- Studio: Paramount Pictures
- Release Date: Mar 28, 2003
User Score
3.9
out of 10
Generally unfavorable- based on 70 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 30 out of 70
-
Mixed: 3 out of 70
-
Negative: 37 out of 70
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Mar 7, 20120The label of "science fiction" doesn't mean you get to do whatever you want and expect audiences to believe it.
-
prashJan 19, 20086The movie is science fiction proving scientific theories wrong still the movie is brought as a good job.
-
-
BillW.Mar 30, 20030Ok listen up! There is now way anything in this movie could have happened. They went to the Earth's Core. ITS 10 000 DEGREES!! The whole movie was a bunch of bull...t lies that didnt even begin to make sense! Worst movie of the year so far!
-
-
TYQBBMay 10, 20065Not a bad film, but the story is simply too stupid. Going to the core of the earth? That is total rubbish. However, at least there is some excitment.
-
-
TomG.Oct 9, 20038Admittedly, this disaster movie isn't for everyone but, for those who love a good sci-fi disaster movie, this movie is truly a hollywood spectacle. Definitely one to add to your collection.
-
-
JackieS.Apr 7, 20030Bring back Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea? Was this a spoof of that or was it really this bad? I couldn't take any of it seriously. It was absurd and laughable.
-
-
DemetriusJun 23, 20030What an embarassment? God awful!
-
-
AngelaC.Aug 30, 20076This movie is quite interesting.. But then it's really impossible for them to go onto the core!! their ship must have melt even if they're still on the mantle!! haha... but it really made me laugh!
-
-
JackMar 30, 20036Not a completely horrible movie, but fun enough to catch the "in-jokes" and pointed commentary at modern culture (see Rome); those gems were misguidedly enjoyed by my chortling, brash, and clueless fellow movie-goers who failed to grasp those nuances. Go see it anyway; it's worth the chuckles. Now I feel like a snob. Heh.
-
-
FantasyMar 30, 20030As I watched this all that I could think of was how did these actors accept these parts and how the professional critics suffered watching this garbage. This is too bad to describe. Just save your money.
-
-
LeeF.Mar 30, 20039
-
-
AaronApr 1, 20030This is too bad to even be believed. Avoid at all costs.
-
-
TheElusivePossomApr 16, 20036
-
-
CarolAnnApr 18, 20030Conceivably the worst movie of the year. It insults your intelligence and non-action would be a more proper adjective. The acting, directing, screenplay and special effects were simply appalling.
-
-
ZachApr 22, 20030Action Blockbuster??? How about laughable cannon fodder. It is terrible.
-
-
WendyApr 20, 20030Please tell me that I am dreaming and that this garbage was not released. How could these actors even speak their parts with a straight face? The Core is downright embarassing as every cheesy aspect was stolen from another movie; and painfully, poorly done.
-
-
DanN.Apr 4, 20038Any experienced moviegoer will be prepared for a cookie-cutter Hollywood movie with a ludicrous plot and outlandish special effects --and this movie lives up to the expectation. But you will leave the theatre very happy with its stellar cast, non-stop fun factor and surprising likeability. I expected sh.t but saw gold.
-
-
LassieJun 12, 20030After watching this drek all that I can say is "Oh my God" as it was that awful.
-
-
DerekW.Jun 23, 20032I think Jody means to say "its so bad its good". If you know absolutely nothing about science you might be able to swallow the crap they throw at you. I give this movie a 2 because some of the reviews made me laugh. Instead of seeing this movie, I suggest hitting yourself on the head with a hammer for 2 hours, it'll be less painful.
-
-
MollyC.Oct 6, 20078I really liked this movie. Sure, it wasn't as deep as "Truman Show", but it was gripping and the characters were better than in "Poseidon". And no, if you are a physical scientist, who just stumbled over this movie by chance: do not watch it! It is not the most truthful movie in the world! But then, which movie Hollywood ever produced was?
-
-
RobertH.Mar 30, 20031
-
-
LassiterP.Mar 30, 20030I have only one word to say: REFUND!
-
-
AmberMar 30, 20030This is so bad that I had to hold it in for fear of laughing. It is like watching a spaghetti western with dubbing except it is science fiction and it is their real voices. How the actors played this straight without cracking up is beyond all comprehension. I was waiting for Godzilla to drop in art any moment? You have been warned.
-
-
JoviMar 31, 20037Although it tries to be like ID4 and Armageddon, this want to be Jules Verne Journey to the Center of the Earth was not bad. It is cheesy and the science of it all is questionable, however, it delivers fun and good special effects. What really helps the film is the cast. Solid acting from most and the dialogue is at times quick and funny. Worth the matinee price, and worth the time.
-
-
ZekeApr 14, 20030Jack, Independence Day? That was one of the best science fiction movies ever made? The Core should only be so lucky? It is so bad that I envisioned the actors lining up while it was being made saying to the director "kill me next". It is a joke and very poorly made. Avoid at all costs.
-
-
DelvinD.Apr 24, 20030Who writes this crap? Absolutely one of the worst movies ever made. It is a total joke.
-
-
D.SaylesApr 27, 20032........Don't see it unless you are so bored you are going to kill yourself.
-
-
JanetS.Apr 5, 20030This movie is so bad that I actually thought that the actors would start laughing when they deliverd their lines. It is absolutely predictable and ridiculous. The special effects were a joke as was every other aspect of this production. Just a complete waste of time.
-
-
JousrheJ.Apr 7, 20032
-
-
BillyB.May 11, 20030Was this someone's expensive idea of a joke? It is too badly made to even put into words. Avoid at all costs.
-
-
AnnaS.Jun 26, 20030When was the last time these reviewers ever liked this crap?I will never get a chance to see any stupid movie like that again!!
-
-
TheJoyOfCookingGilbertMulroneycakesJul 12, 20037The concept's not bad - certainly at least 56% original - the execution, not so much. But as these sorts of things go, worse disaster movies happen at sea - Pearl Harbor, anyone? Perfect rental fodder.
-
-
GregT.Sep 15, 20037All nonsense, but fun nonetheless.
-
-
BitBurnSep 22, 20033KKKKKRAP Peanut Buttah!!! Even the no-name brand taste better!!
-
-
CharlesG.Sep 27, 20033Might make it to "mystery science 3000" before a broadcast premiere. preposterous. doesn't even qualify as a B movie.
-
-
JustineMay 12, 200610I loved it.
-
-
FurbydudeDec 14, 20077rated best for the amazing effects and twists and funny bits, but worst due to nonsensical bits which in fact, the mantle cant stop spinning for no reason at least it was good although somewhat scary. despite the plot holes and badly done bits, it was, in fact, AWESOME!!!!
-
-
HamishS.Mar 31, 20070Wow. I hope no one got paid for writing this. This has got to have one of the worst plots of any film with some of the biggest holes ever (no pun intended).
-
-
AlexandraE.Nov 4, 200810This movie was a fast. Quick, pace thriller. I cannot believe the awful reviews they gave tom this movie. I loved it. I really did. The Core showed me that everything that is impossible can be possible. Don't listen to the critics of those who just like movies with woman. Listen to me... You are going to LOVE it!
-
-
MarrachGMay 17, 20098After being initially disgusted by the sheer stupidity of this film, i've gradually come to love it for the same reason. No disaster movie is more memorable than this one; with the eye-poppingly bad science simply adding to the charm.
-
-
DracoB.Nov 14, 20033ALMOST as hilarious as "Reptilicus", with excellent special effects and a more apt cast, except Swank. You will laugh, I promise.
-
-
AdrianV.Mar 29, 20037"The Core" is a hard core good time film to start the blockbuster season on. You never feel that you need a PHD to understand the story or the screenplay to get what they say. The acting could of been better, but its not why we go to this kind of film. Stanley Tucci make you hate him by making the character a ahole. Saan Francisco getting distroyed was the best part of the film.
-
-
CantyE.Mar 31, 20030Any professional critic who gave The Core above 25 has to be suspect? This movie is completely devoid of anything approaching competency in the acting, directing, and screenplay. Even the special effects were cheesy. It is an insult to any person who watched this that possesses even an ounce of intelligence.
-
-
BunnC.Mar 31, 20038Ok, it had a few misses, but this was an ok movie. Somewhat credible science fiction, solid acting and a few fun moments.
-
-
JackApr 11, 20036Dumb but entertaining enough. Think Armaggeddon or Independence Day.
-
-
DavidK.Apr 11, 20030They left out two words before the title... Rotten To The Core would be more appropriate.
-
-
JodyMay 31, 20038
-
-
MelissaM.Sep 21, 20039This movie is no Armageddon, but fun nonetheless. First class B-scifi movie.
-
-
PatC.Jan 13, 20041Rotten to...
-
-
LindsayM.Apr 25, 200410I think that Hilary Swank really hit the spot. She is a good actress and she should get a golden globe for this.
-
-
TravisD.Jul 15, 20065I somewhat enjoyed this movie. I'm not very picky when it comes to sci-fi movies, but I think this couldv'e done a lot better, and I've lost a lot of respect for these great actors after being in a mediocre movie such as this. I think this a so and so movie that was okay, but couldv'e been much better.
-
-
StewartI.Sep 11, 200610I love this film. I don't care about the plot-holes and implausibility’s...it is action packed and pure entertainment.
-
-
JaredC.Dec 12, 20077
-
-
JamesApr 28, 20070This movie is the worst piece of shit I have ever seen in my life! i nearly fell asleep!
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
63So howlingly awful that it has unwittingly found a place in that elite group of films that can claim to be "so bad they're good."
-
60More palatable than most pictures of its ilk due to its keen awareness of its own preposterousness, a self-knowledge exuberantly expressed by a mostly live-wire cast.
-
50Elaborate misfire, which misuses an unusually good cast.