User Score
5.6 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 29 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 17 out of 29
  2. Negative: 8 out of 29

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Rekha
    Sep 4, 2008
    0
    Horrible acting. Laughable costumes. Pathetic dialogue. Lame direction. This is an insult to actors and filmmakers.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  2. DustyS.
    Aug 16, 2007
    1
    One of the worst movies I have ever seen! From the low production quality to the weak story and overdone character stereotypes, this movie could hardly be more disappointing.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  3. GeneW.
    Aug 22, 2007
    0
    The worst movie of the year. Worst movie of last year. Probably the worst movie of next year. Badly edited, it makes almost no sense and wastes a good cast. Terrible doesn't quite capture how awful this movie truly is.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  4. Peggy
    Jan 27, 2008
    9
    Entertaining movie,appealing characters--I liked it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. Gavin
    Sep 1, 2007
    8
    Much better than I expected.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. AdamG.
    Sep 29, 2007
    7
    Good historical entertainment. I'd read the book first. Aishwarya Rai is incredibly hot too.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. DanielS.
    Dec 30, 2007
    8
    I enjoy B movies. This is a good B movie. Ben Kingsley does especially well. However, if you can only tolerate A list fare, stay away.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. MicheleM.
    Aug 24, 2007
    8
    I thought it harkened back to the bygone days of film making-I really enjoyed it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. PaulJ.
    Feb 25, 2008
    7
    This is really a good TV movie, however it does have lots of action and although looks on the cheap side i really enjoyed it. Great DVD for the lads.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. TonyM
    Mar 16, 2008
    6
    An Ok dramatised historical movie however it's filled with cheap CGI and a bad script. Read the book first, it's so much better than the movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. JamesE.
    Aug 7, 2008
    10
    An enjoyable film with the fall of Rome. Great movie with an intriguing plot. Bob B should be raped by a retard with AIDS.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. JaredC.
    Aug 14, 2007
    10
    Amazing, this Colin Firth is starring in a movie King Arthur should have been.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. layas.
    Aug 18, 2007
    10
    very good
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. StanB.
    Aug 21, 2007
    7
    Decent movie, better than I anticipated.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. [Anonymous]
    Aug 23, 2007
    0
    totally boring
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. Nov 20, 2010
    4
    Not very good. It's a poor mans Lord of the Rings. Skip it. The actors overact and it is historically inaccurate. The costumes are OK though. The script was boring and it just dragged on and on.
  17. May 12, 2012
    3
    Those who've read the book of Valerio Massimo Manfredi will probably agree that the movie had too many differences compared to the novel. The movie felt like if its balances were misplaced. Too many changes, too many lame dialogues, very bad combat scenes. And inexistent characters. Those were present also in the book, but the movie lost even the best element of the literary original: all the valuable information about the Roman era... Disappointing. Expand
Metascore

Generally unfavorable - based on 12 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 12
  2. Negative: 2 out of 12
  1. Distinctly humdrum, The Last Legion, a boy's adventure story that seems to have been dragged out of the vaults of some early-sixties TV series.
  2. Reviewed by: Ken Fox
    63
    While not exactly in the same league as the visually dazzling "Excalibur" and saddled with cheap looking CGI effects, this Anglo-Italian co-production has quite a bit of fun finding a direct path from the fall of Rome to the birth of Arthurian legend.
  3. Reviewed by: Joe Leydon
    40
    Seriously hampered by glaring inconsistencies of tone and intent, and often feels like a series of highlights carved out of a much longer epic.