The Last Exorcism Part II
User Score
2.9 out of 10

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 19 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 19
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 19
  3. Negative: 12 out of 19

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. DanteTheCynic
    Mar 2, 2013
    0
    This movie had no reason to be made. It really should've been straight to DVD, if not scrapped completely. If you want a better movie in the Exorcism genre, go watch The Exorcist.
  2. Thegodfatherson
    Mar 1, 2013
    0
    Stupid. Horrific. And Stupid. The Last Exorcism Part 2 was just really fashionable. Or you think so? Tis film has Ashley Bell with a broken stupid role and the film has no compelling with the original. NOT EVEN A SINGLE COMPELLING. It has a broken horror story and bad dialogues with the special effects used at the wrong time. Fans of the original might put up with it but IAM definitely sure this film will disappoint horror film lovers.… Expand
  3. RalphsReviews
    Apr 29, 2013
    1
    There is absolutely no reason to see this movie. It was clearly made just for money. Since the movie barely put any effort in entertaining the audience, I will barely put any effort into writing this review. Some say this movie should've gone straight to DVD. No. This movie should've gone straight up the directors ass so no one will ever be able to see this abomination.
  4. Nesbitt10
    Mar 10, 2013
    1
    "The Last Exorcism: Part II" gives the devil plenty of space and time to show off his handiwork, but apart from making young women contort their bodies--that's about all he does. The film is short on genuine scares and any ingenuity. So many sequences are structured, that the pattern becomes predictable and tiresome. Especially since the first film at least set a standard for originality--this sequel--which reshapes it's creative team, delivers nothing … Expand
  5. HaithamBayazeed
    Mar 30, 2013
    6
    Everything in this movie we saw in vary of other horror movies, it was kind of entertaining though, with a great performance coming from Ashley Bell, Although it is not a necessary sequel, but highly recommended if you have like nothing to do and you are board to death! Go watch it.
  6. soren40
    Mar 3, 2013
    3
    After seeing the first movie I thought this would be okay but I was wrong. If it wasn't for Ashley Bell I wouldn't have seen this movie at all. The ending was different but still not good. The original was a much better movie then this. There was nothing that stood out about this movie and the special effects were mediocre at best. Not a good movie at all.
  7. mds03
    Mar 3, 2013
    6
    It was kind of disappointing because the first one was so good. The biggest problem was that it answers no questions or completely resolves the ending of the first one. It wasn't all the scary either. It was pretty entertaining though. Despite the stupid last minute of it.

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
36 out of 100

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 16 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 16
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 16
  3. Negative: 7 out of 16
  1. Boston Globe
    Reviewed by: Ethan Gilsdorf
    Mar 7, 2013
    50
    Once the “what is real, what is fantasy” questions are answered, and exorcism part deux commences, The Last Exorcism Part II abandons its half-intelligent, tender exploration of Nell’s vulnerability and desirability
    Read full review
  2. Village Voice
    Reviewed by: Simon Abrams
    Mar 6, 2013
    30
    When the creators of The Last Exorcism Part II swapped pseudo-verité realism for psychological realism, they made it a lot harder to take their franchise seriously.
    Read full review
  3. Austin Chronicle
    Reviewed by: Marjorie Baumgarten
    Mar 6, 2013
    20
    The film, however, is short on genuine scares and ingenuity.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »