- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 15, 2006
User Score
5.5
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 30 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 30
-
Mixed: 2 out of 30
-
Negative: 10 out of 30
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
DanC.Jun 9, 20075This film wants desperately to be "The Third Man" but it just isn't. It never manages to create the right mood. It feels staged and non-authentic throughout. The actors are not up to the material or setting. Tobey Maguire and George Clooney are both surprisingly weak, and I say that as a big fan of Maguire. A big disappointment.
-
-
JoeAverageApr 5, 200711 out of 10 for taking notes while the film crew watched The Third Man during pre-production (although they forgot to take down notes on characterization, plot and conveying emotion) Seriously, do yourself a favor and rent the far, far superior The Third Man, and don't bother with this painfully anal homage.
-
-
MarkM.Feb 6, 20086I thought the entire cast was very good, especially Cate Blanchett. The problem was there were too many loose ends. I recommend this movie to anyone who appreciates excellent acting but don't expect too much from it.
-
-
DaveA.Dec 18, 20068
-
-
RobertoS.Mar 25, 20079Excellent movie. Not only technically refined, but also very complex intellectually and emotionally.
-
-
MJMay 25, 20079If you are fan of old B&W movies...it is a really wonderful film. I thoroughly enjoyed it and think that the critics failed to see what an interesting work it was.
-
-
WilliamsG.May 27, 20071A huge disappointment. It was in no way similar to the very good book -- a very poorly done movie -- convoluted and impossible to follow -- the characters shallow. A complete waste of time!
-
-
WilfO.Aug 3, 20091After reading the novel the film was nothing but a complete disappointment.
-
-
GeorgeB.Dec 15, 20063Lots of promise in this one: great cast, terrific director. But no rewards for this viewer - the script is terrible, tediously dragging everything along with it.
-
-
MozzM.Dec 7, 20068I caught this because a friend was invited to a preview, and I loved it--LOVED it! It's hypnotic, and I thought Cate Blanchett was amazing. The story gets slow towards the middle, but I thought that was the perfect time to study the film. As a film noir it's flawless, and it's just about the most beautifully shot film you'll ever see.
-
-
KlausRDec 1, 200710
-
-
MarkMDec 31, 20072
-
-
AndersJ.Mar 29, 20071One of the most unbearably pretentious movies I have ever seen. Go rent the Third Man but don't see this movie, It's a complete hack job. Tobey Maguire is completely miscast and its painful to watch.
-
-
TonyB.Aug 29, 20076"The Good German" is among the more underrated films of 2006.
-
-
R.L.Jan 14, 200910The Good German is one of the best returns to the 1940s style of film-noir. It has the right mix of action, adventure, mystery, Intrigue & romance. The Good German hypnotizes you with it's blend of murder & mystery, action & Intrigue, Romance & lies. You'll never stop guessing who's behind what, and most importantly who you can trust.
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
58The Good German is a prime example of a movie made by highly skilled and intelligent filmmakers that nevertheless seems misguided from the get-go.
-
40In his genre pastiche The Good German, Steven Soderbergh has tried to resurrect the magic of classical Hollywood, principally by sucking out all the air, energy and pleasure from his own filmmaking.
-
83With a few self-conscious exceptions, Soderbergh makes an earnest attempt to return to that place and time in both history and American filmmaking, and his risk-taking pays fascinating dividends.