- Studio: Gramercy Pictures (I)
- Release Date: Dec 24, 1996
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
88[A] bold and brilliant rendering of Henry James' masterpiece.
-
75I think if you care for James, you must see it. It is not an adaptation but an interpretation.
-
75A fascinating portrait not only of a lady, but of the society and marriage that entrap, then attempt to destroy, her.
-
75A splendid adaptation that will be hard for the others to match. The Portrait of a Lady, directed by Jane Campion, brings intelligence and sensitivity to a story rich in psychological subtlety and sociological detail.
-
70The Portrait of a Lady may not be up to this high standard, but it is never less than absorbing either.
-
70Brilliantly eccentric even when it yields mixed results.
-
70A literary adaptation of exceeding intelligence, beauty and concentrated artistry, but one that remains emotionally remote and perhaps unavoidably problematic dramatically.
-
70With this bold stamp [director Jane Campion] lays claim to the story that follows as wholly her own.
-
67In aiming for a new kind of lit-drama cool, Jane Campion freezes the warmth right out of Henry James' expansive heart.
-
63Intelligent but exasperating, its monotonous tone will wear down even viewers who started out in its corner. [27 Dec 1996]
-
63Jane Campion makes a beeline for the repressed sexuality, and loses the nuance. [17 Jan 1997]
-
60Ms. Campion has shown a gift for pictorialism -- static pictorialism; she's not a fluid filmmaker - and an abiding fascination with sexual repression. She brings both to this long, slow, distanced version of the Henry James novel. [27 Dec 1996]
-
50The Portrait of a Lady is a huge disappointment. It's a deliberately arty, overly formal exercise in emotional terrorism.
-
50A harmeless concoction.
-
This picture is oddly un-charged, indistinct and even long-winded.
-
40Remote, murky and interminable.
-
30[An] unsatisfying mess.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
There are no user reviews yet.