- Studio: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM)
- Release Date: Mar 16, 2007
User Score
5.5
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 65 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 33 out of 65
-
Mixed: 10 out of 65
-
Negative: 22 out of 65
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
LAug 24, 20095
-
-
RickyQMay 6, 20096There are plenty of plot holes that are sure to frustrate most people, but in the end if you overlook them the movie can be quite enjoyable and suspenseful. What I really didn't like was why we weren't really told why Bullock has these premonitions. Seems like a lazy way to make what should be a typical movie into something more interesting.
-
-
HannahNov 27, 20079I actually enjoyed this movie... it was very suspenseful and thrilling. Unlike other movies that I've seen lately. I didn't think it was horrible like the movie critics thought but hey I'm not a pro at this kinda stuff.
-
-
[Anonymous]Nov 24, 200710Just another example on how the critics are out of touch and got it wrong....its hard to believe that they watch the same movies as i do......this was an amazing movie, and i could care less what the snobbish "professional" critics say.
-
-
NickM.Nov 24, 20079I really don't understand how this movie can be rated so low....there were some places that could have been a little better, but overall i thought this was exciting and entertaining.
-
-
SteveKOct 16, 20075
-
-
PatC.Sep 4, 20074Nothing here to diminish Bullock's competence as an actress, but if one can see the future as past events, one must conclude here that those who learn from the past are also doomed to repeat it. For those few, those unhappy few who have the option, this movie is a good argument to take life as it comes rather than skipping ahead.
-
-
PeterK.Aug 30, 20072I saw this on a plane... and was glad when we landed that I had not wasted money on a theater ticket. The film falls completely flat at its ending. Think of baking a cake that never rises.
-
-
MichelL.Aug 13, 20078Great Movie! I though it was similar to Lake House.
-
-
JaredC.Aug 9, 200710Not bad actually. The story isn't bad, and it sure dam isn't a lazy/slow Hide and Seek. Its adrenaline and never dull. A fantastic film based on a mysterious fantasy, a great dramatic performance.
-
-
thecritics.Aug 5, 20070This movie was a giant waste of my time, it ended excactly the way it started. DO NOT GO SEE THIS MOVIE (Unless of course you want to waste two hours of your life).
-
-
BrianJul 24, 20074
-
-
JackJul 24, 20070I'll pay the rental fee again to get my 2 hours back. If you're the type who gets annoyed by really bad plot holes, this movie will have you screaming when the credits start rolling. Yeah it's THAT bad. You've been warned. I've never submitted a vote here before, but this I had to get my pain heard.
-
-
ZOEKROGHJul 23, 20078I honestly do not know why this film was rated so poorly by the critics. It was challenging to follow and all questions were eventually answered. The alternative ending was a little over the top, but all in all the movie was alright.
-
-
billcJul 22, 20070The only thing good about this movie is Sandra Bullock. She is gorgeous.
-
-
KevinCJul 21, 20071
-
-
JoeT.Jul 18, 20078I'm surprised by all the bad reviews. Any mention of the Final Destinations or Butterfly Effect does the film a grave disservice. There's a touching grace to how the story unfolds. Yes, there are some plot inconsistencies, but the film carries it through with genuine heart (all too rare for cookie-cutter Hollywood).
-
-
AMay 13, 20071Boring, badly acted, weak plot that reaches out to the bible as an all saving solution.
-
-
ThomasS.Apr 16, 20071
-
-
IrishD.Apr 4, 20071Imagine the final destination trilogy without blood or excitement and you get premonition, a movie what makes you want to rub sand paper in your eyes, the film is not sandra bullocks best, and is as boring as watching 20 hours worth of chess...without any participents!
-
-
ElliotP.Mar 25, 20078
-
-
SusieH.Mar 24, 20077A little hard to follow but better than the critics said.
-
-
BitBurnMar 23, 20076Actually, I rate this movie more like 6.2/10. This movie wasn't half as bad as major critics claimed! Sure there are flaws; acting is a bit poor, plot incoherent, but overall it's aiight for cheap Tuesdays
-
-
DavinT.Mar 23, 20079In spite of inconsistencies of the plot, it packed a psychological punch --- and was effective overall.
-
-
CarlosMMar 22, 20076
-
-
MikeS.Mar 21, 20074
-
-
MichaelC.Mar 20, 20073Is he alive? Is he dead? Who cares? By the time the movie was over, all I wanted was an end to my own suffering.
-
-
ChadS.Mar 19, 20072
-
-
SamF.Mar 19, 20071This film is a real waste of money and time. Its a shame because Sandra Bullock is one of my favorites actresses in movies like Speed, The Net and Miss Congeniality. But this film has so many holes, does not go anywhere and ends up not explaining anything but to be a religious moral story.
-
-
AL.Mar 18, 20071
-
-
HondoJ.Mar 18, 20079
-
-
JakeA.Mar 18, 20070Boring and pointless on top of morally ambigous. What was the point. Faith, Hope? It took a lot of faith and hope to not walk out of that film.
-
-
TabU.Mar 17, 20078One of the best mystery-thriller in years that uses great photography, cinematography, and soundtrack to capture a substantive, meaningful emotional, relational, and moral underpinnings.
-
-
DennisG.Mar 13, 20072Silly muddled story. Poor acting. Zero credibility.
-
-
60This slick exercise about a housewife whose spouse might or might not be dead is effective until a downright maudlin close.
-
Had the film maintained a tone of kooky, Kafkaesque tragicomedy, narrowing in on Linda's wacko wrestling match with the laws of physics, we might really have had something here.
-
63The star and the more overwrought aspects of the plot are mainstream but the philosophical implications will not appeal to those who prefer easily digestible cinematic portions. It's also true that the more deeply one considers the movie's themes and structure, the less sense it makes.