User Score
6.2 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 126 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 74 out of 126
  2. Negative: 44 out of 126

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. MikeW.
    Sep 9, 2006
    10
    Wow. This is what i call a GREAT movie. Good story line, great Special Effects, good actors and many fun!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. JeffK
    Sep 9, 2006
    2
    "The Covenant" is part "The Lost Boys", part "Zapped," nearly all predictable and has more cheese than Velveeta. Harlin has the audacity to set the film up for a sequel. I will be using all my critical powers to make sure that doesn't happen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. MaxM.
    Sep 9, 2006
    2
    Anyone who wants cheesy supernatural homoerotic b-movies needs only to rent any of David DeCoteau's films like "Voodoo Academy" and the "Brotherhood" series. "The Covenant" is a limp, better-budgeted knock-off. Skip it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. JimmyD
    Sep 9, 2006
    0
    This movie was such a waste of money. The lack of story, laughably terrible effects, and horrible acting make for the worst movie of the summer.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. Ape
    Sep 9, 2006
    2
    If you can't tell several of the last people under my comment are plants, then you're probably just as stupid as those people if they existed. Terrible movie, no plot, worst acting, and crappy fx. This is the kind of garbage that should kill hollywood and someday, I hope, it will.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. JonR
    Sep 11, 2006
    1
    This "film" is quite possibly one of the worst movies ever made. It was so boring and incomprehensible that it hurt. I went in expecting the male version of THE CRAFT...but it wasn't. This movie made THE CRAFT look like THE GODFATHER.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. Horrorview
    Sep 15, 2006
    0
    Absolute garbage. Like a Hot Topic commercial as directed by a chimpanzee with special effects by the guys who make commercials for local furniture stores. Renny Harlin is the original Uwe Boll.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. LaurenceH.
    Sep 7, 2006
    2
    Saw this at a free screening... and I felt robbed. Its seemingly cool plot quickly drifts into a bottomless pit of clichés, the CGI is pretty lackluster, the punchless ending simply blows and the acting is unsurprisingly tame. Some disturbing images and jump scares spare it from a zero because it's not completely devoid of thrust, but it still should've been straight-to-DVD.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. StevenS.
    Sep 8, 2006
    10
    Best movie I've ever seen, Except for Sky High and Undiscovered. This movie rocked. It had action, drama, and more action. All the actors were amazing. That guy from Trinbe is really good, I was pleasantly shocked by his out of this world skills.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. Christine
    Sep 8, 2006
    10
    For a teenage thriller I was surprised to see how much I enjoyed this movie; it definitely delivered. [***SPOILERS***] The special effects were amazing, especially in the final battle between Chase and Caleb. I was on the edge of my seat the entire time. The action sequences were very well done, but then again what do you expect from the producers of the Underworld? Exactly. Needless to say the guys were gorgeous, and that was an added bonus. All in all this movie had excitement, action, and even a little bit of romance. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. SteveB.
    Sep 8, 2006
    8
    Great popcorn flick! impressive special effects, beautiful cinematography, decent plot and acting. Don't expect it to 'reinvent the genre' but just sit back and enjoy a well done horror/action film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. JeffL.
    Sep 8, 2006
    10
    This movie was spectacular. GREAT special effects and a pretty cool story line. Overall, a TON of fun!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. KevinJ
    Jan 4, 2007
    1
    I'm giving this movie one star for some of the special effects and tantalizing near-naked shots of the women. Otherwise, this is possibly the worst movie ever made. Had a good premise but the director and scriptwriter dropped the ball. The ending leaves open the chance for a Part II. May GOD spare us the agony!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. HaleyA
    Feb 9, 2007
    8
    This movie was not great, but I liked it a lot for what it was. I really honestly enjoyed it, it was simply a fun movie to watch. I really wish that it would have been longer and they would have taken the story somewhere though. It seems as if they skipped right to the climax of the "plot" before it had any build-up at all. My guess is it's a perfect movie for 15-16 year olds to watch during a girls night. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. EmericC.
    Aug 22, 2009
    5
    It would've been a good movie they've been thinking a little bit more about the plot. Like in the beginning, why did the cops chase them? Or about the darklings?
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  16. isaz
    Oct 1, 2006
    3
    Just to be 'fair' here, i gave it some 3pts. only because it does have one of the coolest (note: i said 'coolest' not 'greatest') visuals and special fx in a film. that's not the focal topic why most (i'm inferring to intellect individuals, mind you..) are giving this flick a low-rating. here's my version: really weak storyplot. that, and decrepit characters. holy s--t, the tone just pretty much shows how Beverly Hills 90210 would've been like if they were on specially formulated steroids/birth control pills, and wallah, a bunch of casts who wishes to be as good as their way cooler more matured counterparts in the X-Men trilogy. sure, they have pretty faces alright. and what would those pretty faces be without 6 or 9 sex scenes? yep, its nothing more than a popcorn flick especially for the under-18 (well, mostly) EMOs you'll find on Myspace. haha! i thought i should slip this liner here, as quoted by some user at the IMDB forums: "I walked in with no hopes, and walked out with a better view" yep, you'll definitely have a better sighting to leave your seat once you realize your cash went to waste on how you could predict the eventual outcome of this movie. so do yourself a favor and save that $8 or 12 bucks for gasoline. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. PR
    Dec 30, 2006
    2
    What the hell happened to this... It spends a good half hour setting things up for what could be a really nice teen supernatural thriller, then its like they ran out of time or their was a strike by the script writers. It just seems to speed up just to get throught the basic need for character interaction to get to the end. Its like the studio said we want it out now, and it has to be 70 mins long or something. Its a real shame, as the guys who did the sets made everything look nice and set the mood real well, they seem to have taken a lot more care than everyone else did, the direction is awful, the casting is mediocre, soundtrack dismal. This could have been a new Lost Boys, or The Craft instead it ends up running like a tv pilot. With no script, and a plot written by dumb and dumber? Why the studio didnt make more of this rather missed opportunity seems beyond me, a waste of time and efforts all round. Could have given a whole lot of money to starving people in africa. If you are going to do something, why they hell not do it properly. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. ChadS.
    Oct 6, 2006
    3
    What would Paul Schrader's version of "The Covenant" look like? [***SPOILERS***] For starters, at least one of the magic-afflicted teens would die, and at least one teen would feel guilty about being a WASP. This film is so mild; it's as if the filmmaker made a horror film exclusively for pre-teen girls. "The Covenant" seems unaware that the bar has been raised by horror fans in recent years. It's neither nihilistic ("Saw"), nor atmospheric ("The Grudge"). The screenwriter instead borrows liberally from "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"(the same metaphor is used when Willow crosses over to the dark side). It also has too many plot holes (the discovery of evidence linking someone to a murder is never followed up), and too many male torsos (a locker room scene full...of guys!). Schrader would also remember that Caleb (Steven Strait), earlier, had warned a friend not to perform magic in public, and nix the scene in which our hero reconstructs a shattered windshield within close proximity to the cops. He'd also direct the pretty girl to scream, or at least wince, when meeting a potential father-in-law, who happens to have giant claws for hands. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. GerrickC
    Sep 10, 2006
    1
    We should make a covenant never to see this movie again. At least not in this lifetime, but maybe in hell. The movie is doused with Satanism, a few interesting parts, but utterly falls flat. Save your money you would have spent on a theater, rental, or- God forbid -purchase of this movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. SarahLohan
    Sep 11, 2006
    10
    YEAH!!! The Covenant rules! For me it's one of the best movies 2006. Cool action, nice effects and beautiful guys. Can't wait to see Covenant again.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. ChrisD.
    Sep 10, 2006
    6
    I actually had fun watching this film. While it wasn't great, it really wasn't too bad. The dialogue was decent for the most part and the acting could've been more convincing, but it all served its purpose. Though there were some really terrible lines. The soundtrack was particularly well chosen. The metal/industrial theme worked well with the cold palette used most of the movie. While the movie wasn't at all scary, it did make a noticeable attempt to add some suspense and chill. Like I said before, it's not perfect. But it really wasn't THAT bad. People tend to rate things to such extremes saying how everything is the best or worst they've ever seen with out even trying to see how something could be just decent. I recommend it. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. StevenB
    Sep 13, 2006
    8
    I enjoyed it. I don't go to a movie because someone says I should or shouldn't. There was intrigue, nice action and incredibly hot boys...what else do you want???
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. JasonL
    Sep 13, 2006
    1
    I'll admit it: I haven't seen the movie. But anything to negate the insipid viral marketers, whose truly lame attempts at aping the "astonished" voice of genuine fanboys present perhaps the only entertainment associated with this movies.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. Liane
    Sep 15, 2006
    10
    I loved it!! Yes it was cheesy, but I still really liked it! it left me with a smile on my face.. Great stuff!!! Cute guys. What more could you want?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. CalD.
    Sep 26, 2006
    1
    This is the worst movie I've seen in theaters. The only reason I was forced to watch this drivle was because I was too young to get into anything else at the theater. I 3/4 of the way through because the pure fact that ANYONE was trying to pass this off as a movie sickened me. Horrible acting, no plot, holes through the roof, and ultra predictable. Please do not support things like this being made. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. Ryencoke
    Sep 8, 2006
    0
    Why all these high ratings? This movie was stupid. The battle scenes were stupid looked brutal. The story line didn't really explain that much detail. I suggest saving your cash.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. DavW.
    Jan 15, 2007
    8
    I really don't know what all you people are complaining about; this isn't a really cerebral movie, it's just an action flick with good special effects, a semi-interesting plot and a cool fight scene at the end. I dont know about you but it delievers what I expected of it and it's not bad for an action flick.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. [Anonymous]
    Jan 25, 2007
    4
    C'mon, this movie was not as bad as the wicker man or little man. (here's a thought, just be glad there was no little wicker man) very predictable and trite, but not so bad that i could not watch or felt pissed at the end of it like wicker man. Just a mediocre movie with some eye candy for little girls and boys.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. ValerieP
    Mar 4, 2007
    8
    I thought it was okay but what helped me get through it was the cute guys and the locker room scene. :)
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. Ashley
    Mar 8, 2007
    10
    I really enjoyed this movie, i hope there is a sequel because it was thrilling and it had a great effects and the movie had a great plot.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. wolffang
    Nov 17, 2008
    10
    it was AWSOME!!!! i luved it the special effects where just WICKED!!!!! an the guys were so HOT!!! please make a seconed one
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. hannah
    Mar 14, 2008
    4
    This was the saddest thing i've seen in so long....the only reason i watched it (several times) is because the guys were hot. Chace Crawford had about 20 words in the entire film, Steven Strait and Sabastian Stan were basically the same character, and they basically just strutted around half naked blabbering on about nothing. By the end, i had no idea what was going on, and why everything was happening, i watched it over and over, trying to figue out what evreyone was talking about (and they did alot of talking) at the nd of the day, all you can really hope for is a strange movie where you don't have to concentrate, and can just stare at some eye candy for 90 minutes. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. LuisG.
    Sep 16, 2006
    6
    ....for some strange reason i was attracted to the kind of film i were to watch on a sunday night before work early monday morn. .... i was entertained not a great film but none the less not more or less than what i expected.. .... ready yourself for way to simple story and very good eye candy of actors ...
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. PaulK
    Sep 18, 2006
    7
    If you like this genre(which i do), this won't be groundbreaking, but definitely worth a look on video. The premise is intriguing and if a sequel does get made, there's definitely a lot of room for improvement with the storyline. The creepy spider type stuff should get canned in favor of more inventive spells or the exploration of more interesting aspects of their powers.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. KelliM.
    Sep 25, 2006
    8
    I liked it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. MichaelR.
    Oct 24, 2007
    1
    I liked the concept of the movie but it flat out made me disappointed.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. Cristine
    Sep 12, 2008
    10
    I thought the movie was good, Everybody is complaining how it should have been darker and more scary....But come on people, from all the Saw sequels GIVE IT A REST! I loved the concept of the power being addictive, and it aging the body. If magic were real I honestly believe it would be addictive to the big bads of this world. Can't wait till the sequel comes out!!!!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. Jon
    Jan 15, 2009
    10
    One of the best movies I've seen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. ConnorM.
    Dec 27, 2006
    9
    This might be one of the worst movies ever. That's why I love it. It has everything... teen partying... stupid fights... spiders... (GASP) near nudity.... oh yah... and boys making out. Yup. Boy kiss scene. I told you it was awesome.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. Nov 19, 2010
    3
    Epitomizing magic with drug use has never been more superficial than in The Covenant. The cheap exploitations of the young male and female bodies prove how shallow the film really is. The moral of the story is clouded by callow acting and the thrill is drowned out by flat lines.
  41. May 20, 2011
    0
    Unfortunately, I was dragged to see this on a date. It's angsty teen nonsense without a single defined element. Thankfully I've blanked most of the plot (what little there was) from my memory until only a grey indistinct blob remains (or perhaps that was what the plot resembled to begin with?) It's dire, truly dire.
Metascore

Overwhelming dislike - based on 16 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 16
  2. Negative: 14 out of 16
  1. 25
    It fails utterly as a horror picture, although it delivers plenty of PG-13-rated flesh and unintentional laughs.
  2. For the most part, the proceedings are slow, solemn and tedious.
  3. Profoundly mediocre supernatural thriller.