SummaryThis Academy Award-winning biography of American General George S. Patton chronicles the general's wartime activities and accomplishments, beginning with his entry into the North African campaign and ending with his removal from command after his outspoken criticism of US post-war military strategy.
SummaryThis Academy Award-winning biography of American General George S. Patton chronicles the general's wartime activities and accomplishments, beginning with his entry into the North African campaign and ending with his removal from command after his outspoken criticism of US post-war military strategy.
Maybe not the best movie I've ever seen, but surely my favorite film of all time. Of all the characters in cinema history, Patton is the character I identify with the most. George C. Scott's performance as General Patton is the greatest male performance ever. There is not a second on the screen where Scott looks like he is acting. Every scene, every set looks realistic. This is a monumental achievement in acting, directing, writing, musical score, production, and editing.
I am not even a war movie kinda gal, saw some documentaries about Patton and was so surprised how well this movie was made and directed. Knowing there is no CGI, I was amazed how realistic the war scenes were...this is a whole production, soooo well done. Scott is just amazing and so believable. It’s a must see classic. I would buy this movie if I could. An American classic.
A giant Rorschach blot of a film, Patton can be read any number of ways, from a sly satire of gung-ho militarism to an epic glorification of Patton's old-school mentality.
Made at the height of the Vietnam war, this remarkable film presents the second world war on an epic scale while painting a warts-and-all portrait of the military genius General George Patton (George C Scott), part mystic, part mad martinet. [28 Sep 2014, p.47]
As a study of power, neither Coppola's script nor Schaffner's direction are precise enough to merit the praise that has been heaped upon them. As an exercise in biography, however, Schaffner and Coppola's character study of General George S Patton is marvellous, especially in its sideways debunking of the American Hero.
It’s the script, started by many hands, crafted into something an actor at his best seething, or in full bellow, could sink his teeth into, that makes this series of movie accidents a “lust for glory” that lasts.
The Allies won WW2 but we don't know that much about the details. This movie fleshes out one of the more famous (the M-48 tank is called the Patton) generals. He's egotistical, tactless, and probably got a lot of soldiers killed. But in a war to decide who was going to rule the world, he was our "go to" guy. I've seen a few documentaries about 1944; the mood of the people was turning anti-war; kind of like the Vietnam protests. We might have made peace with **** Germany and the Japanese empire rather than getting their surrender. What would the world look like now? I don't have many DVDs but this one is in my collection.
George C. Scott's portrayal of the WWII General George Patton is a sight to behold, and it's really his performance that drives the whole movie - not at all a bad thing.
a self-challenged and self-motivated..
Patton
3 Out Of 5
Patton is a character driven feature that follows up its characters like an irrevocable command. The work that went behind writing just the protagonist clearly pays off, for it is the only thread that one wants to hold on to in this overstretched journey and boy what a thrilling ride it has to offer.
It is rich on technical aspects like costume, production and art design, sound department, cinematography and editing. The camera work is stunning, it is shot beautifully with amazing locations and visuals that endorses the feature. The screenplay by Francis Ford Coppola and Edmund H. North, is electrifying and smart if not gripping and the only reason to that would be the overlong runtime that it ticks for which seems inessential at certain points. Franklin J. Schaffner; the director, is in his A game and has done an excellent work on executing the feature which could have easily been blunt and disenchanting and the key to that would be the sense of urgency that is created to bind it all. The performance objective is scored majestically by the protagonist George C. Scott and Karl Malden in his supporting role. Patton is a self-challenged and self-motivated feature whose protagonist justifies its title like never before.
I decided to watch 'Patton', the all-time favorite film of James
Berardinelli, someone i respect a lot, and someone who has a very
profound taste in films, which i like, i always love reading his
reviews.
Me, as usual going in to any movie with high hopes and high
expectation, since it is the #1 film of someone i respect, but boy, o
boy was i disappointed. This is a lifeless, patriotic, American piece
of propaganda. In a very, very negative way. It has no redeeming
qualities, and every battle scene you get showed, you don't care about
who gets bombed and gets shot at by infantry, because everyone that
gets killed in the battle scenes are faceless puppets, something an
emotionally driven war picture needs.
The whole movie is about George S. Patton, an eccentric and
controversial American war general with a short fuse, you might think
that will result in some fantastic scenes. No, not really. The whole
movie is really about how great Americans are, and how great this
maniacal war general is, showing manly decisions, epic battles (battles
that have no gravitas at all), how great he handles everything, etc,
etc. Each scene in 'Patton' could've easily been cut 2 to 4 minutes,
resulting in a dragging and overlong movie with an unneeded runtime of
172 minutes.
All in all, i still gave 'Patton' a 1/10 because George C. Scott
undeniably gives a powerhouse performance, and i respect Franklin J.
Schaffner a lot, attempting to make a memorable war picture.