- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: Jul 27, 2001
User Score
5.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 135 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 62 out of 135
-
Mixed: 28 out of 135
-
Negative: 45 out of 135
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
BRApr 18, 20063I can't understand anyone giving this movie even a mediocre scroe. It was terrible. bad acting, predicatable plot. Just plain dumb.
-
-
TurkB.Jan 5, 20020Simply awful - this one makes you think? Sorry Joey D. - watching POTA (2001) takes as much thought as watching a video-game - in ten years, this version will be long forgotten.
-
-
PaulaW.Nov 12, 20013
-
-
KarenAug 23, 20013One for makeup, one for art direction, one for incredibly realistic movement of the apes. Everything else was unsatisfying. Especially disappointing was raising the specter of interspecies relationships, then kissing off the monkey/human love interest.
-
-
PatC.Jan 7, 20043The original had a modicum of unique stimulating content. None of it made it into this remake. This is not really remade but de-evolved. It's a formula piece that stole the name of an old movie that worked. The final confrontation was, what's the word, ape-ish.
-
-
RobertF.Aug 17, 20014Tim Roth seems to be auditioning for the ape version of "Richard III" and Helena B. Carter gears her entire performance towards making hot monkey love with Marky Mark...so where's the hot monkey love scene Mr. Burton?
-
-
BobB.Aug 24, 20012Really dull! dull! dull! in spite of the makeup and sets. The story was dumb, and most of the apes had dark vader's voice. The acting was pathetic. I was really disappointed.
-
-
CBBJun 28, 20022The original was better, much better. The only thing I liked about this movie was how realistic the ape make up was compared to the original.
-
-
YoonC.Sep 24, 20034
-
-
VladimirP.Jan 27, 20021
-
-
SimonMar 22, 20021Terrible script, and what seems to me to be terrible direction, just fails to be at all interesting, or fun or exciting!
-
-
ShourovB.Sep 29, 20021
-
-
Jun 21, 20110Are you kidding ? Here we venture deep, deep into B-movie territory, with everything from the CGI to the acting to the makeup being plain...ridiculous ! The old and the young apes are really unbelievably, flabbergastingly unwatchable. This is moviemaking at its worst ! I swear one of the monkeys looks like Prince !
-
Feb 10, 20132Planet of the Apes is so shallow, covered with idiocy, and actors acting worse than monkeys. Tim Burton has disgraced the original and hurt is reputation.
-
May 13, 20134This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
63Burton's made a film that's respectful to the original, and respectable in itself, but that's not enough. Ten years from now, it will be the 1968 version that people are still renting.
-
50With the exception of a battle scene with apes on all fours charging the humans, the film is monumentally silly.
-
40When Mr. Burton's "Planet" fixes on being entertaining...it succeeds. But the picture states its social points so bluntly that it becomes slow-witted and condescending; it treats the audience as pets.