- Studio: Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 21, 2007
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75A welcome throwback to family-friendly PG moviemaking.
-
70This ain't "The Da Vinci Code," folks, and the reason you can tell is that it's actually quite entertaining.
-
70Cage is back in crackling good form in National Treasure: Book of Secrets.
-
67Director Jon Turteltaub has fun with Indian glyphs, giant stone pulleys, and an Indy Jones-worthy City of Gold located beneath the rocky shoals of Mount Rushmore.
-
67It's a measure of the film's infectious goofiness that Cage seems altogether more interested in clearing the name of a long-dead ancestor than in finding a city of gold.
-
60It contains all the elements from the original film...But that's the problem: It's virtually the same movie with new locations. Oh, plus Helen Mirren. Not a bad addition, but the popcorn fun is gone.
-
Like its predecessor, "National Treasure," this sequel amounts to a bunch of crossword puzzle answers stitched together with explosions, chases and displays of intuitive reasoning that the "Twin Peaks" F.B.I. agent Dale Cooper would reject as too right-brained.
-
60Graced with some extra star wattage courtesy of Helen Mirren and Ed Harris, this diminishing-returns sequel sends Nicolas Cage on another quest to strike it rich, get young auds excited about history and solve puzzles that are generally less stimulating than yesterday's Sudoku.
-
58A strictly by-the-book sequel: It doesn't cheat series fans but it doesn't offer many thrills or surprises or lingering puzzles, either.
-
50The movie has terrific if completely unbelievable special effects. The actors had fun, I guess. You might, too, if you like goofiness like this.
-
50If there was an iota of plausibility to any of this, we could forgive the film's greater leaps of imagination - all those break-ins of absurdly unprotected bastions of Western civilization. But this is not audience-participation suspense. All you can do is sit and watch, and wish there was more wonder.
-
50It shares all the original's shortcomings ---it's too long and too loud and filled with historical disinformation -- but none of the snap that made "National Treasure" fun for kids and a guilty pleasure for some adults.
-
50This sequel is what you would expect: If you liked the original, you'll probably enjoy this retread. But be warned: It bogs down in a drawn-out scene near the end. There's certainly nothing to treasure about this movie, but if a popcorn movie with moderate intrigue and occasional humor is what you're after, this is just the ticket.
-
50Often as noisy, dippy, and enjoyable as 2004's "National Treasure," and when it's not, it's just another sequel, more absurd than most.
-
50Everything has been significantly amped up -- bigger, louder, further removed from reality -- but it also feels that much more forced. Cage and Kruger seem like they're not having much fun this time around, and Bartha still gets the best throwaway lines.
-
50Leave it to coproducer Jerry Bruckheimer to revive the Indiana Jones cycle without the period setting, the camp elements, or Spielberg's efficiency; director Jon Turteltaub just plods along, and the script by Marianne and Cormac Wibberley is equally poker-faced.
-
50No better than the first – which means it will probably be creamed by critics and make a jillion dollars. But really, standards are standards.
-
40Is the film fun? Yeah, in that campy kind of "The Mummy" way, but it is also weak as a sequel in that very campy "The Mummy Returns" type of way.
-
40A turgid action sequel that loses sight of plot and characters in its humourless efforts to impress.
-
40Book of Secrets isn't so much a romp as a long trudge through American history factoids and conspiracy-theory gobbledygook. Cool car chase, though.
-
38All you want from a movie like this, really, is a little brainless fun, and it keeps holding out on you. Everyone looks fatigued. Even Cage's toupee seems ambivalent about having signed on for a sequel.
-
38It's another flick about maps, landmarks and buried treasure that makes "The Da Vinci Code" look like TOLSTOY.
-
38Like a grade-school version of an Indiana Jones adventure.
-
38"Mindless" applies, and Book of Secrets is more like a tame, endlessly repetitive amusement park ride than a motion picture.
-
38The movie does feature a nice, teasing chemistry between veteran actors Voight and Mirren (who clearly relishes the chance to break out of stuffy melodrama), but this shallow, empty puzzle requires more than playful banter to satisfy audiences willing to pay to play.
-
Throughout all this, Cage's lazy, dull performance – who knew there were so many ways to express smugness? – is enlivened only by poorly timed bursts of exuberance.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 35 out of 81
-
Mixed: 15 out of 81
-
Negative: 31 out of 81
-
GeorgeM2
-
FrankV.3