- Studio: Fox Searchlight Pictures
- Release Date: Feb 6, 2004
User Score
9.4
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 267 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 251 out of 267
-
Mixed: 6 out of 267
-
Negative: 10 out of 267
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Mar 27, 20120So disgusting and gross. I mean, I couldn't find a single idea this movies stands for. So far from the communist rebellion, all the characters could care about is their sexual discovery. What sens does all of this make ? Two hours of nonsense and disturbing sexual scenes.
-
TomW.Aug 4, 20043
-
-
JoshuaR.Feb 20, 20041Not that smart, not that beautiful, and not even that sexy -- it's an incoherent mess, condescending to its characters and to the entire era it seeks to evoke. The Washington Post review has it right. Really, it's just a cheap, nude, Parisian, watered-down version of a movie like "Easy Rider," which is actually about the '60s. This movie is just about nostalgia.
-
-
PaulD.Mar 2, 20053A muddled mess. Acting and story are unconvincing. There are some great clips from far superior movies, and a lot of nudity, without true eroticism.
-
-
50It wasn't as good as the films it cites, but at least it didn't bore me.
-
The film's real failure is that neither the story nor the characters capture the zeitgeist that Bertolucci theoretically set out to celebrate.
-
40Bertolucci is trying hard to shock us with this stuff, but, for all the perversities and the abundant nudity, the movie has an air of inconsequence about it. [9 February 2004, p. 74]