Overwhelming dislike - based on 14 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 14
  2. Negative: 10 out of 14
  1. Reviewed by: Ty Burr
    Generic teen dice-and-slice with interior design by way of ''Saw." The movie's tight and reasonably well shot, though, and there are flashes of nasty invention between the ritual guttings.
  2. Reviewed by: Robert Abele
    A flavorless snack, time filler until "Saw III" and "Hostel 2" are served up.
  3. Reviewed by: Jeannette Catsoulis
    See No Evil devolves into an increasingly bloody and creative string of butcherings and impalings.
  4. 25
    Hippolyte subsequently reinvented himself first as a director of baroque erotic thrillers and then as music-video maestro to pop tarts like Britney Spears, but stalk-and-slash horror -- for all its porn-movie rhythms -- appears to have defeated him.
  5. Reviewed by: Felix Vasques Jr.
    A ridiculous messy Z grade film that should have been released straight to video.
  6. 16
    A punishingly awful slasher film with monosyllabic banter dreadful enough to make viewers yearn for the sophisticated repartee of earlier Dark efforts like "White Bunbusters."
  7. Grim, bloody and relentless, without even a spark of fun or intelligence, Evil is barely good enough for late-night cable.
  8. 0
    It's hard to believe that the distributors of See No Evil were so afraid of what critics would say about their movie that they refused to provide advance screenings. The movie's target viewers aren't the type who read reviews, if they read at all.
  9. 0
    Unlike former porn auteur Gregory Dark's semenal 1985 cumshot opus "New Wave Hookers", this rote exercise in slasher-film tedium holds zero surprises and is about as arousing as Tracy Lords' singing career.
  10. As the killer, who plucks out his victims' eyeballs, Kane, the seven-foot bald WWE wrestler who's like a modern Tor Johnson, is so inept he's more cuddly than terrifying.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 92 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 26
  2. Negative: 13 out of 26
  1. Jun 2, 2014
    I was reading the comments and I was like **** this movie looks horrible.But i watch it to see what kind of movie it was. And,i was really surprised because it's not that bad.I agreed the effects are really horrible but there is a lot of action and the actors were not that bad. Full Review »
  2. Oct 2, 2013
    Incredibly generic story supported by poor acting. Not scary either and not entertaining. I agree with critics 100%. This film is a piece of trash and not worth watching. Full Review »
  3. Nov 24, 2011
    Pretty terrible. Very poor visual effects and they didnt even try to make them look realistic. The horror was weak and the acting was terrible. Just another pathetic attempt at filmmaking by the WWE. Full Review »