- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: May 19, 2005
User Score
7.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 1045 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 768 out of 1045
-
Mixed: 91 out of 1045
-
Negative: 186 out of 1045
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SenselockeFeb 20, 20083
-
-
Apr 27, 20134
-
JonathanCJan 7, 20090If I could spit in this text box instead of writing anything, I would.
-
-
FatulousD.May 10, 20053
-
-
EvIlnIcESep 23, 20090
-
-
Nov 25, 20124As a fan of the first trilogy, I'm still forced to call this episode the 'best' of the second trilogy. Which doesn't help it much. A feeble attempt to 'bring things full circle ("The circle is now complete."???). Even the special effects seem hokey compared to the original 3 films. The only good thing I can say about this is that it's the last film in this set.
-
MarkM.May 20, 20050
-
-
JonW.May 20, 20054
-
-
AetonC.May 15, 20052
-
-
OptimusMimeMay 19, 20052What film are all these lovers seeing, or are they just so Star Wars obsessed that they can't, or won't, see the painful and obvious faults in this (and previous) prequels. It's a bad film, there's no other word for it, it's just a bad film. Wish it wasn't, but it is, and unlike some fans I won't pretend otherwise or blind myself to that fact.
-
-
CriticalJimMay 19, 20051All flash, no feeling.
-
-
JustinK.May 19, 20052
-
-
NigelV.May 20, 20052An over reliance on digital effects, poor acting and unconvincing plot leave meant this left me cold. The best thing i can say is that it's all over now - no more disappointments to endure, thanks George!
-
-
EricH.May 23, 20054
-
-
JasonB.May 20, 20053Mostly boring, it just drags on for about the first 75 minutes before it got interesting enough for me to wake up from my near sleep. Way too far to stretch to make much of this believable - maybe I'm above the intelligence level that this episode was aimed at. The conversion of Anikin to the Dark side was far too abrupt and lost all of its
-
-
DawnW.May 20, 20050
-
-
MichaelLJun 2, 20051What Craig A said, but I'll give it a 1 out of pity. What a shocker, all I can say is... NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
-
-
RicardoR.Jul 13, 20050
-
-
CharlieW.Feb 21, 20060Just a long string of saber fight after saber fight. Generally, I like it when movies actually have a STORY!!!! Shame on you Lucas...
-
-
JamesW.Apr 2, 20060
-
-
DavidTNov 2, 20054
-
-
LetheW.Nov 6, 20050If anyone thinks they should listen to a word Lucas says, I dare any fan to watch the episodes in order I through VI (as Lucas says he intended all along). The plot holes will be large enough to drive an entire deathstar through.
-
-
HenryWNov 8, 20051How did George Lucas think he could get away with this, and - more importantly - how did he get away with this?
-
-
AdrianK.May 17, 20053
-
-
StandaManMay 18, 20050
-
-
MissyK.May 18, 20054Just saw this with a bunch of friends, I probably liked it best out of the four of us, but even I thought it was a little 'weak' overall. I guess it was okayish, but I don't think I'd want to see it again. :)
-
-
ShareeseC.May 18, 20050Dud dud dud dud DUD!
-
-
JanosMay 19, 20053Star Wars Revenge Of The Sith mediocrity be thy name.
-
-
NateMay 19, 20052Hilariously ham fisted final installment. it'd be almost funny if it wasn't so monumentally disappointing. what a waste.
-
-
GazMay 19, 20054The fanatics and the blind faithful are sure to embrace it and forgive it it's many flaws, everyone else is just likely to come away kind of let down by the whole thing, as was I. Not terrible, but not really all that notable either.
-
-
B.J.May 19, 20051Public Enemy once said 'Don't Believe The Hype', I just wish I had listened. You got me again George. And while old Georgie boy doesn't seem all that much of a film maker these days, you've got to give him one thing, he's a hell of a marketeer. It's just a shame about the film.
-
-
HarryC.May 19, 20051Not just a poor film, a poor Star Wars film.
-
-
DeeMay 19, 20053Well, it's watchable. I guess.
-
-
RealBoredMay 19, 20050Like many, I remember being astonished by the complexity and grandeur of Star Wars. After seeing this film, though, all I can wonder is how much good George Lucas could have done for humanity if he would have invested the material resources he put into these three stinkbombs in schools, medical research and poverty relief. It's said you can never go back home. Please stop trying, Mr. Lucas.
-
-
ChickenGeorgeMay 19, 20050What a turkey, gobble gobble...
-
-
Jay2farMay 19, 20052
-
-
ClarkMay 19, 20053The epitome of average, empty headed almost-entertainment.
-
-
kaiU.May 19, 20053Just got back...*sigh*...that's really my only response. Totally JAP (Just Another Prequel).
-
-
LarryMay 19, 20051
-
-
RobertK.May 19, 20052Ended, these prequels, have. And Thank God! Yet another missed opportunity and massive disappointment from Mr Lucas. Die hards will love it (of course), every one else...
-
-
AngryDaytonMay 19, 20050Makes the last two films better my a$$, doesn't even manage to make this one better. So bad I feel ripped off and like I've been lied to. In fact so bad, it actually made me angry, and I never have that kind of response to even the most disappointing of films usually.
-
-
Adamd.May 19, 20050Way 2 over hyped, the acting was some of the worst and most bland i have ever seen.
-
-
JamieMay 19, 20052What a let down.
-
-
RobertMay 21, 20053One of the funniest films of the year. Too bad it wasn't supposed to be a comedy.
-
-
JamieM.May 20, 20053Honestly, if the movie wasn't a Star Wars movie there would be NO rating higher than a 5 here. It was terrible.
-
-
SandyM/May 21, 20052A truly boring piece of crap. Two amateurish and wooden male leads, talk, talk, talk, lousy editing, an inability to build tension. Best thing: when a monster space ship crash lands in the beginning of the film. That's about 30 seconds, so they owe $10.25!
-
-
KBMay 20, 20052
-
-
ZachMay 20, 20050Wow, that was a pile of sith.
-
-
JoshoM.May 24, 20052
-
-
ShaunD.May 26, 20051
-
-
ChristianB.May 29, 20052
-
-
CatGlassMay 20, 20052
-
-
GregLMay 31, 20052
-
-
RexJun 10, 20051Unless you're a Star Wars weirdo you should see right through all of the special effects to find a truly horrible movie. The dialog should push this movie into the comedy category and out of Sci-Fi Action. I actually laughed out loud during some of the
-
-
CraigA.Jun 2, 20050
-
-
MattM.Jun 3, 20054An improvement? yes, but lucas is a fool. some very cool "gimicy" scenes but some terrible decisions. the story is excellent and a much better film could have been made. it was relieving it wasn't aweful but still it was dissapointing. i feel sorry for Star Wars fans, it just should have been left alone, but i suppose once again there was money to be made.
-
-
scatsdJun 3, 20052
-
-
KurtS.Jun 6, 20052While I'm a fan of the original 3, I could not like this movie, even if I tried. Rather than list my reasons, I could cite the theater's audible groans and laugher--especially during the 'Darth Vaderstein' scene. It's a sad thing to witness the destruction of what was an engaging myth.
-
-
AliCJul 14, 20052
-
-
GeoffG.Jul 7, 20050A total and utter mess! what i don't understand is that anyone can say they hated episodes i & ii but LOVE episode iii...what gives? it's the same old garbage! bad acting, HORRIBLE script and video game special fx...i'm sorry but i don't get it.
-
-
TheConundrumAug 2, 20053
-
-
J.WFeb 6, 20070I think I'd rather watch cut scenes from a video game. This was atrocious, the plot and especially acting. How bad is Anakin's final 'nooooo!' when he transforms into vader? I just pretend the whole I, II and III triology never happened.
-
-
DaxNov 17, 20052It will take some mental exercises to erase this from my memory, but I think I might be able to like IV, V and VI again someday...as long as I can disassociate them from the prequels. Good...god.
-
-
SkullchristNov 8, 20050The rating I gave this movie represents the amount of effort Lucas actually put into the prequels.
-
-
joebNov 9, 20052I thought both of the lead actors were wimps. The acting over all is poor. The actors do not make you care about them or what they are doing. I was very dissappointed with this movie.
-
-
ZebC.May 14, 20050
-
-
ChrisDMay 18, 20054To quote Dan R (below), the "only problems were the acting and the script." But those are pretty substantial problems, if you ask me. The series has always been plagued by Lucas' hammy writing, lame dialogue and 2-dimensional philosophy, but that seems excusable for the 70s and 80s in a way it just isn't now. Eye candy bumps my score up a bit but overall this was disappointingly hollow.
-
-
HeidiD.May 18, 20054
-
-
JackH.May 18, 20051
-
-
PepperMay 18, 20052I wanted 2 luv it. I really really wanted 2 luv it bad! I didn't. It kinda sucked. :-{
-
-
DarthEricMay 18, 20053It's just another prequel. If you liked them you'll like this one too, if not... DarthEric.
-
-
NormY.May 19, 20053Visually rich. Emotionally barren.
-
-
JamesP.May 19, 20052In the words of Yoda: "disappointing, this prequel, is..."
-
-
DanielJ.May 19, 20053
-
-
SandraH.May 19, 20050I'm not a die-hard star wars fan, but the story and the fans deserved better.
-
-
YacketyYakMay 19, 20053If u want a feast 4 the eyes see it. if u want a feast 4 the mind or heart, look elsewhere. Make up ur own mind, but don't expect 2 much.
-
-
TimS.May 19, 20052I didn't like this movie at all because of the attrocious acting and dialoge. I decided to give it a couple of points becuase the FX are generally well done but I still miss the old days where CGI wasn't used exclusivly. Puppet Yoda > than CGI Yoda any day.
-
-
WILLIAMT.May 19, 20050
-
-
JoshuaM.May 21, 20054As everyone now knows, George Lucas is a terrible screenwriter and director, which may be why people are so symmpathetic to this last movie. More action and less awful dialog is a good thing, so is more fighting and less monotone line reading. But let's face it, if Star Wars didn't have street cred this movie would be straight to video.
-
-
LouisM.May 21, 20052I truly do not understand the mind of a Star Wars fan. They boast about how their hero, George Lucas, loved and recreated practically all cinema of the past, yet they refuse to believe that Lucas
-
-
RyanMay 20, 20054
-
-
BobbyK.May 21, 20051All in all, its a film that just doesnt have the magic of the originals. The ingredients are there, but the Lucas of 2005 just doesnt have the twinkle in his eye and spark in his mind that he did in 1977. This is Star Wars by numbers , without any of the charm of the originals.
-
-
JF.May 21, 20053Very disappointing...
-
-
PeterB.May 22, 20053Just as poorly conceived, acted and executed as the first two prequels. No, the third time is not the charm. Thank god this is the last one. We hope.
-
-
LauraH.May 20, 20054
-
-
MarkB.May 22, 20054Typically over the top, more effects than brains, stupid dialogue and really (and I mean REALLY) bad acting. Christensen is the reason, with his soulless performance, that this one gets a 4 from me. He was absolutely pathetic!!
-
-
BenMay 20, 20054Yes! Finally, the brutal end has arrived, and what a sell-out it was About as compelling and moving as a Streisand film; shame on you George. Let us go back to cinema inhabited by intelligent scripts, accomplished acting, reasonable motives, un-annoying characters, and imaginitive story-telling.
-
-
JudyT.May 22, 20051
-
-
BenB.May 20, 20053[***SPOILERS***] I
-
-
DanB.May 20, 20053What a shame. It didn't even look that good. I mean, each little detail looked fantastic but, all together... so much razzle dazzle for so little effect... except the end lava sequence, which was pretty kickass.
-
-
F.Fletch(UK)May 22, 20053
-
-
ThomasMay 22, 20051
-
-
K-DogMay 23, 20054The dialogue is boring and the acting is so bad it's laughable. The light saber scenes and gallactic war scenes would have been cool maybe five years ago, but now they're just expected and boring. We can't help but take them for granted. However there is one really good scene in the whole mess: the rise of Darth Vader is possibly the funniest thing I have ever seen in my life.
-
-
ScottS.May 23, 20051
-
-
GuyW.May 23, 20051Honestly, how can reviewers praise how satisfying it is that Episode III resolves the plotlines leading to Episode IV? All I can say is
-
-
EdH.May 24, 20052Action scenes where rushed, no epic battles tell the end. The rest are just long enough to say they where in the movie. The love story was just horrid. As a long time star wars nut the film was a major disapointment.
-
-
JoeT.May 24, 20053You might like this movie if you're either under 14 or if you're a grown man that brings plastic toys to the theater.
-
-
LordGreystokeMay 25, 20053
-
-
C.MasonMay 25, 20053Tedious. Action was good, but Lucas cannot write.
-
-
JohnnyFiveMay 25, 20052As a film, Sith makes a great video game. I wasn't sure if I had just slipped accidentally into someone's home theater. Between the giant space combat scenes and the giant lightsaber scenes there is scarcely room for a plot. Good thing, as I have seen better scripting in a video game. The only thing missing was the cheat code that gets me straight to the end.
-
-
88Only now can we truly step back and admire the full tapestry that it has taken George Lucas and his ILM wizards nearly three decades to weave.
-
90The final episode of George Lucas' cinematic epic "Star Wars" ends the six-movie series on such a high note that one feels like yelling out, "Rewind!" Yes, rewind through more than 13 hours of bravery, treachery, new worlds, odd creatures and human frailty.
-
90Emerges as the best in the overall series since "The Empire Strikes Back."