SummaryIn a world of 6 billion people, it takes only one to change your life. In actor and filmmaker Tom McCarthy's follow-up to his award-winning directorial debut "The Station Agent," we get to know Walter Vale, a disillusioned Connecticut economics professor whose life is transformed by a chance encounter in New York City. Through newfound c...
SummaryIn a world of 6 billion people, it takes only one to change your life. In actor and filmmaker Tom McCarthy's follow-up to his award-winning directorial debut "The Station Agent," we get to know Walter Vale, a disillusioned Connecticut economics professor whose life is transformed by a chance encounter in New York City. Through newfound c...
As a writer-director, McCarthy, like the characters and the places that he suffuses with emotion, has poetry in him - and he knows how to let it out. He has a talent for demarcating those spaces in which characters can become whoever they want to be.
This is a film of our times - paranoid, heartbroken, disillusioned - and the rare recent American movie whose characters react the way actual people might.
Richard Jenkins gives the performance of a lifetime in this touching,subtle **** McCarthy's vision is unflinchingly humanistic as well as politically and culturally ****'s at times funny,always moving and incredibly absorbing.Highly recommended!
Easily one of my favorite films in recent years. I have recommended this film countless times and it was equally as good on the second viewing. The blossoming of the professor character, given a new set of influences in his life, was realistic and a captivating story. If only all films had such a brilliant personal portrait as the main theme. Issues of the tragic impacts of illegal immigration are played out effectively, but to me was a side story to that of our professor finding himself.
McCarthy's flawless casting may be the film's greatest strength: Veteran character actor Jenkins and his costars vanish into their characters -- their performances are so subtle and unforced that they don't feel like performances at all.
McCarthy unquestionably means well, but he's made one of those incredibly naïve movies that gives liberals a bad name, and which does more to regress the sociopolitical discourse than advance it.
An excellently structured, skillfully acted drama that effectively weaves sincere, relevant, and affecting thematic elements throughout its very unique story.
Ageing widowed professor, goes to New York conference, immigrants living in his flat, makes friends, learns how to drum, male immigrant gets caught, mother turns up.
Slow-paced but enjoyable film which I did think in parts was like Lost in Translation where not much happens but the characters build up.
Well acted, nice music & a film with it's heart is in the right place.
What would you do if you suddenly arrived at your apartment, that apartment that you only use from time to time, but that's yours anyway, and found a couple living in it? This is precisely what happens in this film to Walter, a peaceful university professor, who has lived a boring and routine life for decades, and sees his life change when he arrives at his New York apartment for a conference and meets two illegal immigrants living there, convinced that they had rented it. Who visits whom? It depends, I think, on the perspective.
The film is directed and written by Tom McCarthy, who could have done better if he was more direct in what he wants to say to his audience. The script is effective in telling a good story, but it should be more frontal in the way it tries to question the way we react to immigrants and the problem of immigration in post-9/11 America. The film does indeed want to question the justice of the authorities' treatment of these immigrants, but it does not want to openly criticize that subject, which is particularly relevant for us in Southern Europe, as we have immense newcomers swimming across the Mediterranean. On the other hand, he also does an interesting exercise in putting the peaceful life of a mature man inside out. Sometimes what we need is a shake-up to start enjoying life in another way, and to find new forms of happiness.
The cast is powerfully led by Richard Jenkins. The actor is good, and his work here is strong enough to withstand most of the film. Personally, I had no problems with the way the character changes and I don't see it strange that he is interested in the drum. Here, in Portugal, this kind of instrument became popular thanks to the Portuguese contact with Africa (as you certainly know, my country was present there for a long time) and I remember seeing schoolmates, white like me, with similar drums. The actor is good, but establishes an uninteresting relationship with Hiam Abbass. The actress does her job well, but she has little to do, and their chemistry was not convincing. I never realized if they come together out of guilt and fear or if there really is any affection. More convincing was the relationship between Haaz Sleiman and Danai Gurira, and Sleiman's joy and optimism is a welcome bonus, although it is hard to believe from the moment he is arrested. Shouldn't prison have a more devastating effect on the morale and optimism of someone like him?
Technically, it is a discreet film, betting more on the history and performance of the actors than on any scenic subterfuge. Cinematography is standard, the sets and costumes are what we would expect to find. The soundtrack has nothing really appealing about it, and New York City, which is particularly photogenic, was really underused.