- Studio: Summit Entertainment
- Release Date: Oct 21, 2011
User Score
5.2
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 119 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 57 out of 119
-
Mixed: 25 out of 119
-
Negative: 37 out of 119
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Oct 29, 20113It's a movie you want to skip.The story is shallow and plain boring. They succeed in making the characters unique though, but none stands out, some are even ridiculous. Plot-changes are present, but never realy shock you. Avoid if possible, unless your dvd-player broke and you've seen all other movies in the cinema.
-
Oct 21, 20112
-
Oct 21, 20110This film stinks worse than the Three Musketeers bar I dropped in my toilet this morning! They should have titled it â
-
Oct 31, 20114
-
Oct 21, 20111Decepcionante pelicula, todo es demasiado rocambolesco y poco creible. Las actuaciones pobres asi como su guion en general. Una pelicula mala muy mala sin ningun tipo de arte. ESTO NO ES CINE
1/10 -
Oct 25, 20112This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
May 20, 20120This Movie was so bad, that now, while i'm trying to write a review for it, I cannot for the life of me, remember one single moment of the movie, it's plot or it's action sequences. Was it a comedy? was it an action movie? was there even drama? Fail....
-
Jun 1, 20123Oh dear how could they ruin the classic story like this... Airships with multi-cannons? seriously? this film could have been pretty decent but they filled it with too much frills and steam-punk nonsense that the story just evaporated to nothing. This is exactly how I'd expect a chav to view a classic book.
-
Nov 11, 20113What do you get when you get decent actors and an awful script, along with a mediocre director who doesn't even need to direct these kind of movies?
This flop. -
Oct 24, 20112
-
Oct 25, 20111A horrible plot that you have to watch half the movie before it even starts. The dialog is is close to awkward with short "trying to be cool" lines. The acting is from bad to average and you see way to little off the only good actor Mads Mikkelsen.
I sat trough the whole movie just begging for it to end.
DON'T waist your money to go see it! -
Oct 29, 20114Disappointment to fans of the original Musketeers movie. Not the least bit enthralling. Indubitably a TV movie. Lost meaning of 'One for all and all for one'.
-
Nov 3, 20111
-
Nov 11, 20110
-
Feb 18, 20122
-
Oct 8, 20120This film stinks. Typical Hollywood lack of imagination, lack of grasp on the wonderful English language, waste of talent and stupid, childish ideas and effects. I wouldn't wipe my bum with it.
-
May 21, 20121That's food to pig ! With a poor and totally unhistorical story, a bad actors game and a lot of dumb stuff like "balloons fighting in the sky" or failings special effects. Don't loose your time in watching it.
-
Sep 9, 20122This movie? Well, let's say there was only ONE scene I liked the most. The rest was bunch of stories, characters, plots, flying ships and sword fighting that really, REALLY gets you dizzy and makes you skip the movie to its crappy end. I really went with too much expectations for this movie, and that's an error I did. This movie truly sucks.
-
40Still, once you accept Paul W.S. Anderson's entirely unnecessary adaptation on its own terms (nonsensical, underachieving), it has its limited charms, which include a snigger-inducing alphabet soup of accents, a standout rooftop swordfight, and British comedian James Corden as the Musketeers' put-upon manservant.
-
Oct 26, 201150It floats, but it's mainly filled with hot air.
-
25This is a once-in-a-lifetime fiasco, an epic fail like none we have seen this year, a bad idea by a very bad director and a career-crippling credit for all concerned. You don't want to miss it.