User Score
5.6 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 583 Ratings

User score distribution:

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Sep 24, 2011
    5
    Man, the story is getting dumber...
  2. Jan 12, 2011
    10
    Stunning, absolutely stunning in all ways... UN-describable awesome story and incredible swash-buckling action and it's just... Brilliant and.... WOW
  3. IainM.
    Jun 15, 2007
    0
    The longest 3 hours of my life, summed up in 3 words - silly, long, dull.
    • 3 of 4 users said yes
  4. IGiveUp
    Jun 4, 2007
    0
    Too long, impossible to follow, no chemistry, wooden acting, and a lame script. Other than that this trash was wonderful.
    • 3 of 3 users said yes
  5. RobbyT.
    Dec 7, 2007
    3
    Depp and Rush seem to be the only ones to realize what kind of movie they're really in: a $300 million third installment of a franchise based on a ride at Disney World. Chow-Yun Fat's character is completely useless and Knightley's performance is absurd. Everytime she yelled, "FIRE!" I almost laughed out loud. Overall it is better than the treading water of Dead Man's Chest, but that isn't saying much. Expand
    • 3 of 4 users said yes
  6. Dec 30, 2011
    6
    Again the story gets emotionally well written at the heart of the movie, but it isn't very well told so the movie definitely suffers. Although it benefits from amazing performance, breathtaking visuals, clever humor which only makes sense if you have seen the first two installments and a great ending well supposed to be ending for an unforgettable franchise. I give this movie 60%.
  7. Mar 29, 2012
    7
    I just read that this was the most expensive movie ever made - for 300 million dollars! It's a very, very good movie, but it seems like a huuuge waste...
  8. KyleH
    Jun 2, 2007
    9
    It pretty much comes down to this: Do you like pirates? Do you like Johnny Depp? Do you like Keira Knightly? Do you like escapism? Can you not be cynical for 2 1/2 hours? If you answered "no" to any of these questions, save yourself the time and save us from having to listen to you complain.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  9. OrvilleS.
    Jun 6, 2007
    0
    Unforgivably dull and long. Vapid performances. Please, let's end this series of movies at 3. Don't do a fourth!
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  10. Philter137
    May 27, 2007
    4
    Sadly, this movie was a big disappointment for me. There were some good aspects - the sets, costumes and special effects were excellent and deserve to be recognised for their technical complexity and flawlessness, BUT... the story was unsteady, unengaging and at times difficult to follow. The dialouge was forgettable, the humor was tired, the peformances mostly lacklustre. The worst error was the pacing - long unmoving conversations that failed to draw you into the story, followed by action sequences that built up too quickly to a fever pitch and stayed there forever, a steady stream of exaggerated feats and narrow escapes, one after the other, over and over and over - the result; a solid wall of audio and video noise that quickly became boring. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  11. KoreyW.
    May 29, 2007
    8
    Movie was a little bit long. If you can understand what is happening with jack and the others then it's a very good movie. Plenty of room though to make it very hard to follow. Good effects and a little more violent than most disney movies.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  12. RobertH
    May 30, 2007
    5
    A morose tone, messy narrative, and superfluous subplots make this a real disappointment. The summer season has definitely seen better films.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  13. Elena
    Jun 3, 2007
    0
    Discombobulated from the original. Just a lot of special effects to take advantage of the first Pirates and separate us, the suckers, from our hard earned money. What did P T Barnum once say.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  14. WilliamH
    May 29, 2007
    1
    All I kind think afterword was I want 3 hours of my life back.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  15. Bobbie
    May 31, 2007
    0
    Totally lame without any chemistry. Wooden acting and quite frankly too long and boring.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  16. AricM.
    May 30, 2007
    0
    This movie left me angry. A complete waste of time.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  17. DirkM.
    Jun 5, 2007
    5
    Uninspired storytelling with few laughs. The chemistry between the actors from the first two movies is non-existent in this one. The efforts to shove Depp's charm down our throat was insulting at best.
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  18. DaveW.
    May 24, 2007
    5
    More proof that Pirates should have been left as a single film (just like the Matrix) the sequels only dilute what a brilliant film the original was. Its just too long and rambling, the whole cast to use from the first but it has no sparkle or any really great moments, shame.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  19. FabioP.
    May 25, 2007
    2
    Good Lord, that was disappointing. I loved Curse of the black pearl and liked Dead man's chest, but this was really horrible. There's no script at all, and the whole movie is an utterly boring sequence of dialogues which barely have sense. No wit, no humour, and most of all NO ACTION: in 2 hours and 40 minutes, only the last part is somewhat exciting, even if uninspired. Oh, and did i mention that the characters act like they were psychos, changing their minds every five minutes? This was everything a pirate action movie SHOULD'NT be. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  20. RichardH
    May 25, 2007
    4
    Too long, boring, rubbish script, loads of waffling, retarded ending, etc. etc. On the plus side, it does finish eventually.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  21. BrianDuggan
    May 28, 2007
    3
    Horrible mess of a movie. The plot made hardly any sense. No emotional connection to the actors. And way too over-the-top and long. However, Jerry's special effects team does wonders. Too bad they didn't apply the same level of skill to the film's script.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  22. GregS.
    May 28, 2007
    3
    Long, confusing, and at times, boring. I actually fell asleep at one point
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  23. JennyH.
    May 29, 2007
    1
    Absolutely retarded movie. Very poorly plotted and convoluted. I'm not sure the writers could even followed the plot of their own movie.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  24. guy!
    Sep 5, 2007
    8
    Kinda strange, really long and complex, but if you're one of those guys who love non-stop, completely intense, in-your-face action; then this is your movie.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  25. SonnyS.
    May 24, 2007
    1
    The fight at the end was good the rest of the film dragged and didn't make arny sense.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. DavidS.
    May 24, 2007
    2
    Like the 2nd installment, this one wasn't very good. Lacks the humor and heart of the original.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. CCM.
    May 28, 2007
    10
    At first I was confused. But I have to admit, I still loved it. I see no problem with it except for the part where Lord Beckett goes down with his ship. Too much. Well anyway I enjoyed it, WATCH IT!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. Ryencoke
    May 28, 2007
    0
    Haha, oh man was this bad. I had no idea what was going on this movie at all. The only good thing about it was easily Johnny Depp & Kieth Richards. The first one was the only good one. Hollywood's usual "Let's try to sell-out".
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. ChristianH.
    May 28, 2007
    8
    A huge improvement to Dead Man's Chest!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. Dwight
    May 28, 2007
    0
    I only have one question after watching nearly three hours of this disconnected garbage. What was the Director thinking? How in hell can you release something this bad? Someone, anyone in charge had to see how truly awful this was. Avoid at all costs.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  31. BrianM
    May 30, 2007
    7
    Not as fun as the first one, but I was impressed by the complexity of the story line and some of the twists in the plot. Would have been better had it been shorter. It was a lot of set up, but the action at the end was a pretty good payoff.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. SrikanthK.
    Jun 25, 2007
    10
    Simply an awesome movie. The 1st half was a bit slow filling up the gaps of the dead man's chest but the second half simply rocked. It completely ROCKED with that climax and a superb twist at the end didn't expect it at all. i give it best of the three parts
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. JuanM.
    Jun 3, 2007
    1
    Movie was very long, very convoluted, complicated to understand.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. JamesA.
    Jun 30, 2007
    8
    A funny and good film. Daring for a Disney film, as it starts with a hanging scene and has a totally-white Captain Jack Sparrow scene -- not often seen in a mainstream Hollywood production.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. MattE
    Jun 4, 2007
    8
    Good final installment of the series. the plot twists can get a little hard to follow but not overwhelming. good action sequences. Definitely go see this film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. Tony
    Jun 4, 2007
    8
    Well, I have to say I don't blame people who rated this movie low. This is after all a space for critics and if you chose to critique the thing that is "movie" you will have to concede points about character development and overall plot. That said, I was still entertained by this movie! Its a fun ride, with hammy characters and fun action scenes. The ending sequence with the pearl and the dutchman is worth the wait. Pirates fighting, monkeys being shot our of canons and huge explosions... all in all, fun! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. SteveK
    Jun 6, 2007
    9
    I am not confused about the plot, but I am befuddled by all the negative reviews. I will say this: do yourself a favor and watch the last 15 minutes of Pirates I and all of Pirates II before you see this one. You will find that the plot is actually not that confusing, it's just that most of us have a hard time remembering what happened the last time around if it's been almost a year. If you can follow the plot, just hang on and enjoy the ride. This movie is a return to true-swashbuckling form with everything one would want in a Pirates' movie. The last one got a little too dark for my taste. This is a *MILD SPOILER* but you should know that they unceremoniously dump the Kraken. You should know that going in, so you won't be too disappointed when it happens... er, more like doesn't happen. There is great atmosphere, some jaw-dropping scenes, spectacular battles, and quite a few funny moments, but again.... Review the movies before you watch!!! If you are scratching your head over the plot, you will miss out on the ride! (I think this is why people have had such negative reactions... they can't follow the movie, therefore they can't fully commit to the ride that Pirates takes you on. If you can't commit to a logical story, it's so much harder to suspend your disbelief, then the acting seems off and the action scenes seem pointless) This movie, indeed the whole series, is about enjoying a ride, much like at a theme park. This is a much more satisfying, enjoyable, and well-crafted third chapter to a series than say Spider-Man 3. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. KrisS.
    Jun 7, 2007
    7
    Generally entertaining throughout but incomprehensible and overlong. Lovely cinematography with a surrealist tinge.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. JluaU
    Jun 8, 2007
    2
    What these pirates have mostly killed is their creator's inspiration. No story, no inspiration, no dialog, and no good writing. A sequence of meaningless scenes spiced with special effects. Frankly, it's sad to think of the waste of good workmanship, in the middle of creative nothingness.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. JessicaW.
    Feb 9, 2008
    4
    Lacked the much loved characteristics of the characters.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. mixmastajb
    Oct 13, 2007
    0
    I am at a complete loss as to how anyone can defend this film. "In your face action," (which, in reality, it was far from) cannot make up for the very very poorly laid out plotpoints. I did not know what was going on more than half the time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  42. DarshanS.
    May 24, 2007
    9
    A fitting end that parallels the first...
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  43. OlgaG.
    May 24, 2007
    8
    In whole the movie's the best, Barbossa forever, but the script is a nightmare.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  44. JudyT.
    May 25, 2007
    7
    The ending redeems an over long, overly CGI laden, under use of good actors and over use of unecessary characters mess. I didn't buy Elizabeth as a pirate captain or monarchy one bit. She was enough to give women a bad name until the end.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  45. JaredB.
    May 25, 2007
    10
    A great addition to a fabulous series. I am very suprised to see so many people speaking badly against this movie. Definately one of the best movies of the summer. A great way to start off the summer season. ***Note: Make sure to stay until after the credits roll for a bonus scene!!!***
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  46. Mich
    May 25, 2007
    6
    It was very long and a hard to follow. I had no clue what was happening during the first half of the film due to slurred dialogue and too-close-up action shots. Also, multiple-Captain Jacks got on my nerves. Now it's the next day, and I'm still confused about what I saw, what happened and what it was even about. I couldn't get into the urgency of the story because I didn�39;t understand the story, or how it related to the previous two--which in turn, made me care less about the fate of the characters. Johnny had his shining moments as in all the other Pirates, but as with all sequels, we've seen it before. Warning: Be in the mood to see this film when you go. If you're the slightest bit hesitant about a 3 hour Pirates flick, wait! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  47. NatashaW.
    May 25, 2007
    7
    Pretty good. Not as good as the 2nd one.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  48. KariM.
    May 25, 2007
    10
    Awesome Movie better then the 2nd!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  49. GizzyR.
    May 26, 2007
    10
    I absoluetly loved this movie! i love all of its twists and turns. Johnny Depp is without a doubt HILARIOUS! i love the fact that they explain all of the characters in this installment. The battle scenes were amazingly well. There was a lot of Jack Sparrow in this movie, what more could a girl ask for! Over all i think this was the funniest installment of the pirates trilogy and is definitely one of the best movies of the year. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  50. AlpanaR.
    May 26, 2007
    1
    I haven't written a review on here before, but this movie was SO BAD that I felt like I had to warn others away. I was pretty familiar with the previous two installments, having seen both more than once, but I was confused throughout the movie. The first hour was totally unnecessary and boring and I basically lost my interest for the rest of the movie. It was not humorous, and hardly anyone laughed in the whole theater. I wish I had read/listened to more reviews before wasting my $11. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  51. GameraX
    May 26, 2007
    10
    I loved this movie from start to finish. It was incredibly intense and captivating. The entire cast gets a big gold star from me, as well as a hefty libation of rum. The mythological elements, storyline, action, and effects were outstanding. I love the great imagination and soulfulness at the heart in these films, especially AWE. The major theme of the Pirates trilogy, to me, is about choices and their costs, how those choices effect everyone and their relationships, and in the chaos that ensues, leads the various characters to great accomplishments, crushing failures, and unexpected ends. This movie is also about redemption and the power of love. Nearly every major character got the chance to redeem themselves for their past shenanigans in some way by the end of the film. I found that pretty uplifting, and I left the theatre with a smile on my face. I found myself greatly entertained and the screen time didn't feel like 168 minutes. Maybe I am not as jaded and ADD afflicted as the critics who seem to be trashing this movie. Oh, well. To each their own. Cheers! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  52. BobH.
    May 26, 2007
    0
    Whomever is responsible for this effort should be flogged and quartered and then made to walk the plank. To take these wonderful actors and writes something this bad is to bad to be believed. As much as we loved the first Pirates, that's how awful this last instalment in the series is. Even Captain Jack Sparrow can't save ths embarassment as the film is totally flat and appears to be written by a bunch of amateurs who don't have a clue in how to tell a story. At one point I considered walking out of the theater as this is how truly awful the movie is. Avoid at all costs. Two hours and forty five minutes and all you can find is a few chuckles between the boredom. You will be looking at your watch praying fot this garbage to mercifully be over. You have been warned. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  53. CaroleM.
    May 26, 2007
    6
    Great acting by Johnny Depp. Loved his father, Keith Richards. LOL Too many fight scenes.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  54. AlisaH.
    May 26, 2007
    10
    This was a spectacular finish to a beloved franchise. Many critics have complained about the length, storyline, and well other things, but the only thing I found mildly annoying was sometimes you couldn't hear them. I'm content about the length, I wanted a good long movie and that's what I got, you got an indulging storyline that you could chew over later and best of all. . . More Cap'n Jack Sparrow, what more could you want I ask. Critics are expecting this and that and then when they don't get exactly what they wanted they pull out a totally negative feedback to one of the best movies of the year, other examples to that claim would be Spider-Man 3, Shrek 3. Both are great movies and some critics just constantly need something to bash. So go enjoy more Pirates. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  55. MattH.
    May 27, 2007
    8
    A solid 8! very good story, a nice closer to a decent triolgy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  56. NickB.
    May 27, 2007
    10
    Early on in this film I thought to myself, "The unwashed masses are not going to get this one," and i think I am right. If, on the other hand, you aspire to watching something truly marvelous, inventive, and strangely genre-breaking, then At World's End may be for you. I can't speak for all, but to me, this movie was the very definition of why I love Summer films. It was so captivating and interesting that I didn't even noticed where the two hours and forty sevn minutes went.....just a brilliant action flick. But again, be warned: if you ever got irritated at a David Lynch film, or you think Dungeons & Dragons is for weirdo nerds, then you are probably not going to get this movie and might want to just go catch the latest Adam Sandler crud instead. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  57. SimonD.
    May 27, 2007
    8
    Not quite as good as the first, but still a very strong, very well developed and acted film with great twists, a darkness we don't expect from Disney, and some moments of sheer brilliance. Much better than the critics would have you think.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  58. Aaron
    May 27, 2007
    0
    Moronic and an assault on the senses. Possibly the turkey of the year. No chemistry whatsoever thanks to the writers who have lost touch with all reality. Even a wonderful actor like Johnny Depp can't save this Captain Jack Sparrow. Beware!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  59. AlexVanB.
    May 28, 2007
    7
    Completely ridiculous and highly enjoyable.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  60. JamesG.
    May 28, 2007
    8
    Look I'm not quite sure. Way too long, especially for kids, story flew all over the place, though Jerry Bruckheimer out does himself with the best special effects and explosions. My score is horribly biased due too this movie having the single best bad guy death ever!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  61. halb
    May 28, 2007
    5
    Well, as usual, those folks raving about this (with 9s and 10s) must be pretty easy to please... while those giving it less than 2 are probably being too harsh, and must have had very high expectations. After the second movie, I didn't have huge expectations and therefore wasn't all that disappointed. That said, this was an over-long, confusing and contrived mess of a movie, saved only by the occasional gallows humor, the little monkey and a few truly inspired scenes. The acting is fine, but is almost always overwhelmed by the action, the sets and the CGI. Keith Richards, although only on for a couple minutes, was most excellent as Sparrow's father. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  62. AMovieCritic
    May 28, 2007
    7
    It's as good as the past 2 installments. Unlike most of the world, I never really fell in love with these Pirates movies. They are each really fun and excellent-looking movies with great acting, but beyond that, I never really understood why this has become one of the biggest franchises of all time. That said, though, I had fun watching At World's End, just like I had fun watching the last 2 Pirates movies. At World's End is almost impossible to follow, it's extremely long, it lacks a strong, memorable new villain (they're just going after the humans? Boring...) and much of the action is saved until the end. But still...I had fun. Johnny Depp is better than ever as Captain Jack Sparrow, Geoffrey Rush is awesome as Barbarosa, and Kiera Knightly kicks ass in this installment, too. This is easily the best-looking movie I've ever seen, with some amazing cinematography and some great directing. Gore Verbinski knows how to make a movie epic. The music is also the best in the series as well. If you liked the past 2 Pirates movies, (more specifically, if you liked the 2nd one) you should enjoy this. Just make sure you watch the 2nd movie before seeing this one, as this movie makes no effort whatsoever to catch you up. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  63. Mick
    May 29, 2007
    7
    I quite enjoyed this movie! Not as good as the first, but overall it was good. The only thing I would say is that if they are to do a fourth they need to add the humor again. It just wasn't as funny as the first
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  64. RedRum
    May 29, 2007
    6
    Better than I expected considering the harsh reviews from the critics. Definitely had it’s corny moments but all in all I don’t regret shelling out $15 for tickets.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  65. KevinR
    May 30, 2007
    5
    While the witty one-liners and huge action opus scenes are truly exciting, the poor excuse for a plot that just makes things up as it goes (and not very well) kills what is otherwise a fairly entertaining romp across the seas.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  66. KalebF
    May 30, 2007
    10
    A great ending to the definitive pirates saga. The critics must not have seen the first two movies if their negative about this movie. The movie is great and the story is understandable. You just may need to recap on the first two movies first. I love this movie
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  67. IliaC.
    May 30, 2007
    7
    Many people in Russia already spent their money twice to watch this movie. 13.8 mln$ is our new record. Pirates is a action/comedy and there is no need in drama/tragedy episodes in sequence. 2.48 of this saga make me feel really tired. Storylines of too many heroes are still uncovered , betrayals and motives are quite unlogical and madJackTheSeriousTragical lost his battle with Rush's Barbossa. Depp looks tired from Pirates dialogue. People wanted to see just FUNny epic summer blockbuster but they saw just another variation of Matrix Revolutions. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  68. CharlieC
    May 30, 2007
    3
    Impressive special effects but a very confused and disappointing plot. This is not for kids or for adults. Teens will probably enjoy the energy and excitement of the nonstop action sequences and will overlook the lack of character development, originality, and message. Confusion, mayhem, and ear splitting sound effects will leave you exhausted. Parts one and two were fun and original. Aside from the technowizardry, number three is a waste of money and three hours of your quality time. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  69. AlecR.
    May 30, 2007
    10
    Well, critics of these Pirates of the Caribbean movies have always angered me. Why? Because people go to the movie to have fun and get away from their lives for a few hours, no to be emotionally stimulated or to cry over a divorce or something uninteresting like that. While this movie is better than the second, it isn't as good as the first. The story is understandable if you have a brain, and the action is always satisfying. However, I do have to agree that the Calypso thing was kind of out of no where. If anyone pays attention, the film is a great one, one that I will never forget for the rest of my life. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  70. MattS.
    May 30, 2007
    1
    If you're at least 12 years old, you have no excuse to like this movie. Laughable dialogue, a jumbled plot, no emotional connections with the characters. A three hour bore, easily the worst movie I've seen all year.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  71. ReelWorld
    May 30, 2007
    2
    2 points for FX. It was painfully obvious that the script had not been finished when they started shooting. The story goes all over the place - with long segments where characters try to explain what's going on. Double and Triple crosses ending with a ridiculous ending that includes everything from overt violence to necrophilia. Do yourself a favor and save the almost three hours this film takes to sit thru and enjoy the summer sunshine instead. A pitiful end to a franchise that began with a good opening film. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  72. SteveH.
    May 30, 2007
    3
    Good but NOT for kids. Plot HARD to follow and VERY abstract.. Save the $ for when it hits the $1 rental.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  73. CoryP.
    Jun 10, 2007
    8
    I guess a movie is only good any more if the f-bomb is used once every 10 minutes (eg. Knocked up) or is trying to make a political statement. The Pirate movies are meant to be popcorn movies to enjoy. Enjoy this movie ! It's not meant to cause some sort of spiritual awakening. So funny how critics can give knocked up such good reviews and turn around and find nothing to like about this movie. Nothing short of amazing. Best thing to do is go see this movie and form your OWN opinion. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  74. BennyH.
    Jun 13, 2007
    7
    The visuals are superb. As long as you're not one to care about making sense of all the pointless plot twists and shifting alliances, you will be entertained. I only cringed once, during the "nuptials whilst in battle" scene.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  75. fdasdafa
    Jun 13, 2007
    0
    Terrible, overly confusing and way to long.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  76. VeronicaJ.
    Jun 16, 2007
    10
    Best yet! I feel sorry for everyone who didn't quite get it because it was clever and intricate. I might add that almost all the negative remarks that say this movie was way 'to' long. The fact that you can't spell 'to' correctly - should be 'too' - could be an indicator of just why this movie isn't for you.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  77. BobB.
    Jun 16, 2007
    6
    I'm reviewing this only because the movie desperately needs it. Okay, was it an awesome movie? No, but it was action packed, interesting, and it finished the series in a way that didn't ruin it. The writers tried to cram too much info into the movie, and some of the acting sucked, but aside from that, the movie was fine. Just not awesome, but good enough for a fan to enjoy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  78. BenB.
    Jun 19, 2007
    5
    To think I could of wasted 3 hours on doing something more exciting like watching paint dry, I am glad I didn't pay for this movie. I used a voucher some one gave me, otherwise I would of asked for my money back. Made no sense, was really random. I gave it 5 for the special effects and the 2 jokes that did make me laugh.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  79. JustinH
    Jun 2, 2007
    2
    The second film showed signs of sinking but in this lame third outing the film is torpedoed. The narrative is so full of holes that is near impossible to follow parts of the film and the acting is so wooden by keira and orlando that they could have been a part of the furniture. Rumour has it that there wasn't a script when filming began and it shows. I echoed one of the characters questions about jack sparrow where he says "is he planning this or is he making it up as he goes along, I think the person in question was actually referring to the script. Abysmal Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  80. BlahBlah
    Jun 2, 2007
    10
    Aside from being the best movie to come out this year, this iteration of the Pirates series is easily the best of them all. It answers and closes every storyline, and does so in an amazing fashion. The plot is very easy to follow, too. Additionally, it has some of the most gargantuan CG action scenes ever made, including the climactic battle fought in the midst of a CGI maelstrom. You have absolutely no reason to not see this movie multiple times. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  81. LeonardB.
    Jun 3, 2007
    8
    This is a movie made to go see at the "movies" very entertaining! as far as the plot, what was so hard to understand???? the trick is to just sit back and take it all in, its fantasy not always meant to make perfect sense...open your mind critics.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  82. BillC.
    Jun 3, 2007
    4
    This things a bear to follow, and the quirky fun of Pirates #1 is no where to be found. The Kieth Richards cameo is so disappointing as well. You can see where the money went...special effects a-plenty..too bad a better , shorter,more cleaver story wasn't part of the deal. And the ending...it didn't seem to fit either. Disney just milked it's cash cow, and it shows. Bill C.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  83. JimS
    Jun 5, 2007
    0
    One word: stupid!. I don't understand the fascination with this series or Johnny Depp.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  84. JustinB.
    Jun 5, 2007
    9
    I loved it! Those who couldn't follow it should have tried either watching the previous movies or they should have payed attention. My only qualm is that it was a little too long.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  85. JohnH.
    Jun 5, 2007
    6
    Well, I saw the first two movies and loved them both. This movie left me with mixed feelings. I haven't watched Pirates since the second one came out in theatres, and let me tell you, if you want to fully enjoy it, don't do that, because it was confusing as h--l. However, as I watched more of the movie, parts came back to me, but even still, I found myself unable to comprehend some parts. I'm not sure if watching the first two would have helped or not, because I can usually recall movie facts pretty accurately, and there were parts of this movie that I just found completely irrelevant. It was too long. But, despite all that, I liked the movie. It had funny parts, and although somewhat cheesy, I found myself laughing at it. Recommendation: Watch the other two before you leave home on the day of going, and you'll like it. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  86. DaveM.
    Jun 5, 2007
    2
    This was genuinely one of the least enjoyable movies I've seen in years. Far too long, too many plots, characters (Chow Yun Fat's in particular was pointless), very little action barring an awful final half hour sea battle. Capt. Jack Sparrow was rendered irrelevant by the focus on Will and Elizabeth - Keira Knightley was very poor and Orlando Bloom not much better. Brief flashes of comedy were about the only thing to like with this one. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  87. CarolA.
    Jun 5, 2007
    0
    Talk about Jumping The Shark this flick is destined for one of the worst of the year. 300M on special effects and nothing more. Just a paycheck for the actors as no one stood out including the wonderful Johnny Depp. This movie is horrific. Too bad to be believed. Avoid at all costs.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  88. SwordS.
    Jul 3, 2007
    3
    This is an achievement: it manages to be tedious, dismally overcomplicated and shallow - all at the same time. Depp rehashes previous performances, only Rush acts convincingly and the old chemistry is totally absent between Knightley and Bloom. Sad.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  89. TravisB.
    Jul 6, 2007
    10
    This movie offers you the best of thrilling emotions, along with one of the most intricate and well written plots ever brought to the cinema. not to mention the great effects and action scenes.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  90. BernB.
    Sep 20, 2007
    10
    this movie was really fun and all of you people saying it was horrible you're not a movie critic so get over it and if you didn't get the plot you're just a dumbass.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  91. StacyK.
    Feb 3, 2008
    9
    I loved this movie! I dont think it was better than the second one, but it was definatly good. I follow these movies prety good! My fav. character is Will Turner!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  92. LauraW.
    Feb 4, 2008
    10
    Absolutely amazing! I watched it 5 times in two days! I think that that Hans Zimmer is a rival to Mozart and Keira, Johnny and Orlando are definitely at their best in this movie!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  93. henryh
    Oct 1, 2007
    10
    Givin it a ten to credit the last 2 movies but really i'd give it a 7 or 6 since the acting is not really top and the movie was a bit too long, but overall great movie and great trilogy end.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  94. RubaD.
    Oct 14, 2007
    8
    This is a completely fantastic film it may be confusing but sit up pay attention for 1 minute or 2 now and again and you'll find it the best.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  95. wtfisthis
    Dec 18, 2007
    0
    I cannot described how bad this movie is. Absolute garbage. The first one made was good. The 2nd and this 3rd one however is ridiculous. It has no real new plot...rather it's just a continuation of the 2nd one. It gets incredibly boring and stale and is way too long. I forced myself to watch the entire movie hoping for some redeeming moments but no, it was garbage the whole way through. Keira Knightley is a horrid actress (looks horrid too) and her role in this movie is stupid. What you see in this movie isn't new...you'd have seen it all before in the first 2. That said, the fighting is all the same. You'd think people would learn that when trilogies are made, 90% of the time each movie is worse than the one before it and this is the case with the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy. The fact that this one was made literally at the same time as the 2nd one definitely shows. Don't know why anyone would go out and buy this on DVD....save your money. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  96. fredbob
    Dec 29, 2007
    5
    Did not live up to the first two at all. I loved the first films.. but his one .... i really did not like. Hope they make another one and save the series!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  97. CarlH.
    May 24, 2007
    2
    A huge disappointment.Instead of continuing with the concept they had they tried to add even more which only led to a huge mess that smells over the top in every single scene.The after the texts ending is totally out of place in such a movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  98. AlexW.
    May 24, 2007
    0
    tripe. badly plotted. badly acted. occasionally cringeworth. never funny. rip pirates.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  99. SeanP.
    May 24, 2007
    0
    C-R-A-P! That about sums up the bloated, incoherent mess that is Pirates 3. Whoever said more is better didn't sit through this snoozefest. True, the action piece in the last third of the movie is epic, but for that to improve the rating, that has to matter. But it doesn't! The movie had lost me far earlier than when the action kicks in. If the movie had been half as long, I might have given it a 3. But making me suffer for 3 whole hours. Captain Jack gets a goose egg. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  100. TheLex
    May 24, 2007
    9
    It rocked! It felt like the first film, but was even more action-packed! I enjoyed every minute of it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 36 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 36
  2. Negative: 5 out of 36
  1. 63
    The last 60 minutes offer adventure as rousing as anything provided in either of the previous installments. Unfortunately, that doesn't account for the other 108 minutes of this gorged, self-indulgent, and uneven production.
  2. Reviewed by: Helen O'Hara
    60
    The plot's a trippy, twisty mess, and it's far too long, but it looks fantastic and makes some bold choices in its execution. And once again Jack's back to save the day.
  3. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    60
    The third voyage in the "Priates" trilogy could be touted as "The biggest, loudest and second-best (or second-worst) 'Pirates' ever!" -- not necessarily a ringing endorsement, but honest.