User Score
8.0 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 297 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 41 out of 297

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Aug 23, 2010
    10
    Living forever would be hell. Eternity claws at the heart of Aronofsky's temporally transcendent hero, Thomas. Hugh Jackman plays Thomas, but the character embodies director/writer Aronofsky's complex and insightful interpretation of what immortality means. Beyond humanity conquering time, this film tackles how ideas, and even feelings, can be inherently timeless. The Fountain courageously examines what keeps us here and why we eventually need to go. Aronofsky's ability as a director has been hailed with both Pi and Requiem for a Dream. The Fountain is unlike anything he has done before. He provokes audiences intellectually, spiritually and viscerally, but this time, with extra concern for plot and character dynamics. Like Fellini, putting his wife in his films compels a richer and more passionate creation. Weisz proves more enchanting in this sci-fi spirit quest than any other film to date. Instead of isolation and dependence, Aronofsky focuses on interconnectivity. A responsibility to his wife, new born, and devoted fans gives birth to a film that aspires to be something timeless itself. Aronofsky, more than anything, demonstrates how much he expects of himself. Moving within the millennia spanning the films narrative are the souls of Thomas and Izzi. They are tied to each other and the tree of life. Uniquely positioned as the tie that binds them to the tree is love. In every period, Thomas scrambles to save Izzi in some way. Thomas exasperatingly challenges the life threatening circumstances Izzi faces. Battling Mayan warlords, cancerous tumors or traveling to Xibalba(The Place of Fear) are dwarfed by the life purpose Izzi instills in him. The limitations of love and devotion are reluctantly acknowledged, as Thomas becomes a slave to hope and memory. The very essence of existence comes into play as fantasy is given as much legitimacy in the film as reality. The scenes from the Mayan period are melded together with the fiction Izzi is writing in present day. The line between truth and fiction disintegrates as the three stories continually intertwine. The motives of the characters are similar in each, but it takes the fantasy to provoke their destinies. Thomas's ultimate fate and acceptance of reality can only happen in surreal settings where anything is possible. The Fountain delves into the ineffable headfirst. Infinite possibility lies at the heart of life and death. One answer is as valid or invalid as the next without a map key. The closest we come to understanding it all is when determining what it isn't. Aronofsky posits the question as the answer stylishly, uniquely and profoundly. Expand
  2. Sep 14, 2010
    10
    This movie was absolutely beautiful. I just loved it so much. There's something fantastic about it, but it seems everyone doesn't get it based on some reviews I've read. I found The Fountain to be intense, emotional, touching and extraordinary. Like nothing I've seen before.
  3. Jan 6, 2011
    10
    There are no words to express what i felt after watching The Fountain, this movie is so beautiful in its own way it explores the man's greed for life and immortality. Excellently directed and perfectly acted movie. Aronofsky's a brilliant filmmaker Rachel Weisz is good Hugh Jackman gives a Bravura a career defining performance you can feel the pain of Jackman's Character :( . You should'nt miss this. Beautiful just Beautiful!!! Expand
  4. MansurS.
    Feb 6, 2007
    10
    It's a difficult movie at times, but with focus and understanding something beautiful emerges from the film.
    • 2 of 2 users said yes
  5. SamN.
    Mar 8, 2008
    10
    Like this year's Sunshine, The Fountain is a near perfect collaboration of performances, visuals, plot, and music. I'm surprised by some of the comments on here; it's not a very hard film to get. Jackman's performance is severely underappreciated, and easily deserved an Oscar nomination. The most underrated movie of 2006.
    • 2 of 3 users said yes
  6. IanP
    May 31, 2007
    5
    Unquestionably a bad film, despite its visual splendor. Not bad in a way you can sink your teeth into, bad for its incredibly vague, cloyingly sentimental, new agey, breathtakingly empty, pseudo-philosophical jibber jabber. Bad in a way that makes me suspect that the people who made it don't really know the difference between a powerful statement about life and death (however ambiguous: that is NOT the issue here) and a conglomeration of impressive images hung together on the feeblest and most pretentious of threads. Which would make this a horrof film, of sorts, but emblematic of an age that will doubtless be remembered above all for its sheer vacuity. Expand
    • 2 of 5 users said yes
  7. Nov 8, 2010
    0
    I thought The New World with Colin Farrell was the worst movie I would ever see in my life....then I saw this heap of steaming feces. If I could give it a negative score I would.
  8. RyanM
    Jun 2, 2007
    2
    Darren Aronofsky’s “The Fountain” wants to be a deep, thoughtful film. Unfortunately for the movie’s potential and its audience, it just becomes a muddled mess of ideas. There is hardly a conscious plot for this movie, and therefore it is mostly made up of endless allegories, impressive visual effects, and boring scenes where Jackman struggles to create dramatic effect. Rachel Weisz is scene-stealing as usual, but Hugh Jackman never really connected with his present day character’s feelings. Even though the film constantly repeats itself, viewers only leave the theater with a vague sense of what the movie was about. I’m sure that’s part of the reason why people were walking out of the theater. Expand
    • 1 of 3 users said yes
  9. killdarren
    May 8, 2009
    0
    Darren Aronofsky...a director who holds his audience or anyone for that matter, at absolute contempt. His films do NOTHING but divide critics and audiences and this pretentious hack is laughing all the way to the bank. Enjoy!
    • 1 of 4 users said yes
  10. ozp.
    Dec 2, 2006
    10
    If you like simple, plain stories that dont represent a chellenge for your mind then dont look at this movie.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  11. JayD
    Dec 3, 2006
    9
    A prime example of a movie that critics just don't get. It calls into question the intelligence of the people writing about it, particularly those who say Aranofsky's 'reach exceeds his grasp.' This is a complicated and assured film, one without easy answers. Everyone said these same types of criticisms about Kubrick films. The critical lambasting here just goes to show how little we expect from our films, how shocked we are when we're challenged by them, and how negatively we react when we can't understand them. Don't listen to the media static - see this movie. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  12. ChadL.
    Jan 3, 2007
    10
    While I can certainly say that for me, this is one of the best films I've seen this year, movies of this profundity and caliber really deserve consideration at the level of what movies I have *ever* seen that have been this good. While I have certainly spent a good deal of time deconstructing the film (themes, symbols, etc) I think thie real impact of The Fountain is as an experience, approached with the heart rather than the mind. But I don't mean to belittle the careful way in which Aranofsky has put this film together- its magnificence is abundant in all aspects of this film. Like other reviewers, I find it pretty shocking that so many people are panning this movie. I've read a number of reviews where it is obvious that the reviewer missed the whole point of the movie (not that it is all that complex), or took a too literal approach to the 3-part story line; I even felt that some wanted to trash the film in an attempt to be hip, by ragging on a hip new director coming into his own (transcendental meta-hipness?). And that's too bad, as they really missed taking in a marvelous movie. Expand
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  13. DianeR.
    Feb 13, 2007
    0
    This film poses as a education on alternative faith while borrowing fact from the Original. The Tree of Life is Biblical, but here it seems like it's alternative medicine. In dealing with the fact people physically die and our powerlessness to stop it will not be solved by diverting our attention to think powerful thoughts. The connection between the couple seemed beautiful, but time wasted on trying to be her savior instead of savouring their last momments was irritating and egocentric. In the end, it seemed like mind-trip escapism was the only thing left to do to cope with the loss. How sad. Expand
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  14. RonS.
    Mar 2, 2007
    10
    It takes a special kind of person to enjoy this very special movie, I can understand pepole who didnt connect to it's stand on love and death, and I can see why pepole are saying Aronofsky over-reached, but it is so beautiful and touching, the actors fill you up with a warming sensation, flawless work of cinematic art, a true masterpiece.
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  15. Crystal
    Jul 30, 2007
    9
    How do you explain let alone film someone's conscious experience? This film was excellent in that it attempted to provide visuals for the metaphysical experiences attached to loving, dying, and the character's own internal struggle. He never time traveled, the "time travel" sequences were a type of literary or visual tool to show the viewer how the character understood his role toward his wife's condition. Excellent and at times overbearingly touching. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  16. TedL.
    Jul 4, 2007
    9
    I'm truly amazed at how many reviewers COMPLETELY missed the boat on this one. Honest, heartfelt, mesmerizing, heartbreaking and WELL ahead of it's time, THE FOUNTAIN will undoubtedly be looked upon in twenty years time as one of the best films of the early 21st century. Man. Open your minds, people.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  17. ThomasK.
    Mar 17, 2008
    10
    For those of you who cast aside this work of art as nothing more than a pretentious 'art flick', you are sadly mistaken. It is personal to the core. Through the tellings of the three personae of past, future, and present, this movie brings to life the core essence of humanity and life itself. The pretentious ones are those who begrudge this film for the fact that what may seem a simple axiom to them was elaborated over the course of a 90-some odd minutes. The impact of this movie is not what could be summarized of this movie in a few words, but rather the journey the protagonists take throughout the course of it, as well as the visually stunning way the movie was brought together from end-to-beginning. This movie is only frustrating for those who become impatient watching water boil. For others, it expresses a true experience into the indomitable cycle of life. Those who say otherwise are the pretentious ones. Expand
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  18. JesseS.
    Apr 10, 2008
    10
    Awesome. One of those movies you can watch over & over again, or, like the director says, solve differently a la rubik's cubism.
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  19. pg
    Sep 10, 2008
    10
    It is a little like trying to explain why you like your favorite food. This happens to be the kind of film that is my "favorite food." I don't understand the viciously hostile reviews by some critics of this movie other than to suspect that some folks haven't gotten over the whole "Mom made me eat my vegetables" thing. Hey, I used to hate onions and now I love them. I have watched this film many times and I love it! The movie is not hard to understand unless you say so (because it can be understood however you want to relate to it). It is not trivial or contrived unless you say so (if you think you're having a bad day - you probably are). It is definately not as good as Picasso painting a portrait of Shakespeare while humming a Beatles tune, but then again...that never happened anyways (that I know of). Best served with wine and chocolate, and a loved one (preferably warm, not a plant, and still in this current plane of existence) There -- that's a sufficiently symbol-laden, mini-review in keeping with this movie's style. Expand
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  20. Alexandra
    Jun 10, 2009
    10
    The fact that this movie got such dismal reviews is a testament to how emotionally and intellectually dead the general populace is. This movie doesn't follow the conventional formula that is palatable to the average viewer. History has demonstrated time and time again that masterpieces are rarely understood and appreciated at the time of their debut. The Fountain is one of those masterpieces. Only those viewers who are willing to take the poetic beauty of this film on its own merits will understand this movie's evocative emotional power. Aronofsky has created something rich and sensuous; the spectacular visuals, the incredible score, and the complex story overwhelmed me to such a degree that I sometimes had to remind myself to breathe. I can't get this movie out of my head, and that is a beautiful thing. Expand
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  21. howellg.
    Nov 22, 2006
    1
    A visually interesting film cannont compensate for inane dialogue. The level of writng seems appropriate for a high school project. A major waste of time.
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  22. WillR.
    Nov 30, 2006
    9
    A gorgeous movie; atypical Hollywood narrative. Has to be viewed more as a parable or a visual poem, though the acting is phenomenal (Jackman should win best actor for this). Alludes to Solaris, 2001, Herzog, Buddhist philosophy, various other religious icons and themes. Not an easy movie, but deserves much more praise than it has gotten.
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  23. JessicaG.
    Dec 4, 2006
    9
    “The Fountain” is another fantastic piece of art and cinematography from Aronofsky yet again. The visuals are intriguing, the camera angles were one of a kind, and use of light, sound, and lack there of, was brilliant. The plot really challenges the mind and makes you think. If you don't like thinking while watching film, this movie isn't for you... But if you like to be intellectually stimulated, then by all means see this beautiful film. Expand
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  24. MikeC.
    Dec 8, 2006
    0
    A turgid, pretentious, pseudo philosophic mess. Nothing here is credible, nor moving or interesting. Dialogues are often ridiculously laughable. Simply because they won't be able to understand the movie, or because they will be fascinated by the "visuals", some "intellectuals" will say it's brilliant or fantastic. It's completely shallow and poorly written. The "oeuvre d�39;art" of a fart. Expand
    • 1 of 2 users said yes
  25. JamesT.
    Apr 3, 2007
    10
    Darren Aronofsky film captures many facets of human emotion and coming to terms with death and all that may mean to us.all of this is not easy too think about let alone portray but just for sheer thought provoking beautyfull cinematography and music it wins hands down.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  26. MixsyG.
    Apr 8, 2007
    10
    I loved to watch The Fountain. Finally someone expresing openly in a movie those allways Human-Spiritual issues that we are IN and we will, liking it or not. I enjoyed it cause also is reach in simbolism and it gives the unique interpretation for each detail. And as other comment i read here i think "It takes a special kind of person to enjoy this very special movie"
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  27. JImmyH
    May 27, 2007
    10
    Terrific film! It's magical, hypnotic, breathtaking. I was left confused yet intrigued and wanting to find out more and search. It's hard for me to understand why so many critics are panning this movie. I mean, with movies like "Spiderman 3" scoring better on Metacritic than "The Fountain" I am left scratching my head. Do the critics hold Arnofsky to a different standard? My opinion is that with all of the trash that is heaped into theaters these days, we should appreciate when a movie like this comes along. Some may find it flawed, I don't doubt. But should we not give credit where it's due? Anyway, I thought it was a true work of art and will watch it repeatedly. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  28. roxwordroxword
    Jun 29, 2007
    9
    Sometimes I'm amazed by all the closed down minds on this planet. this film is a love song, a deep tone poem about mortality, heart, soul and science and their relationships to each other. perhaps that's too much for the average viewer to absorb, but this viewer could have watched another 2 or 3 more hours of this. I'll probably end up buying it and screening it over and over and then I'll wish I had given "the fountain" a ten. don't miss it. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  29. JeremyS.
    Jun 30, 2007
    10
    One of the most powerful films I've ever seen. Please don't hate it if you do not understand it. Give it a chance. Try it again. Listen to Ellen Burstyn's speech in the scene in the snow; it as well as Jackman's obvious revelation toward the end of the film are the movie's seminal moments and nicely sum up its themes. This film isn't merely a love story, it's a story about death, love, peace, and facing mortality. It's about living well and dying with a measure of grace. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  30. JeremyB
    Jun 30, 2007
    10
    This movie touched me. It may not have touched other's but just as any work of art - some may understand and some may not. It's really just a matter of personal preference and style. I can see why some of you folks think it was a bad movie in some ways. For me it was amazing. I will also say it bears being watched multiple times in order to fully grasp the imagery and plot to the best degree. I enjoy movies that you need to and want to watch more than once to understand. I gave it a 10 because it is my new favorite movie and will be for a while until something else comes along...and with so many of the movies in the past years being just the opposite (shallow, uninteresting and overdone) it may be some time. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  31. Ryan
    Jun 3, 2007
    10
    I think the director was trying to send a heartfelt message about love and life, and that those touched by it would enjoy this film, and that's why I give it a 10, it's a matter of opinion, you don't have to be so uptight mr. "Anonymous H".
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  32. NikolaK.
    Jul 7, 2007
    10
    Great movie.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  33. JustinG
    Feb 1, 2008
    9
    The Fountain is a 'love-it-or-hate-it' sort of film. It has only one undeniable quality: it's beautiful. Color and texture come together beautifully; the dark, rainy Mayan jungle, the snow-covered fields of modern America, and the Orion Nebula's golden nuclear rain are breathtaking to behold, especially in HD. Unfortunately the film tries to answer questions that some people go to church for, so those with strongly-held beliefs about the nature of life, death, and God might end the film feeling confused, threatened, even offended. Those of us who, like Aranofsky, are looking to reconcile the illusory conflicts between science and spirituality will likely find it an intensely rewarding experience. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  34. DanielH.
    Jul 27, 2008
    9
    Wow! Incredible film, really. The more I attempt to analyze it, the more I am reminded that this is a love fantasy. It is like a 10th century French poem depicting chivalry and mortality. Beautiful.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  35. DarenB
    Jan 23, 2009
    10
    Deepest movie I've ever seen, very philosophical.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  36. MichaelH
    Aug 19, 2009
    10
    Death is the road to awe. Beautiful. An exceptional piece of emotive movie making. The visual effects take you to a different plane and it's breathtaking. Hugh Jackman outshines everyone in his role and truly reaches outt o his emotional and soft side. An amazing picture of love and the lasting hold it has on us.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  37. HorenS.
    Nov 21, 2006
    10
    I was lucky enough today to be able to catch The Fountain at the film festival downtown. To start off, I have always been a huge Aronofsky fan, I introduced my friends to Pi and Requiem, and they are two of my favourite movies. From The Fountain's inception in the early 2000's, I have followed all of its foibles and developmental issues. The script was originally approved with Pitt and Blanchett to star in the leading roles. Pitt left to film Troy and the project was thrown on the back burner. In 2004 the film re-emerged with a budget half of the original and was cast with Jackman and Weisz. As is expected when one follows things for such a long time, excitement builds and there is always the wish for what you are about to experience to be spectacular. This is one of those instances where one is awestruck and that excitement has not been crushed by the feeling of disappointment. Without a doubt, The Fountain by Darren Aronofsky is one of the best films I have seen this year, if not one of the best films of the decade. Future viewings and time will tell if the latter holds true. I'm not even sure where to begin, essentially the plot is set in three different time periods, with Jackman playing a conquistador, a modern scientist/doctor, and a intergalactic voyager all while trying to find a way for Weisz to live as she is terminally ill. The visuals in The Fountain are dazzling. The cinematography is some of the best I have ever seen in my life. The shots are all perfect and the lighting immaculate. Aronofsky seems to have gone with mostly centered shots, which may sound dull at first glance, however, they most definitely are not. It is not as gimmicky or manipulative as Requiem or even Pi were, but the visuals could take your breath away. They are that stunning. To make things even more impressive, they chose not to use CGI for much of the film and instead filmed chemical reactions and formations on petri dishes and were able to extrapolate that into fantastical imagery. As far as the acting goes, this is without a doubt the best work of Hugh Jackman and while Rachel Weisz is also very good, it is mainly Jackman that carries the movie as he is the lead role. I actually enjoyed the rest of the supporting cast even in their small roles. Specifically, Ellen Burstyn, Mark Margolis, and Cliff Curtis. The musical score is just another thing on its own. Clint Mansell, having collaborated in the past for both Pi and Requiem for a Dream creates a most ethereal musical score. The Kronos Quartet, who had the theme song for the movie Requiem for a Dream, entitled Lux Aeterna, and Scottish post rockers Mogwai fill out most of this blissful soundtrack. The music meshes wonderfully with the movie even though there are, three different periods so to speak. Furthermore, the explosions in music, re: Mogwai and the whole post-rock genre completely gels and interlaces with the revelations experienced and ideas expressed within the film. I won't reveal too much as to what unfolds in the movie, however, it is a beautiful story of love, and what one discovers about himself and the world in this quest of undying love. There are so many facets, so many nooks and cranies that this film dares to explore all at once in such majestic fashion it is truely unbelievable. It connects emotionally with the viewer, my heart started palpitating at various points and near the very end my eyes watered up for a good five minutes. Aronofsky explores my ideas and themes in this movie, though the main ones I think are acceptance and duality. The movie is incessantly deep and heavy and therefore requires repeated viewings for sure. Those of you who have seen Pi, this is in many ways a sister movie to that. Just as Pi attempts to understand natural surroundings and life through mathematics, The Fountain follows suit but on the path of spirituality and philosophy. In closing, I still require many hours to ponder the ideas in this movie, in fact I have been watching the trailer nonstop since I got home. Aronofsky possesses immense testicular fortitude to be able to make a film like this for wide release. He has my utmost respect for attempting such an ambitious film that has come across to me at least as highly successful. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  38. MichaelS.
    Nov 23, 2006
    10
    Just perfect. But make no mistake, the film is just relentless. Relentlessy cheesy, deep, melodramatic, over-the-top, unflinching, unashamed. There were two specific moments in particular, where all the people sitting directly around me in the theatre started laughing. One of those moments, was the climax. Had there not been "intellectuals", artists, art-house filmgoers, mainstream filmgoers or immature emotionally undeveloped people in the audience, I would have enjoyed it even more without people around me laughing at the brilliance onscreen. That being said, it definitely felt like Aronofsky deliberately went out of the way to make a film that very specifically panders to not a single demographic or crowd. It completely depends on the person. But generally, I think most artists intellectuals and art-house cinemaphiles (and especially critics) will absolutely loathe this movie, because it is relentlessly emotional, and completely unashamed. But the themes and concepts, the imagery, it is so cyclical, and all fits perfectly together. I can easily wait 6 more years for Aronofsky's next film, because then I know it'll be at least half as good as this incredibly moving piece of work. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  39. DrewK.
    Nov 26, 2006
    10
    Incredible. Both Hugh Jackman and Darren Aronofsky deserve Oscars, to say the least.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  40. GrahamB.
    Dec 26, 2006
    10
    This is one of the best films I've seen in a LONG time.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  41. MichaelE.
    Dec 3, 2006
    10
    This film doesn't place the answers right in front of you, but it is a mystery easily solved by audience that cares about the characters. This isn't hard to do, as it has great acting, wonderful visuals, and excellent pacing.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  42. DW.
    Dec 7, 2006
    7
    You have to give this film high marks for aspiration, even if it fails to be truly engaging. At least Aronofsky isn't parlaying his success into making competent sequels of comic book movies, and is trying to move us forward. Beautiful, elemental, just maybe too many closeups of earnestness rather than people nakedly engaged in the struggle. Next time, Darren. I'll be there.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  43. MeredithL.
    Dec 7, 2006
    9
    I thought that this movie speaks to Aronofsky's daring filming techniques. I think that he really sets the bar for other directors to live up to.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  44. DavidD.
    Jan 13, 2007
    10
    Alas, the majority of critics are too Hollywood oriented to know genius when it stares them in the face. Mindblowing and beautiful, this movie will make you think too.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  45. JeremyWillmott
    Feb 11, 2007
    8
    This movie is gloriously pretentious and unapologetically incomprehensible, being mired in philosophy and religion. Most of the movie goers left scratching their head or laughing. For me though this movie was a lot more than that. It is flawed for sure. But the essence of the message is something that resounds deeply within me. Gorgeous art direction and underpinned by a sumptuos score by Clint Mansell, this film is a must for film fanatics. It feels much like the personal movies of the 60's. It explores themes of love, death and immortality whilst touching on old testament stories such as the Tree of Life from the garden of eden (the other tree was the tree of knowledge that Adam and Eve ate from). If The Fountain doesn't leave you chattering about the meaning of life you probably shouldn't have gone to see this movie in the first place. It is cerebral. It is challenging. But ultimately very rewarding. Did I mention it was beautiful to look at. Check out my full Aronofsky review over at tweenbetween.blogspot.com Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  46. HenrikO.
    Mar 29, 2007
    8
    Criticism was also hard on Kubrick's "2001" in its day. I wonder whether there is some connection to this, another wildly philosphical piece of film art, and its criticism - similar to "2001"'s - and again, not supprisingly enough, by old farts.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  47. RobertTheBruce
    May 14, 2007
    10
    It never ceases to amaze me how hypocritical movie going audiences can be. For years we hear people complaining about how movies are too formulaic, predictable and narrative like. But when a movie, that truly reaches beyond the conventions of the typical Hollywood blockbuster finally comes forward, it is shunned, as people flee back to their tried and true formulas and trilogies. This it seems is the story of the Fountain. The film is truly a work of art, combining some of the most beautiful cinematography and music yet seen in a movie theater with an idea that is so simple, so common place, but at the same time so utterly life changing. Like the theater of Brecht, the Fountain is not so much about the narrative, but how what we are seeing communicates to us. It is for this reason that i feel the movie has had such a bad showing. The ideas its presents are so raw, so completely human, that it is hard to see them presented to us in this fashion. The ideas, for for average movie going joe, are to big and at the same time, close to heart to contemplate in a movie theater. For this reason, the Fountain should ONLY be seen by those who are able to watch a film without everything being spelled out for them, and by those intelligent enough to analyse the films message and how it is conveyed. Is truly one of the most original, innovative and moving films for a long time. 10/10 Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  48. SeanD.
    May 18, 2007
    10
    Every time I watch an Aranofsky movie, it is a life-changing experience. There's something about his style of writing and filming that is extremely memorable. Even with it's focus on death, I left this movie extremely uplifted. I can't get it's visuals out of my mind & can't wait to watch it again. Not many movies these days challenge thought and ideas. I can';t believe the critics pounded this one. A memorable, beautiful movie, but I guess it's not for everyone. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  49. JohnB.
    May 18, 2007
    8
    Movies this deep don't deserve to be seen by people who don't wish to better understand it and what it stands for. This movie is really something to wrap your head around and it even leaves enough room for imagination left for the viewer. The visuals in the Fountain are an absolutely stunning work of art. Now I could easily call this movie pretentious yet at the same time without that pretense, there wouldn't be much to see here. My only complaints of the Fountain were the excessive amounts of scene changes which I felt were not properly executed, and the poor script that neither worked for the characters or for the audience. Those mistakes alone take this down a notch from being truly exceptional but a movie of this magnitude deserves to be seen provided you are willing to go into it with an open mind. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  50. HIramG.
    Jun 11, 2007
    6
    Director added too many things that takes you out of the main theme of the movie.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  51. kal
    Jul 15, 2007
    10
    Awesome, what movie making should always be about. A breath of fresh air from the generalized Hollywood empty headed easy to follow simpleton movies. If you think Die Hard or Rambo are good films then don't bother with this. If you are a free thinker and crave artistic expression at its finest then this a film for you. I get the impression the bad reviews are from people who A: don't understand it or B: are not the type to think beyond the mundane. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  52. NIN
    Jul 24, 2007
    6
    I give it a 6 for making me feel like I had some barbiturates. The concept is amazing but unfortunately it was not captured in the film. It would have been a better film if they stuck and focused on one lifetime. I bet Hugh Jackman himself didn't know what his own film was about. It was crazy, a big mess and a definite waste of time. I could definitely live without watching this film in my lifetime. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  53. NaniFaye
    Aug 18, 2007
    10
    This movie involves some of my most favorite themes and interests - the tree of life, the Mayans, scientists, new medicines discovered from plants in the rainforest, books, the acceptance of death, the fight against death, hope, peace, and space travel. One of the primary dynamics in the movie is the contrast between the man who is spending all his time and energy trying to find a way to keep the woman alive. One wonders if perhaps his time was better spent by spending time with her, listening to her, loving her, and just being with her in her final days. To me that is the crux of the movie, and I felt it deeply - her acceptance of death, and his fight against it (and essentially against her in a way). I have not stopped thinking about this movie since I watched it, and I absolutely love it. For me, and I understand for many others, it is the epitome of beauty and depth. And yes, in the end some things didn't add up, and the "lotus position" was hokey for sure - meditation does not involve any physical posture, it is an inner state of being (but how to show that visually? Then again, the first time I watched the movie, I thought the space bubble was in fact the man's inner state of being, portrayed visually, and was a not a "real" place but a representation of what was in his head...who knows...). But the heart was there and the intentions were good, even if the portrayal of the themes was not perfect - but who has done this and these themes before any better? I must say also though that my own life experiences and background and interests had a profound effect on the way I received this movie. So many of the visuals, the themes, and the ideas are so embedded in me that if the movie were based on some other visuals and themes, I might not have really liked it at all. (Botany, Medicine, Anthropology, Space Travel, Meditation, and the death of a Beloved). Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  54. NickA.
    Aug 20, 2007
    7
    Darren Aronofsky, through his long and tedious struggle to bring his most cherished script to the screen, had accumulated some serious hype around what would eventually become 'The Fountain.' Just under seven years from its conception in the mind of the film’s young leader, Aronofsky’s richly imaginative story of everlasting love, biblical symbolism, mortality, and boundless metaphysical possibilities hit the Cannes Film Festival with divided acclaim. [***SPOILER***] 'The Fountain' starts with a 16th century Spanish conquistador named Tomas (Jackman), who appears to have come across a hidden temple, which rightfully rests amidst the thick ripe foliage of the jungle’s core. Subsequent to the slaughter of his miniature battalion, Tomas fights his way through a heavy pack of temple guards, then climbs a steep slope of stairs to reach his desired pyramid’s peak. Upon scaling the tall side of the lost temple, the film takes a spontaneous turn into a world of wondrous nothing, where we find a clean-shaven Hugh Jackman in an ecospheric-like bubble, floating toward a golden nebula in the vast realm of outer space. Just before the film could possibly become any more confusing, it swings back to a present day world, where oncologist, Dr. Tommy Creo, has been sleeplessly perusing the potential effects of the contents of a tree in Guatemala, which could stop the continuation of cancerous tumors and rejuvenate their victims. Of course, what would this “love story” be without the dying, cancer-stricken wife to motivate the tormented scientist-husband? The premise of the flick, being as dubious as would potentially seem, never reaches a melodramatic staleness; in fact, it prospers from its simple, yet intricate, story of undying love. In little time, 'The Fountain' saves itself from disaster, as it finally comes together, piece by piece, and finishes an open-minded work of art, rather than another box-office blunder. Aronofsky’s intentions envelope in the thoughts of each viewer, as the journey closes with doors that remain open; and do so in a semi-satisfying quest to provoke questions and lengthy discussions with all movie-goers who shared its viewing. The positives of the picture bask in their gorgeous surrealism, and flow through viewers with poetical sage. Captained by its veteran actor, Hugh Jackman, and supported well enough by Academy Award-winning actress Rachel Weisz, the ostentatious ship of visual wonders that was 'The Fountain,' succeeds as a summer trip to the movies with its unmatched creativity and fine direction; from the only director who could have pulled off such an inspired article in an over-expensive, mostly uninspired, era of cinema. To unleash one’s intellectual inventiveness is to see 'The Fountain;' dismissing any flaws in film-conception and appreciating where it all came from. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  55. TroelsS.
    Oct 19, 2008
    7
    I have got to say, that the music is the reason why I really like this movie. Yeah, the film itself is different and pretty (and I respect the director and writer of The Fountain, cause it's so easy to follow - a film like this can easily lose focus), but especially the music supports the scenes in a perfect way. Clint Mansell might be the one of the best filmsoundtrack-makers of the decade. But I'm not saying the movie would be bad without the great soundtrack, cause it's a really touching movie, which deserves better grade by critics. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  56. ArturoL.
    Dec 7, 2008
    10
    It´s pure poetry and beauty. Probably you won´t understand ALL the movie, but you will feel it.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  57. JimS.
    Feb 18, 2008
    9
    I look forward to one day seeing the complete, uncut film.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  58. EthanK.
    Mar 29, 2008
    10
    You have to be a very open minded person to truly enjoy this film. This movie truly demonstrates that you don't have to introduce a character to know who he is. I don't know how many movies I've seen that starts out like,"hi, my name is..." the plot is very simple to tell the truth, its about a man in a struggle to come to terms with death, not just his wife but himself as well. This movie is indeed very hard to put into words. I can understand that a person may not like this film, no movie is loved by everyone. But I don't think that gives them the right to make biased opinions to a very under appreciated work of art, that they don't even understand in the first place. They could have simply said in the review,"I didn't understand the movie and cant make a comment." Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  59. BertS.
    May 22, 2008
    9
    A sensory masterpiece intertwined with deeply emotional storylines (esp. if u ever spent time with a loved one with cancer) with an overall sci-fi fantasy blanket. Wayyyyy too ambitious but if you're in the right mood - it will take you somewhere special.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  60. RR
    May 3, 2008
    10
    The Fountain is a spiritual film that eschews most trappings of what people expect of a movie these days. If you're looking for easy-to-chew-n-digest fluff, you won't find it here. If you have an open mind, you should be prepared for a beautiful and moving work of art that features two actors at the top of their form. The central theme is transcendence, and although the film plays with three time periods, representing superstition, science, and spirituality as a symbol of mankind's progression (in a hopeful, Nitzschean sense), it is not bound to that kind of structure. Ultimately, it transcends space and time to remind us of why we are who we are: because of our undying souls. The symbolism may be Buddhist in nature, but the films' essence is as timeless and non-religious as one can hope for. To all you critics: I sympathize. You have a lot of work to do, and to encounter a film that leaves you scratching your heads must be frustrating as hell. But don't pan something just because you don't understand it. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  61. RobertZ.
    Aug 24, 2008
    10
    You truly have to be open minded to comprehend this movie. I have watched this masterpiece about 4 to 5 times and every time I watched it I would discover new ideas, metaphors, symbolisms, realizing more and more clearly what message the director is trying to convey. This aspect alone points to the artistry of the movie. Music of Beethoven, Mozart, Bach, Chopin works precisely the same way. This masterpieces of music grow on us over the years and every time we comeback to them with new experiences we discover something new in them. Thats what makes piece of art work timeless. On the top of this Aranovsky is a visual artist his movie is a visual Odyssey that adds to the viewers imaginative delight and conveyance of the essence of the movie. One examples: the ring that gets lost, when his wife collapses and he walks in circle waiting, to the glass sphere he is traveling in, to the tattooed lines on his body that circle around like the trees rings, to finally the the being that enters the (cicrcle) the sphere of light to finish the journey. This are all symbolic representations of reincarnation and repetitive events of our lives that just manifest themselves in different transmutations. In addition this movie is a rare gem because of the topic the director chose. Most of movies now a day focus on violence and the dark side of the human nature and even the so called good characters have very little good in them. Here Aranovsky portrays many faucets of human nature but the strongest highlight is the human spirit the soul of the human being. Its about our highest possible expression, transcending our physical illusion that are so real to us and entering our final stage of enlightenment that sheds the mortal suffering because of the realization of the highest truth about our true nature. In my book Aranovsky is one of the best and most brilliant movie directors alive. I have seen all his movies and when I went to see the fountain it was because of his earlier movies that I saw. With every movie he created his artistic expression is truly transcending to new heights. Mr. Aranovsky please keep creating and delighting your audience. Cheers. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  62. DavidM.
    Sep 28, 2008
    9
    Completely polarizing - and I certainly know why. But, beautiful, intelligent and nothing but ambitious from start to finish. Remember folks, this is "science fiction"...it's not a documentary, it's "science fiction". Clint Mansell's soundtrack is one of the most amazing pieces of music ever composed.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  63. ArlisS.
    Sep 30, 2008
    10
    Beautiful, so many things go through my mind when trying to understand it, that it teaches me along the way. I'd love to see more movies like this one, rather than the brainwashing bullshit we see everywhere else.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  64. LaurieE
    Jun 2, 2009
    10
    It isn't the destination, its the journey that is important. Similar to "Being Human" with Robin Williams; good way to broach difficult issues of life and death.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  65. RobS
    Aug 20, 2009
    10
    Hands down, the most astonishing science fiction film of the past decade. Awesome on every level, and a sleeper destined to become a future classic. In 20 years from now, it will appear in lists of the greatest science fiction films ever made, if not in lists of the greatest films. Just as Bladerunner and 2001: A Space Odyssey do these days, despite both being widely ridiculed when they were first released... Also features possibly the most beautiful soundtrack score ever, by Clint Mansell. Even those who didn't understand or like the film, pretty much acknowledge that the music is a rare masterpiece. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  66. UnImpressed
    Aug 29, 2009
    3
    I'm loving the fact that there are so many reviews on here claiming to understand this film and dogging those who didn't. Interestingly enough, I don't think I read two of those reviews that agreed on what the film was about, or very many that attempted to explain it at all. I understand that many of those people and others will say that is the beauty of the film, that it can mean so many things to so many different people. But when something 'can' mean so many things to so many people, then it ultimately means nothing, doesn't it? I'm an open minded individual and watched this film, first of all thinking it was going to be something else, but then to read how long it was and ask myself "It was ONLY 96 minutes long?" I don't know, I'm sure many people could have a hayday with my review, but when a film feels an hour longer than it actually is, and when it ultimately , in my humble opinion, means nothing, then it is not a masterpiece, but a garbled mess of something that can't be explained. But of course, I know I have a more analytical than creative mind, so take it for what you will. Expand
    • 1 of 3 users said yes
  67. JeffS.
    Nov 21, 2006
    10
    I know i felt differently than much of the audience but I was transfixed. The movie just washed emotion over me, and even though its narrative flaws and cheese factor were obvious... it still worked amazingly. A powerful experience I will not soon forget.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  68. JeffA.
    Nov 21, 2006
    10
    The BEST movie of 2006!!!
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  69. YasharZ.
    Nov 22, 2006
    10
    This is a truly strange film. Love it or hate it, it WILL consume you. In my eyes, a true masterpiece.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  70. DougR
    Nov 23, 2006
    10
    Those who weren't moved by this film must have never loved anyone at a level beyond middle school crush.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  71. NandoP.
    Nov 24, 2006
    9
    Masterpiece with one of the most beautiful and meaningful message of life in the foreground (although not many critics worry to understand) (or, as David Lynch said, "the movie is its own explanation"). A urgent contemporary manifesto of art for life with technical excelence. Applause.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  72. RileyWebster
    Nov 24, 2006
    10
    One of the single greatest movies I've ever seen. Absolutely breathtaking.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  73. PaulF.
    Nov 25, 2006
    10
    If you are at all philosophically and or spiritually minded it is a good chance you will love this movie. This is not the type of movie for those who relish “Mission Impossible Three”. The fountain is slow paced, thought provoking, as well as intensely and soberly acted. The theme of the movie is over all about acceptance as is about the spiritual comfort of intimately being aware of the cycle of atrophy and creation. In my honest opinion this movie was incredible, but be warned, not all will see it this way. Yes, there are spiritually clichéd moments like Zen sitting poses and pans into the third eye, but this can easily be over looked because of the impeccable acting and the much needed message which was enlightening and healthy. I would heartily recommend this movie for any person seeking more to life than just seeking to fulfill the pleasure principle. Go see it. Even if you don't like it, which I sincerely hope you will, the experience of watching the Fountain will likely plant a seed that will metaphorically, like in the movie, spring into something new and wonderful. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  74. Vcoheda
    Nov 25, 2006
    10
    The Fountain by Darren Aronofsky is a very interesting film, dealing with the great themes (and dichotomies) of life & death, science & religion, temporality & eternity, and especially of love and how it intersects through all of these. It is also a movie which pushes the narrative technique to its farthest boundaries. At first, the movie seems strange and bizarre, incomprehensible (at times), yet it is always visually hypnotic and stimulating. However, once you figure out that the three stories of past, present, and future actually all take place in the present -- that is, that they are all just different perspectives of one man (Jackman the scientist), and that the story in indeed very linear -- the movie starts to come together and make sense. I would agree that some of the dialogue is poorly written, especially between the two leads, but the movie as a whole is undeniably rich, extremely ambitious (blending the conscious and unconscious, reality and fiction) and most importantly, original. Highly Recommended! Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  75. JayP.
    Nov 25, 2006
    10
    Visually stunning, and emotionally moving. That being said, it's not a movie for everyone. I adored it, but it does present the problem of the current level of intelect in this day and age.... it's going to go over most people's heads.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  76. TyeN.
    Nov 26, 2006
    6
    Okay....I'm giving this film a six out of ten. Here's why: It drove me mad! It's the first film I've ever seen where nearly everyone in the theater booed when the credits started rolling. I heard someone shout, "I want my money back!", and others yelling about how "This movie is horrible!" Here are my problems with it. First of all, the cinematography is moody, and I get that, but it's almost too dark that it becomes depresssing. The movie makes you work harder than any other film only to reach your own conclusion without any real sense of closure on it's own merits. This is maddening. But the most maddening aspect? The overall theme. What is it? Is it a morality tale about whether you should live forever if given the opportunity? Is it about love and it's endless bounds between two soul mates? Is it about the cycle of life and death? All of these themes pop up, but none are clearly designated to the plot. Speaking of which, here it is (without any real spoilers): Tommy Creo (Hugh Jackman) is a scientist who is working on a cure for a cancerous tumor that is killing his wife Izzi (Rachel Weisz). This is the central plotline. The second is the story of a conquistador named Tomas (again, Hugh Jackman) searching for the tree of life to save Spain and his queen Isabel (Rachel Weisz again). This story is actually a book that current day Izzi is writing, but can't seem to find an ending for. Finally, the third storyline is set in the future and is given no explanation at all. All you know is that Tommy (still Hugh Jackman) is floating through space in a clear bubble with nothing but a tree. He keeps having flash backs of Izzi and the book she was writing. Now that all of that is out of the way, let's get to what's good. I like that Darren Aronofsky is trying to do something different and epic. This is a romance that spreads across time and beyond. However, the execution just isn't as good as it could have been (or tries to be). The real high point is the acting. Weisz is beautiful and effective as Izzi, but her character just doesn't have the time to become three dimensional. She makes her affectionate and still worth caring about. But the real star and the film's highest point is Hugh Jackman. This is definitely his finest performance. He brings menacing anger to Tomas, and subtle beauty in the futuristic scenes. But the central plotline is where he shines. Tommy is a complex man that is so in love with his wife that he is willing to do the seemingly impossible. After 'The Prestige', Hugh Jackman deserves to be nominated for Best Actor for this film. He gives stand-out performances in both, but he owns the screen in 'The Fountain'. The other big stand-out is Ellen Burstyn. Her screen time is fairly short, but she is fierce as Dr. Lillian Guzetti, the head of the project that Tommy is desperately leading. I think that she is more Oscar worthy for Supporting Actress than Weisz is. I think that the film is worth seeing for sure, but it is not the masterpiece that Aronofsky so stubbornly believes it is. But if he keeps trying, I think he may eventually make that masterpiece. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  77. JeffC
    Nov 26, 2006
    10
    One of the most beautiful movies I've seen in a while. Even if someone has trouble following the narrative, I can't see how you could fault the score, art design, or cinematography of the film. That alone is worth seeing. This movie met my expectations on every level, and is highly recommended to anyone looking for a challenging film that raises questions about large themes in life. Its a unique movie experience. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  78. CamiloC
    Nov 27, 2006
    10
    I believe this film will be considered in terms of, for example, the Sistine Chapel or Handel's Messiah as one of the great achievements of human creativity. Magnificent.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  79. ZachR
    Nov 27, 2006
    10
    Anyone who thinks this is some watered down love story involving two people who live for thousands of years is missing alot. Alot of the reviews I have read seem to miss the central theme of this movie which is esentially coming to terms with things you cannot control and letting go of that which you cannot. Rather than being like the usual Hollywood drivel that trys to spoon feed themes to you, The Fountain lets you try to interpret the beautiful imagery for yourself. The three plotlines are arbitrary, not directly connected as too many people seem to think, and serve to tie the themes together. All of this is complimented by incredible special effects and a haunting score (Aronofsky brings back Clint Mansell and the Kronos Quartet along with Post-Rockers Mogwai) which leave this movie etched in your mind long after you've left the theatre. This movie reminds me of Tarkovsky's "Solyaris" on many levels and I'm interested to see how that would be reviewed if it were released today (oh wait, it was remade with George Clooney and was met with mixed reviews similar to this movie, though the original is far superior). Do not let the jaded, short-sighted, Zombified critics dissuade you from viewing this movie, it is brilliant. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  80. AlanR.
    Nov 28, 2006
    10
    This movie was fantastic. I was happy that for once a company didn't spoon feed me the same crap that they've tried to give us for years. I've always respected Aronofsky because he never holds your hand through a film he lets you draw your own conclusion. If someone is confused by details of this movie it's only because for the first time in years a character in a movie didn't tell us what's going on. I'm sick of this happening in films, it's like the movie industry believes the audience doesn't have enough intelligence to draw their own conclusions. It's a beautiful film, and it's definitely worth seeing. I will and have recommended it to everyone. I think it's the best movie that I've seen come out this year. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  81. jamesm.
    Nov 30, 2006
    9
    It was a bit confusing at the beginning, but everything fell into place eventually. in my opinion is not about a man in 3 seperate lives, as most people say. but instead 1 man's life from 3 different perspectives. very interesting. a must see
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  82. DavidH.
    Dec 11, 2006
    9
    I honestly can't figure out why this one is getting such a panning from the critics. I think many of them are defensively rating this low as to not be accused of being pretentious. The film is fantastic though, and not nearly as confusing as people are making it out to be. I went in with my attention cranked up to ten, expecting something along the lines of 2001: SO, but honestly this movie is actually slightly guilty of spoon-feeding the viewers it's symbolism, and shouldn't be confusing to anyone with the least bit of an attention span. The ending could have been edited slightly tighter, though, maybe ending five minutes earlier or so. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  83. BarryR.
    Dec 2, 2006
    6
    “The Fountain” is an interesting, challenging and, regretfully, an unsuccessful attempt by Darren Aronofsky to direct and co-write a science fiction film. Starring Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weiss (with Ellen Burstyn) this team of fine actors appears trapped in an unorthodox and surrealistic endeavor that suffers from a weak and disorganized plot and script with flashbacks, flashforwards and a muddled present. Although Salvator Dali fans may find great satisfaction in viewing this type of visual fantasy, most viewers probably will not. I was truly disappointed by the film and still cannot figure out what was in the minds of those who elected to finance, distribute and appear in it. The film gets a 6 with a suggestion that, if you can avoid going to see it, you should. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  84. ArtiP.
    Dec 2, 2006
    10
    Rarely does a film come by that is a true work of art. That is because of the multi-dimensionality of the system. In my observation, art is best exhibited in a uni-dimensional medium, because it lets the observer imagine the other dimensions. Like admiring a beautiful painting (visual), or listening to Beethoven(sound), or reading great literature - these art-forms offer great depth in one of the dimensions and let you imagine the rest. When a director is creating a movie, especially a feature film the coming together of the various mediums imposes the need to create a solid structure. In the process he tends to lose the raw emotions that art inspires. "The Fountain" is a great exceptation - as Darren Aronofsky has somehow magically retained the art in the movie. It does different things for different people, evokes different emotions, and does not end with your exit from the movie hall. My heart loved the movie (i watched it 4 days ago), and my mind is still processing it. Kudos to the Jackman, Aronofsky and Clint Mansell for bringing this masterpiece to life. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  85. JamieK.
    Dec 2, 2006
    10
    I'm first of all so glad that I just went to see this movie instead of trusting the low score on Metacritic and the bad reviews. I don't think that I will ever trust any reviewers ever again for that matter. This is a beautiful movie and made me feel something deep while waching it. The relationship of the two main characters was very genuine and I was glad to see that for a change. This movie is very artistic and emotional without being pretentious, and I felt very satisfied after seing it. Do see this movie; Aronofsky deserves the support for all the work he put into this one. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  86. AustinD.
    Dec 29, 2006
    10
    This is best film ever I seen. I can't hold my tears.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  87. BettyE.
    Dec 3, 2006
    10
    A masterpiece. Ambitious, thought-provoking, and meaningful, it drives you to question your own justifications for existence. With phenomenal direction by Aronofsky, fantastic and realistic performances all-around, and a heartfelt story, The Fountain is a film that demands repeat viewings to truly absorb the director's vision. See it with an open mind and savor its sublimity.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  88. TiC.
    Dec 5, 2006
    10
    One of the most beautiful films I have ever seen.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  89. NicholasB.
    Dec 8, 2006
    10
    By far my favourite movie of the year. No matter who I see this movie with, everyone has a different interpretation of what is happening in the film. Whether its all, half, or no truth, it doesn't matter. Not only is the movie visually stunning, it really is a romance movie hidden in a sci-fi epic. Just beautiful.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  90. LPC.
    Dec 8, 2006
    10
    One of the most stirring pieces of drama I've seen in years, on screen, on stage, or on tv. Jeweled elegance. I can't get over the passion with which some people disliked it. Did we see the same film? No matter. I consider it an early holiday gift.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  91. ChadS.
    Dec 8, 2006
    10
    "The Fountain" is, hands down, the best science-fiction film since David Cronenberg's "Existenz". The ascencion of that crystal ball, and the world inside it, is truly astonishing. The special effects in "The Fountain" has a quality that differs from most films. They're emotional. They're also used as metaphor. "The Fountain" is not completely unlike "Fantastic Voyage". Tommy's journey that seemingly is going beyond earth's sphere, in actuality, is a journey of an internal sort. It's a trek through his inner space(I think). "The Fountain" is not for everybody. A facetious description of this visionary film is that it's "Solaris" on crack. But if you're into eastern religions, have the dexterity to process three narrative threads, and might possibly be a little in love with Rachel Weisz(this time, when I close my eyes, I don't hear Kate Winslet), "The Fountain" might be the best film you see this year. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  92. ZephyrJ.
    Jan 26, 2007
    10
    The Fountain is not meant for casual viewing. It takes a stream-of-consciousness approach, and it was not until my third viewing that I was able to completely figure it out. I can not speak for anyone else, but I am sure of my own opinion, and this is one of the finest movies I have ever seen.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  93. JoeC.
    Feb 18, 2007
    9
    I loved this film. As I walked out of the theatre, all I could think about was seeing it again. Does that make it good? Not necessarily. But it changed the way I view cinema. And that is just fine with me.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  94. MariR.
    Feb 19, 2007
    10
    A movie ahead its time! Future will show!
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  95. EricC.
    May 16, 2007
    9
    The bad reviews are suprising, since critics were suckers for Aranofsky's first two films, also complex and surreal. Shockingly beautiful, and yeah, occasionally confusing as all hell, but doesn't deserve the brutal reviews. How can you praise someone for doing something twice before, and then try to punish him when he does it again with even more grace and skill? Mark F is right. It doesn't topple 2001 as the deffinitive mind-bending sci-fi epic. But if you give it a chance, it'll come pretty close. Just don't overthink it. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  96. AndersL.
    May 21, 2007
    10
    A minor masterpiece. Bears repeated viewings. The soundtrack is also gorgeous.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  97. JoeAverage
    May 26, 2007
    8
    It's too bad Aronofsky deals in pretty images (thematic and visual), rather than develop his arguments (yes Darren, I have questions on Immortality, Life and True Love as well, but what's your take?) At least in Pi, he attempted to tackle his subject matter straight on. It's all a lovely trip to soak in though. Although, all the lotus position stuff does look rather stupid and out-of-place. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  98. AnonymousH
    May 29, 2007
    8
    Jimmy stop giving 10's to movies just because they are original. If you really like a movie give it a 9, especially if you admit there is argument for flaws. It's people like you that rate movies 10's or 0's that give objective criticism a bad name. The movie is good and original. Not perfect. Check it out.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  99. MatthewF.
    Jun 17, 2007
    7
    While it seems like a rather illogical, incoherent, and too smart to grasp film, Darren Aronofsky’s latest film isn’t any of them. It’s simply, a classical love fantasy spun across three narratives. What complicates things are the messiness of the whole thing, and Aronofskys disregard for weaving them together in any kind of normal fashion. He uses these three narratives, about a scientist, a conquistador, and an astronaut, all named Tom to essentially featuring the same character to create one bold statement, predominantly about life and death. If you connect the vast amounts of symbolism, perhaps you’ll find more of a connection between these three. In any case, all three of these characters are searching to prevent death, rather than face life. Aronofsky backs all this up with an immensely beautiful use of the screen. Luckily he has not adopted his earlier frantic and fast style, because it would be rather distracting here. Instead, he gives depth to the frame, uses his three different settings to his advantage, and most importantly, experiments. Credit is due to his continual cinematographer Matthew Libatique, one of the unseen arsenals in Aronofsky’s bag, along with composer Clint Mansell. The influences are quite clear, whether it’s Herzog’s Aguirre, The Wrath of God, Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, or strangely enough, Bowie’s Space Oddity. The Fountain does transcend away from its influences to find its own, but the problem is, since it doesn’t seem to completely know itself, it becomes rather distracting to us. But then again, this is one of the few cases in which we don’t need to know every last detail, because there’s too much going on already. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  100. ChrisP.
    Dec 28, 2008
    9
    This film has really hooked me, despite its flaws. Tommy and, especially, Izzy are too broadly drawn as characters: in the DVD commentary, Aronofsky admits he wanted them to be archetypes, so their love story lacks the little details and specificities that might have made it really emotionally vivid and put the film over the top for those critics who hated it for the complicated and ambiguous trio of timelines. Really the movie isn't about Tommy and Izzy, but about Tommy and his own denial of death; Izzy's mortality is just a vehicle for Tom to confront his own. So it's another movie in which the female lead is basically a masculine projection, and that maybe is its real flaw. But Tommy's journey through grief to ... well, you'll see ... is still moving for me. And, yes, it might be because of the soundtrack, which works for this film as no soundtrack ever has before, tying together the three separate timelines into one emotional arc. It's also visually gorgeous; during production the planned use of computer graphics had to be scrapped for macrophotography for budgetary reasons, and thank god, because the results are beautiful and unlike anything else I've seen on film. Overall, even though I could't put the pieces together logically as I was watching it, I found that there was an emotional logic to the film that was deeply satisfying. Although I like to analyze the heck out of films, this is one that really does work well if you just let it wash over you. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 36 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 36
  2. Negative: 7 out of 36
  1. It's possible to admire or respect a movie without enjoying it too much, and that's partly the reaction I had to Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain. It's an incredibly ambitious film of sometimes thrilling visual achievement, but it didn't connect fully to my mind and nerves.
  2. Bloated and logy, and art-directed within an inch of its life, the movie shovels heaps of phony portent and all-purpose mystical imagery onto a thin and maudlin plot.
  3. 50
    The problem, though, is that its techniques run too far beyond its ideas, which are blurry and banal, rather than mysterious and resonant. The Fountain is something to see, but it is also much less, finally, than meets the eye.