- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Dec 5, 1990
User Score
7.7
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 9 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 8 out of 9
-
Mixed: 1 out of 9
-
Negative: 0 out of 9
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
GaborA.Jun 28, 20046There are a lot of movies about con artists. More importantly, there are a lot of movies about con artists better than this one.
-
-
EloiP.Nov 30, 200210Annette Bening was amazing in this. And the ending is a doozy... a must see!
-
-
PatC.Jan 7, 20048The problem with being amoral is that one cannot refer to an amoral compass. They are perenially off course & trying to cover their tracks. And if that sounds vague, you can bet this film will explain it. It's about unpleasant people, but there is pleasure in watching them interact from a safe distance (do not touch the glass. do not approach the glass).
-
-
YoonMinC.Sep 28, 20036Well written but mechanical exercise in noirishness. Annette Bening is irritating as usual , Cusack's role is unconvincing and flabby. Only Huston sizzles but not enough to cook this dead fish of a movie.
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
100The performances are all insidiously powerful.
-
100The movie is pulp, yet it attains a surprising emotional power-especially when Anjelica Huston's Lilly, a survivor who'll do whatever it takes to master her surroundings, is on-screen.
-
[Frears] has not only captured the bleak qualities of the old film noir melodramas but supplied an undercurrent that is as sly as it is unsettling. [25 Jan 1991]