- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Aug 12, 2005
User Score
8.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 49 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 41 out of 49
-
Mixed: 1 out of 49
-
Negative: 7 out of 49
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
NeilB.Aug 6, 20058
-
-
EricSJan 7, 200610
-
-
JaneOct 9, 200510Awesome!
-
-
SteveC.Apr 23, 20069
-
-
DavidZApr 1, 20079This is one of the examples that most movie critics got it wrong. Their comments and evaluations became formulaic and predictable.
-
-
JerryM.Aug 14, 200510The critics that have panned this movie obviously have no sense of patriotism and nobility. Their prejudice blinds them to the excellent screenplay and design. This movie is a classic. Go see it! The critics are full of feces.
-
-
JerryAug 19, 20059With the exception of a distracting love interest thread, this movie had a well developed plot. Being a true story made it that much more surreal. The enemy was portayed historically accarate, whicj makes a chilling staement of war. I recoomend this movie to all who want to understand some of the reasons why as Lee once said, it is good war is so terrible,...
-
-
gibAug 20, 20053
-
-
NicholasF.Aug 8, 20058I thought it was pretty well done. Most likely it will be overlooked due to the lack of knowledge about WWII in the Pacific.
-
-
DanielC.Aug 9, 20053It's boring, tedious, and unengaging. It's a shame that with a setting rife with emotions and real stories, the director and first-time screenwriters couldn't create any character to care about.
-
-
AlvinSep 13, 200510Tremedous movie. Loved it. Ensemble cast was terrific. Definitely worth the watch. The professional critics give War of The Worlds a 74 and this movie a 48? If you ever wanted a proof that these critics are bought and paid for all you need do is have the public watch both movies. One is awful and this one is great. Don't miss it.
-
-
IanD.Jan 14, 20061I give it a one because it's a true story. Otherwise, the pacing was slow, the story was scattered and James Franco's acting can be compared to a stone wall, lifeless. No wonder this sat on the shelf for two years...if it was any good, they would've released it back in 2002. Think about that...
-
-
SpriggangirlOct 20, 20072I only watched the movie just to see Jackson! That was about it... Nothing else.
-
-
DeeJ.Aug 10, 20059I loved this film and think it's the best one of the year.
-
-
MikeB.Aug 13, 200510
-
-
TrinimanAug 14, 20056
-
-
SubanD.Aug 16, 20058It's a very beautiful film, visually and dramatically. Sometimes I wonder if critics would write better things about films if they got to see them for free.
-
-
MarkB.Aug 18, 20058
-
-
JohnF.Aug 18, 200510Great movie.
-
-
RockyAug 18, 200510Simply outstanding. It has you from the opening minute sitting on the edge of your seat. Where have movies like this been? Do not miss it.
-
-
CarolAnnC.Aug 22, 200510This is a "real " movie in the sense that it not riddled with special effects and superfulous dialog.You really cared about the characters. A trully courageous group of men and women. I am telling everyone to go to this wonderful experience called "the Great Raid"
-
-
anna.Aug 24, 200510I loved this film. It made me proud of the military leadership which is something I seldom feel these days. We have so much to learn from history and this film shows courage, comittment, and dedication to our soldiers. I would hope that all our current military leadership would view this multiple times. Thank you Weinstein brothers.
-
-
TreP.Aug 26, 20059Worthwhile and necessary in this era of over-to-top Hollywood everything. I highly recommend it.
-
-
TomasAug 27, 200510Gib you are dead wrong in your critique of this film. It is one of the better films to be turned out in many years. If you fail to see this you will be missing out on a fantastic story presented in a straight forward manor with all the warts and fleas. Just a fantastic job in bringing this true story to the silver screen. Don't miss it.
-
-
LeslieAug 28, 200510Simply fantastic. A movie that is richly rewarding and should not be missed. I am amazed that Hollywood did not manage to screw this one up as they usually do? One of the best movies of the year.
-
-
DetroitSep 15, 200510Thank you Hollywood for a great movie.
-
-
JaredB.Jan 26, 200710The fact that some critics gave this movie such harsh reviews lets me know that some people just don't know a great movie when they see it. Sure, it could have been at least 10 minutes shorter. However, despite the length, this is a stunning, action-packed retelling of the most successful rescue operation ever attempted by a U.S. military outfit. An excellent film.
-
-
JerkGuySep 24, 20078
-
-
AnitaH.Oct 21, 200510I was so excited to see this movie since my Dad was one of the Rangers that went on the raid. I was glad the movie stuck to the facts. Can't wait to get the CD so I can play the end frame by frame and maybe see my Dad.
-
-
ManuelR.Dec 16, 20058Should have had more action. I read the book and it was good.
-
-
MaddyDec 21, 20057Another impeccable example of how utterly useless American critics are. Yet they'll eat up garbage like King Kong.
-
-
MarkS.Aug 13, 20052No one is arguing the importance of this historical story, however, the movie sucked. The screenplay was so horribly written, and the movie lacked any immersion that is necessary for a time-period film. What this story really needed was a Spielberg, Stone or Howard to give it what it deserved - a well portrayed, engrossing film of this great historic moment.
-
-
[Anonymous]Aug 16, 200510
-
-
RajivAug 16, 200510
-
-
VictorSep 18, 200510Fantastic.
-
-
May 30, 20115
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
50The film brings a spectacular but little-known chapter of World War II to the big screen with meticulous attention to period detail -- and almost none to compelling narrative.
-
40This overlong march will bore all but the most nobly patriotic.
-
40The Great Raid is ultimately scotched by History Channel–worthy nostalgia.