horror flick. Good acting and some surprising moments. Very entertaining movie. Much better then the critics say.
-
-
RichardRSep 1, 20081
-
-
PatrickD.Sep 8, 20082I'm so close to giving this a 1. It was a really bad movie with plot holes and other things I cant even begin to describe.
-
-
hellothereJan 13, 20092
-
-
mauriciolJan 22, 20097Very freeky, i saw it in the movies and liked it.
-
-
JayHJan 7, 20095Some good special effects, nice production but it's story is far fetched and not very frightening. It all looks very familiar and it lacks originality. The performances are fine. Empty and doesn't involve the viewer.
-
-
ValterLMay 31, 20090One of the worst movies ever. The plot doesn't make any sense, and when you think it's about to end, it suddenly introduces a Nun-turned-Monster so ridiculous I was speechless. And the scariest thing about it it's a pigeon. I want my money back.
-
-
PaulC.Nov 16, 20089
-
-
ChadS.Aug 18, 20086
-
-
SamA.Aug 25, 20088Not very enticing story - good gore - Sutherland is excellent.
-
-
ClaudiaM.Sep 13, 200810I totally loved this movie, it was so freaky.. especially the little girl Anna when she was possessed and then when she was old.. I dont know why ppl always give it a low rating.. im sure they'd never even be able to plot a good movie.
-
-
PetePDec 14, 20085Long: YES, Scary: YES, Cinematography: BAD, Plot: BAD, Cast: OK, Recomend to watch: NOT on the cinema but rent the DVD
-
-
Dec 1, 201010
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
40This remake of a South Korean movie ultimately provides fewer scares than the average aging baby boomer feels every time they look into a reflective surface.
-
33The film looks to do for reflective surfaces what "Amityville 4" did for killer lamps.
-
63Actually a marked improvement over the plodding and confusing original.