- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: Dec 9, 2011
User Score
5.2
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 70 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 32 out of 70
-
Mixed: 22 out of 70
-
Negative: 16 out of 70
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Mar 2, 20121
-
Oct 11, 20122Awful flick. Honestly...this is one of those movies where I can honestly say you'd have to pay me money to watch it again. Poorly acted. Jokes were stale. I think I might've chuckled once or twice. At least I didn't pay money to watch this.
-
Jun 30, 20123
-
Jan 24, 20124This movie was really bad because of the kid actors not Hill. They could not really act even though I have seen records before. If they kept the real life problems out it would have been better. It was not that nasty and could have been more raunchy.
-
Feb 8, 20123
-
Apr 15, 20123If I said to my friends that this movie sucked, they will give me hell about it. So I now without any of my friends knowing that I i'm gonna talk trash about this movie. This movie is so bad I could go back in time and kill the director[ JK] but its not very smart if you ask me. It fails to do that. The Sitter 3.4/10
-
Aug 18, 20120This film is definitely a plagiarism made of Adventures in Babysitting. Full of curses and bad jokes, which is but a poor attempt to imitate the great movie: Adventures in babysitting.
-
Nov 7, 20124Using foul-mouthed children for comedic effect is growing old on me quickly; however, Jonah Hill saves the film from being a complete disaster and generates virtually every laugh.
-
60The Sitter feels slapdash and quick, but you might not want to have it any other way.
-
40For a comedy, The Sitter is frightfully spare on full-bodied laughs.
-
Dec 13, 201120After "Pineapple Express" and "Your Highness," is Green now contractually obligated to revive every dead comedic subgenre of the '80s? What's next, a stoner-friendly "License to Drive"?