- Studio: Apparition
- Release Date: Oct 30, 2009
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 83 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 50 out of 83
-
Mixed: 6 out of 83
-
Negative: 27 out of 83
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JasonWNov 21, 20093Low rent Tarentino-esk rip-off with a thin plot and bad accents Whats with all the morons I've seen with VERITAS / AEQUITAS tats? Jesus, is everyone a *beep* slave to mass-media these days? I have nothing against tattoos, but if you are going to get one at least try to make it original.
-
-
WillO.Oct 30, 20090Complete plastic Irish drivel from start to finish. Sub-normal fans of the original will probably like it but anyone with an IQ in at least double figures will hate it for what it is. Hey Troy, I'll have a beer and diet coke, keep the change you fool, cheers.
-
-
MitchMNov 1, 20094This movie is mildly entertaining but lacks the punch of the first movie. The critics will tear this apart and I can see why.
-
-
BrianNNov 4, 20093Most people that liked BS will probably like this too, but it's pretty much just more BS. It isn't as bad as the first, but that might be because I expected nothing more than another ripoff of Guy Ritchie and Tarantino that required a very short attention span which is exactly what I got. Crap is worse when it catches you by surprise, and this time it didn't.
-
-
CoryPOct 30, 20090
-
-
TomINov 2, 20091
-
-
NickONov 8, 20090Anyone with a brain should pass on this one.
-
-
jackm.Oct 30, 20090Matt C. offers up a little gem of advice here. "Critics suck on sequels, listen to fans". Thats about as intelligent and profound a statement as you can expect from a Boondock Saints fan.
-
-
JohhnF.Nov 1, 20090Hey Matt C. I think you are forgetting Empire Strikes Back, Godfather Part 2, and The Dark Knight. Not all sequels are hated on.
-
-
RyanSNov 16, 20090If you like watching long meaningless scenes with just horrendous acting then look no further. This movie reminded me of one of those porns where you have to sit there furious with your dick in hand for 15 mins before you get to see the next hoe giving a BJ. But in this case the BJs are gun fights and most of the time the hoe turns out to be a tranny.
-
-
DumasRNov 2, 20090
-
-
BilBNov 4, 20090This movie is Boondock Saints 2. I wish someone had told me before I went in that this was a gay porn film. I don't have anytihing against gay porn films because some of my best friends are gay porn stars but had I known all the gay sex this film had featured I'd might have taken my date to something more appropriate like Basic Instinct, Silence of the Lambs, or Saw 6.
-
-
MaxLNov 14, 20093much inferior to the original. Many styles but no substance and it was repetitious as heck with the flashback within action. Good looking movie can't help the stupid story. The end was exciting but could have come a lot sooner.
-
-
RayBNov 17, 20092
-
-
Aug 16, 201011, for a good trailer. As far as the movie, a disappointment. After the first 25 minutes of it I cut it off. Bad acting, terrible jokes, typical story for a sequel. Its like if they were trying too hard to make it like the original, but couldn't hit the right notes. Definitly had the potential to be a very good movie, if it had good movie makers, but this is just another corny sequel.
-
Aug 27, 20100Quentin Tarantino has taken some more worthy **** than this movie. Even fans of the first one will find little to cling on to, and bad dialogue makes the already bad acting just plain horrendous.
-
Duffy's inept command of actors, not to mention his utterly juvenile morality and his comically clumsy use of religious iconography, should keep all but the diehards away.
-
Earns points only for being remarkably unself-conscious about its across-the-board ineptitude.
-
25An idiotic ode to macho horseshite (to employ an ancient Irish word). It is however distinguished by superb cinematography.