- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75Eight different characters, all played by Murphy, all convincing, each with its own personality. This is not just a stunt. It is some kind of brilliance.
-
75Frequently hilarious.
-
75It's a half-life better than Martin Lawrence treading similar, simpler water in "Big Momma's House."
-
75When have we seen the same performer playing both parts in a sexual situation? It happens here, not once but twice.
-
70Murphy still knows how to please a crowd.
-
70Nothing less than stunning: a slapstick ballet of choreographed buffoonery.
-
67Messy and scattershot, with a plot that's little more than a dirty version of ''Flubber.''
-
63Despite greater resources and high-tech whiz bang than the first movie, has a lot more turkey than dinner.
-
60Too often, the movie is more forced and frantic than actually funny.
-
60This is a parlor trick, but it's a hell of a good one.
-
58Murphy is remarkably convincing -- even endearing -- as each of the characters.
-
50Has some very funny moments, it is weighed down by gooey sentimentality.
-
50It's just like Paul McCartney's first solo album after the Beatles broke up; he played all the instruments himself -- because he could.
-
50Yes, bestiality in a PG-13 movie. It's the end of life as we know it.
-
50There's a whole lotta latex goin' on. The trouble is that not enough else is going on.
-
50Character-rich, but plot-poor.
-
50The bloom is off the rose due to cynical rehash.
-
50Half a movie at best. The broad humor at times derails Mr. Murphy's performances, but the movie provides a vehicle for him to display his reach.
-
50Defiantly sophomoric, often hilarious and crude as all get-out.
-
40The "Citizen Kane" of flatulence.
-
38This inferior sequel is doomed by a lousy - and extremely vulgar - script.
-
38He (Murphy) can't make chicken a la king from the chicken manure supplied by the writers.
-
30An amazing technical accomplishment that never becomes a coherent movie.
-
30Sporadically funny, the film seems weighted down, literally, with bulging, bulbous Murphys flatulating endlessly.
-
30Half vulgar and funny, half tedious and cloying; despite the shameless laughs, it's still a disappointment.
-
30Be prepared to laugh less at a lot more of the same thing in this overbearing but underwhelming sequel.
-
25The star's over-the-top energy isn't enough to make this hopelessly vulgar, numbingly repetitious farce worth watching.
-
25An annoying, unclever, unlikable movie.
-
Suffers from a serious case of sophomore slump.
-
20What was a ragged but often hilarious charmer has been genetically altered into a deafening and desperate mutant.
-
20Wastes most of its 110 minutes making impotent jokes about male sexual behavior and the repugnance of old women.
-
10It will linger like a foul odor or the taste of tinfoil between the teeth.
-
10Utterly unnecessary sequel.
-
10The thrill is definitely gone, leaving a disappointing and unpleasant mess in its place.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2 out of 6
-
Mixed: 2 out of 6
-
Negative: 2 out of 6
-
10