- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Mar 7, 2003
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
90The film is a strictly no-bull proposition.
-
80The movie remains engaging, with a couple of sequences verging on stunning.
-
80By turns morally compelling and racially paternalistic, this provocative drama may be the first halfway truthful war movie to hit multiplexes since "Three Kings."
-
75Until it descends into mindless routine action in the climactic scenes, Tears of the Sun is essentially an impressionistic nightmare.
-
75The film would be just as powerful, if less likely to saturate suburban megaplexes and flatter its patrons, were its saviors -- I don't know - French.
-
75Fuqua takes a genre picture and, by diverting the story onto an unconventional path, generates a sense of urgency. Tears of the Sun is not a great movie, but it is satisfying, and represents an example of accomplished filmmaking.
-
75Whenever its noble aims miss, Bruce Willis saves it.
-
75Fuqua and his writers, Alex Lasker and Patrick Cirillo, have delivered not only the most satisfying and plausible action movie in months but one that's accidentally timely.
-
70This is an odd amalgam of bleeding-heart sentimentality and over-the-top guts-and-glory action. You're not sure how to feel. But you're certainly not as moved and stunned as you were in "Black Hawk Down."
-
70Tears of the Sun may be a flattering myth, but its not a bad myth to be flattered by. [17 March 2003, p. 154]
-
67Left wing? Right wing? Center? Who cares, as long as Bruce Willis is saving the world.
-
63Fairly entertaining and often exciting, expertly done in a way, but not especially engaging or new, and not as emotionally involving as its title suggests.
-
60A schizoid action flick bogs down in lofty intentions.
-
60This is one of those pictures that unavoidably becomes part of the zeitgeist due to its coincidental arrival at a precise moment in history when its themes play into current events.
-
50The result is hardly a subtle film, but it has a stronger sense of combat's real costs and consequences than more sensationalistic pictures like "Black Hawk Down" and "We Were Soldiers" provide.
-
50Tried to turn this into a replay of its 2000 military-rescue hitBlack Hawk Down -- though, in the end, it's almost totally lacking in the serious hardware and viscerally paced action that propelled Ridley Scott's movie to the top of the box office.
-
50It's simplistic and reactionary and designed to get hearts pumping but not minds thinking.
-
50What pushes it above mediocrity is that it ends better than it begins.
-
50Unfortunately, it's not one-tenth as interesting as what you can see at home during a nightly cable surf as U.S. war policy is debated.
-
50The fiction that follows can be safely regarded as much more than a war movie -- hell, this is a pro-war movie. Were it a politician, it would be Donald Rumsfeld.
-
50Has honorable aspirations, even as it becomes mired in mainstream movie conventions.
-
50Fuqua has made three films before his newest, Tears of the Sun, and they've all begun well enough but then collapsed under the weight of his heavy-handed visual technique and his indifference to plot, character and logic.
-
50In a movie with so much graphic suffering by innocent Africans, its a bit disconcerting that so much loving attention is paid to Bruce Williss anguished mug. Theres an uncomfortable Great White Father (and Mother) aspect to this movie.
-
50Despite the busy camera work, bombastic score and rapt attention to violence, director Antoine Fuqua (Training Day) can't mask the script's white-savior paternalism.
-
50May make you weep, but not in the way anyone intended. Handsomely made, well-meaning but finally frustrating and unsatisfying, this perplexing film is an example of a previously unseen hybrid, the socially conscious, humanitarian action movie. It doesn't appear to be a genre with much of a future.
-
50At times, you could actually mistake Tears of the Sun for a blunt modern parable instead of an opportunistic mixture of up-to-the-minute atrocities and old-fashioned corn.
-
42For a film so intent on the rules of engagement, this is hardly engaging drama.
-
40Aside from a few routine battle scenes, the movie's action consists mostly of people slogging slowly through non-stop rain. This is not interesting, much less exciting. The dialogue is hokey hero blather.
-
40There's a fine line dividing Hollywood tradition and overly manipulative junk, and Tears of the Sun crosses it.
-
38A preposterous action movie in which a Navy SEAL makes the world safe for democracy one continent at a time.
-
30Impossible to swallow as truth, this Rambo treatment is equally hard to enjoy as escapism.
-
30Unfortunately, the movie's real setting is a sentimental fantasy world, and its story is a spectacularly incoherent exercise in geopolitical wish fulfillment.
-
25Director Antoine Fuqua (Training Day) can stage action, but he can't save a trivializing, reactionary script featuring a Hollywood star (read America) as a global savior.
-
20Its as deadly dull as the blunt end of a rifle.
-
20This "Black Hawk Down" theft is a trial by cliché until the climax, which suggests a dress rehearsal for the torching of Baghdad.
-
20Relevance can't rescue this would-be epic from the swamps of inertia, absurdity and sentimentality.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 22 out of 36
-
Mixed: 4 out of 36
-
Negative: 10 out of 36
-
10This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view.