- Studio: Peace Arch Entertainment Group
- Release Date: Apr 10, 2009
User Score
4.6
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 9 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 4 out of 9
-
Mixed: 1 out of 9
-
Negative: 4 out of 9
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Dec 23, 20106For the purpose of condensing the novel, I can understand why some of the choices are made. However, removing Arthur and consolidating him with Cleveland was questionable. Having read the book, it made me fairly uncomfortable, but somehow the ending came to practically the same conclusion minus perhaps a bit of emotion.
-
LeviKJan 18, 20101
-
-
SeanFAug 9, 20097
-
-
JayH.Aug 2, 20095Nicely acted, but the movie is just fair. It's well enough done, it has a polished and professional look to it. The story just didn't always hold my interest. Nice cinematography.
-
-
DwayneBApr 10, 20092Missed the tone of the novel completely, distorting characters relationships, motivations and even sexual orientations. Did Thurber even read the novel? Or just the dust jacket? A hatchet job.
-
-
60Disappointed fans of Michael Chabon will have to watch "Wonder Boys" for solace, for The Mysteries of Pittsburgh boasts only one core mystery: how one can take such promising material and render it completely unmemorable?
-
In the film's most flamboyant role, Peter Sarsgaard's devil-ish charisma and cold bluster is frightening.
-
70The full warmth and idiosyncrasy of Chabon's original is missed in an adaptation that feels more impersonally observed. But Lawson's pic, (with the director making a left turn from prior feature "Dodgeball," which he says was a money gig undertaken to hasten this dream project) is entertaining and involving enough on its own terms.