Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
The Whole Ten Yards
User Score
3.4 out of 10

Generally unfavorable- based on 28 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 28
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 28
  3. Negative: 18 out of 28

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. AshleyJ.
    Apr 8, 2004
    8
    Loved it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. VinceH.
    Apr 11, 2004
    0
    See all the horrendous reviews this movie is getting?...there's a reason for it. Vapid, lifeless, boring, unfunny, and pointless. Essentially the film is 90 minutes of Matthew Perry falling down and slamming into walls and Bruce Willis being either mean or crying (doing the same sthick that De Niro did in "Analyze This"). Kevin Pollak was very funny though. WORST FILM OF 2004 for sure...but it's still early.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. RyanW.
    Apr 14, 2004
    10
    Whoa! I've never seen the critics be this wrong. Best movie of 2004...I nearly soiled myself!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. Bob
    Apr 16, 2004
    0
    Here is a case of going to the well once too often to milk the cow dry. Just awful. Don't waste your time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. DanM.
    Apr 9, 2004
    4
    A few good laughs. Elisa Gallay as "Anya" shined. Want to see more of her. The director and writer could have done much better.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. EfeB.
    Jul 30, 2004
    1
    My score is 1 and not a fat 0 simply because i felt sorry for bruce willis in this movie. i have a feeling he needed the money...so he got the money and my one vote. it would have been better if ALL he did was take, but he GAVE us something....something so magnificently stupid, so amazingly shamefull, so mind bendingly crappy....he gave us this movie. if i begin with bruce's review, there will be no space to write about how bad kevin pollack and matthew perry and amanda peet were in this film. so let's give bruce a break and put his performance in a few words: "aaaaaaaaaaarrrrgh"!!!!! o.k, as for kevin pollack the same word above doesn't even do his horrible jewish mobster thing justice. him calling jimmy -"yimmy" is as funny as he gets, which as you can see is not funny at all. the movie "a few good men" was pollack's best and only on screen presence, like eminem says to moby "too old, let go,it's over, nobody listens to tecno" take a hike kevin. amanda peet. what a "peety". you know you have sunken lower than low when all the guys in the theatre are waiting to see your t.ts and not even listening a word you say...we don't even get to see her t.ts, but get a corny suggestion that we almost do which is not only cheap but degrading for her as an actress, why even fiddle with sexual jokes if you are gona cover her up in towels?...like the 98 percent of this film, her being in this film is a false promise. as for mathew perry, a star of the hit show friends...proves once again that he HAS no friends in real life, because if he did...they would have stopped him from acting in this amazingly awful film. unlike kevin pollack, this fella is young...i have no idea what eminem would have told this guy to do, maybe this will suit him "you are too doped, too boring, let go, it's over, nobody listens to techno"? … Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. PeterN.
    Aug 1, 2004
    0
    I don't know why I get sukered in to watch these sequels. The movie is rubbish. Another big flop wait for the TV movie. Bruce Willis supposely adlibs in movies and even he can't carry this picture. No story, no laughs, couldn't wait for it to finish. Bored me to tears.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. NathanH.
    Aug 6, 2004
    0
    It blows piles, avoid at all cost. Rather clean your bath, would be time better spent. Not natasha showing some clevage would have saved this crap movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. WendelC.
    Apr 18, 2004
    0
    So bad that I think I am going to puke. Avoid.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. ScottF.
    Apr 21, 2004
    0
    Maybe this will be one of the greatest things to happen to movies in years. Historians will point to the release of this movie as the beginning of the end of pointless sequels to terrible movies, made only to satisfy the greed and cynicism of talentless Hollywood studios.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. P.H.
    Apr 8, 2004
    0
    What's the point of this mess? The first one was awful as well.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. JeremyN.
    Apr 9, 2004
    0
    The worst movie I have ever seen!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. RissieF.
    Apr 9, 2004
    1
    Not funny. Boooorrring!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. SloanN.
    Apr 9, 2004
    1
    I hated it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. ChadS.
    Jun 9, 2004
    3
    Is Kevin Pollack supposed to be Larry Tate from "Bewitched"? His accent is painfully unfunny. Bruce Willis cries and we forget to laugh because Robert DeNiro has already cornered the market on neurotic sociopaths. Matthew Perry isn't a very good physical comedian. He works too hard for laughs and gets winces instead. What made "The Whole Nine Yards" a somewhat amiable comedy was Amanda Peet's surprising flair for comedy. If Perry and Willis allowed Peet to be the focal point, we might've had a watchable film. Pat yourself on the back if you can endure the whole ninety-seven minutes of "The Whole Ten Yards". … Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. Sungus
    Aug 31, 2004
    2
    Hey Efe B., your review was about as stupid as this movie, and less funny. At least during the movie I smile twice and laughed once. Old women farting just get to me I guess.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. MichaelM.
    Oct 22, 2004
    2
    You thought "The Whole Nine Yards" was bad, you ain't seen nothing yet. Thumbs down.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. MikeN.
    Apr 26, 2004
    3
    I like all the actors, but I didn't like what they did here. I did smile a couple of times. But no laughing occurred during the screening.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. MichaelR.
    May 29, 2004
    1
    What the crap was the point of this? The first movie was "alright" at best; wasn't too good, but worth watching once or twice, but it definitely didn't warrant a sequel. Blah.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. RonC
    Jul 31, 2004
    4
    Wow! I am so out of touch with critics. Okay, this wasn't a GREAT movie, but I'd sit through it 10 times before I'd watch "Crouching Tiger" again. I must live in my own little world. "The Whole 10..." isn't that bad.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. LighterThings
    Mar 29, 2012
    5
    Everything that was enjoyable and funny about The Whole Nine Yards was reattempted in this sequel that fell flat on its face from the word "Go." While by no means a terrible film, The Whole Ten Yards holds none of the original quirkiness, fun of the first, while also trying to work around an absurd plot that makes absolutely no sense. While somewhat funny, the film really isn't worth the watch.
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
24 out of 100

Generally unfavorable - based on 27 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 27
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 27
  3. Negative: 18 out of 27
  1. Variety
    Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    40
    The strain needed to extend The Whole Ten Yards a yard -- and to feature length -- is so painfully evident it breaks new pic's comedy spirit, making it a particularly dubious member of the Sequel Hall of Shame.
    Read full review
  2. The Hollywood Reporter
    Reviewed by: Kirk Honeycutt
    50
    Things spin swiftly out of control with uneven acting and misfired physical gags.
    Read full review
  3. The A.V. Club
    Reviewed by: Nathan Rabin
    30
    The least necessary sequel since "Agent Cody Banks" embarked on a London mission a few weeks ago.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »