- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75Cheerful and unpretentious.
-
60The true star of this film, funny and often breathtakingly lovely, Zellweger carries virtually every scene in which she appears -- which aren't nearly as plentiful as one might like.
-
You'll forget it tomorrow, but it's fun while it lasts.
-
50Feeble and formulaic.
-
50A pretty lame premise for a movie.
-
50The conclusion is a sweet bit of frosting on an otherwise unremarkable confection.
-
50The only thing more disappointing than a truly awful film is a merely weak one that has some really fun moments.
-
50Offers easy wisdom and light-hearted fun.
-
50A wildly silly goose chase.
-
40Its satire is too broad to carry much of a sting.
-
40Cutesy in the television sitcom sense.
-
Too bad the movie concentrates on the male point of view because it kicks to life when Zellweger is on screen.
-
38Out of place, out of time and out of its own cultural context.
-
38So unremittingly vulgar and inept it makes "The Best Man" and "Runaway Bride" look like masterpieces by comparison.
-
30Seriously undermined by its sour tone and an unusually charmless performance by star Chris O'Donnell.
-
30A remarkably mirthless and inept romantic comedy.
-
30Viewers have almost two hours to become thoroughly disgusted.
-
25It's up to O'Donnell to carry the show, and he's simply not up to the task.
-
25Painfully unfunny.
-
25A vapid, charmless update of Buster Keaton's 1925 film "Seven Chances."
-
25The mood is ruined by the bitchy 1990s stereotyping of the husband hunters.
-
25An innocuous waste-of-time.
-
20This is one movie best left unattached.
-
20Catalog of ugly female stereotypes and rotten jokes.
-
A flat-footed film.
-
10Hellish matrimonial misfire.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
There are no user reviews yet.