Metascore
48 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 27 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 27
  2. Negative: 7 out of 27
  1. A human-scale comedy that reaches across generations to tickle, connect and embrace.
  2. Leelee Sobieski and Albert Brooks, especially Mr. Brooks, deliver outstanding performances in the first feature film to be directed by Ms. Lahti.
  3. As it stands, it's cute, occasionally poignant and outrageously implausible.
  4. 75
    About reaching out, about seeing the other person, about having something to say and being able to listen. So what if the ending is in autopilot? At least it's a flight worth taking.
  5. 75
    Offers something rare for a modern movie: an uncynical depiction of the redemptive power of human relationships.
  6. 75
    While My First Mister has considerable charm, it suffers somewhat from comparison with "Ghost World."
  7. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    75
    Risks seeming too earnestly therapeutic for its own good. But what makes My First Mister a successful feature directing debut for Lahti is the emotional veracity it summons.
  8. 70
    Christine Lahti, making her directorial debut, wrings good laughs and strong emotion throughout, largely through the performances.
  9. In its first two-thirds, My First Mister, which marks Christine Lahti's feature directorial debut, looks to be a winner. But it takes a disastrously wrong turn toward the end that all but destroys the good work that's come before.
  10. Reviewed by: David Edelstein
    70
    It's a measure of Brooks' stature that he survives the self-sabotage and comes through with his most engaging performance in years.
  11. It's a real shame the film gets mushy at the end. The result is an all too conventional ending on a film that should have been much better.
  12. 50
    Sobieski manages to make Jennifer's inevitable transformation more than a little bittersweet. Apparently even clichés click sometimes.
  13. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    50
    The harder this film tries to be quirky and edgy, the more it feels like a run-of-the mill TV movie.
  14. 50
    Lahti's feature directorial debut plays like a watered-down variation ("Ghost World") -- that is, until the final third, when the film not only deviates but flat out derails.
  15. The splendid performance by Sobieski, who ends her long run as industry-mag buzz princess and arrives as a full-fledged star.
  16. My First Mister, which was written by Jill Franklyn, watches Jennifer with lively interest, but rarely pierces the mysteries of her soul.
  17. 50
    A bathetic TV-movie-type "learning experience" that provides about as much insight into teenagers as 40s westerns did into Indians--it's all in the costumes and customs.
  18. Brooks guards the movie from overheating in a surfeit of warmedy.
  19. By the film's interminable, unforgivably embarrassing third act it sinks in a sticky swamp of sentimentality.
  20. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    40
    Lahti's feature directorial debut walks an innocuous middle line between the story's maudlin possibilities and its meaningful potential.
  21. Drifts from goofy situation comedy to pop culture parody to a last-act load of sentiment that would sink a trash barge.
  22. Reviewed by: Ken Fox
    30
    One hundred and nine minutes of drama and not a single moment rings true.
  23. Although the movie has its moments, it's a tearjerker that jerks too hard.
  24. A coming-of-age story that gets it all wrong.
  25. 20
    The best that can be said about director Christine Lahti's feature debut is that it doesn't fall into any ready category.
  26. The movie is fussy and organized rather than moving. It follows a pattern so precisely, it's as if Lahti thought points would be taken off if she colored outside the lines.
  27. 16
    Intelligent teens will hate this film, and adults will just be embarrassed.
User Score

Universal acclaim- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 12
  2. Negative: 0 out of 12
  1. Lain
    10
    It's a great movie. Critics say it was too cliche? How old are these critics? They seem to have forgotten what it felt like to be that age. Intelligent teens will find this movie interesting and relate to the notion of leaving teen-angst behind, to come to a better understanding of the world around them. Adults might just remember that 9-5 routines aside, they are not all that dead yet and still have that strong will to live free. Very good acting and directing. I'd recommend it anytime. Full Review »
  2. JoeQ.
    10
    Not for the sophisticate but rings true. Fine work by the principals - Sobieki & Brooks most for all - no false surfaces.
  3. PatriciaS.
    10
    Every year, there is a movie that I love every minute of and have to immediately watch again for the sheer enjoyment of it. This film is it for me this year. I eschew the comments from those who question the reality of the teen character or the wonderful ending. As a high school teacher, mother of 5 and a former teen, it amazed me in its insights. The performances by all cast were top notch. This has made my "Need to See Every Year List." As for the critics, they work so hard to keep their jobs by practicing what Rob Brezny calls "pop nihilism." A steady stream of social cynicism is boring, lazy and has gotten very old. Full Review »