- Studio: Summit Distribution
- Release Date: Nov 21, 2008
User Score
5.0
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 737 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 333 out of 737
-
Mixed: 92 out of 737
-
Negative: 312 out of 737
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
VanHMar 22, 20094The Movie and the books are total crap. It makes no sense that a vampire wouldn't kill other humans not suck human blood and go out in the open light. This movie is a poor exucise for a vampire film.-G.A.T.E.T.V. Van Helsing & Blade.
-
-
LeighWMar 25, 20092
-
-
BrianMar 25, 20094
-
-
IvanG.Mar 29, 20091Mainstream crap churned out to please people of ages... well, it wasn't really made for anyone- just people stupid enough to be convinced by a mormon that "vampires are perfectly normal people" or that a vampire doesn't drink blood or kill, it just has glitter skin in the sun... If you went to see this film, consider yourself on a warning.
-
-
MoebiusApr 3, 20093
-
-
dereksApr 4, 20090By far the worst movie ever made in the history of mankind. Biggest waste of 2 hours ever created.
-
-
MarkKApr 5, 20094A good book turned into on of the most over-rated (emo clad garbage) films ever made.
-
-
sursJun 1, 20091
-
-
FranciscoM.Jun 14, 20094It's definitely entertaining but it's popcorn entertainment. You sit in your couch, you see this movie and 30 minutes later you won't remember watching this.
-
-
KeenanS.Jun 15, 20093
-
-
ShaneBJun 17, 20092Twilight is, quite frankly, a film in which only 16 year old goths will enjoy. While the film does at times have some decent Cinematography, the plot is over exaggerated, the acting is poor, the writing is uninspired and the film at times looks just plain ugly, making Twilight, in my opinion, one of the worst films of the year thus far.
-
-
SeanF.Jul 20, 20090Just a dreadful, dreadful movie. Vampires playing baseball, flying? Come on, at least stay close to the confines of conventional vampire lore. The movie started off as if it might actually be going somewhere, but never does (anywhere interesting at least). Rent one of the Underworld movies instead of watching this.
-
-
AngelaHAug 10, 20090This is without a doubt one of the worst films I have ever seen.
-
-
SebastianCSep 30, 20091Bar none, one of the worst films ever made. I understand this is a teen flick, but the script is appalling, the acting is dreadful, the directing is terrible and the whole thing is just physically painful.
-
-
GeorgeC.Nov 21, 20080I'm not kidding, its like the worstest movie of the year by far. It is so pale, dull and boring. Nothing exciting ever happens. It is emotionless, and you just can't wait for it to end. And the visual effects, they were awful! But most of all, why would you make a movie adapted from the lamest hit chick flick novel out there. And the story: Booooo.
-
-
BillbillyNov 21, 20082
-
-
KellyNelsonNov 22, 20082
-
-
AgnesNov 23, 20080A High School Play has better acting than this. Make that a Middle School ! The audience was actually laughing at how stupid this was. Save your hard earned money to buy a new book. Let's see a vampire that is out in daylight, doesn't bite his victims, and looks in the mirror. And to think we all thought that Dracula was the exact opposite. Live and Learn!
-
-
CarinNov 24, 20080I loved this book, but I went into the movie with low expectations because of the previews.
Alas, it didn't even live up to those low expectations. This really is the worst movie I have ever seen. Now I haven't seen Plan 9 from Outer Space, so it may not be the worst movie ever made, but it's pretty close. -
-
LouE.Nov 24, 20081Bram Stoker must be turniing in his grave!!!!!!!
But I know I'm not the intended audience, I never read t he book, I'm not a tween, I'm a guy and I have a brain, it might as well been brought to us by Disney. All in all just a buch of pretty white kids pretending to act. totally messed up the Vampire genre -
-
ArtemONov 29, 20082Probably one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Acting sucked, the girl wasn't pretty, and they were hardly even vampires! Not to mention normally when I think vampire I think action but this movie had none.
-
-
anDec 12, 20080
-
-
JimmySoDec 21, 20084Children are getting mixed up in all things superhumanly strong, bloodthirsty, and garlic-adverse. If you have kids, you might not want them interested in sharp fangs, but the silver screen does, and it
-
-
SarahK.Dec 8, 20080This has to be one of the worst teen lip flicks I've ever been forced to watch. I am sorry I let my sister drag me to this. I made the mistake of reading Stephanie Meyer's writing before, and I won't make the mistake of seeing any more of her movies.
-
-
AnonymousMCDec 8, 20081This movie had no character development, and no passion. It was a complete flop compared to the books. And what was with the stuttering during the hospital scene? Kristen sucks in this movie. She doesn't even capture 1/4 of the essence of Bella. Save your money and read the books again.
-
-
MonicaNov 23, 20090Am I mistaken, or did I just read comparisons to "Romeo and Juliet" and "Lost Boys." Are some of you daft or just mentally challenged? OR can you at least admit that you were never able to grasp the world-renown play or cinematic classic and got a "C" in your High School literature classes. Holy Hell, how aggravating it is that some of you represent the United States in critical thinking.
-
-
JacobNov 30, 20090What a waste of my time. Bella is a weak, shallow woman in an imbalanced relationship. Edward (if he wasnt "hot" would be seen as a creepy, geriatric pedofile and a stalker. The "vampires" are so unvampiric its just sad that Meyers is allowed to even use the term for her creatures. Lots of boring angsty staring and laughable dialog. Give this a miss.
-
-
JohnT.Oct 14, 20090
-
-
RachelDec 16, 20092There's supposed to be chemistry between the two characters, I didn't notice any. And some emotion would've been nice. Maybe some sound/music in the first half would've entertained me and my friend also. Unless you like Robert Pattison I don't think you'll like the film!
-
-
TizzyDec 26, 20090
-
-
RichardA.Mar 23, 20092
-
-
NateK.Mar 24, 20091I read the book and saw the movie, but it wasn't that great. The book wasn't the best, and had some major flaws, and the movie adaptation was absolutely horrendous. Not only did it have terrible special effects, the actors were disappointing in their performances. Perhaps the second movie will be better, but not by much.
-
-
RyanM.Mar 26, 20093Ridiculous. Sappy. Like a bad MTV video or after school special. Really geared for teenage girls.
-
-
JasonHMay 16, 20094I thought this movie was written just as poorly as the book was. The whole thing was blah and looked and felt like a t.v. show made for the WB!
-
-
HannahHMay 17, 20090This movie is so lame and stupid, with hardly any plot at all. It damages the definition of a vampire!!! Vampires are supposed to be evil creatures who suck human blood. And Edward Cullen?! He "sparkles", DOESN'T drink human blood, and falls in love with Bella!! Stupid. The only reason some people like this is because of the cheesy romance in it.
-
-
EnzoP.Jul 16, 20093Twilight is a very bad movie. While was watching it I felt so weird because every five seconds you see kirsten stewart and robert pattinson staring at each other awkwardly. Just look at the picture on the top of the page. Although it did keep my interest through out the movie.
-
-
MikeR.Nov 21, 20080
-
-
MelissaM.Nov 22, 20084
-
-
AnonymousMCNov 22, 20084The acting was stilted at best. There was no basis for the attraction between the main characters. Besides, how can you fall in love with your food? Also, why would someone who is 108 years old go back to high school? The vampires in Underworld, a parallel movie concept, were much better thought out. And yes I watched the movie.
-
-
fhalloNov 22, 20080
-
-
ConnorNov 22, 20080Absolute garbage...
It's nearly impossible to relate to ANY of the main characters, they screwed up the entire vampire concept, and the female lead is dumb as a sack of bricks. Not only that, but their relationship did nothing for me.
Don't get me wrong, I'm normally a sucker for this kind of thing, but this movie just left me with a feeling of disgust. -
-
DanielleGNov 23, 20084
-
-
KenzieP.Nov 23, 20084
-
-
GearoidMNov 24, 20082From around half way through onwards people were laughing. I wasn't sure if it was a comedy or not. That's 2 hours of my life I won't get back, unfortunately. The acting was poor and it was sooo slow. My wife enjoyed it - mostly because she spent the entire movie drooling over the lead actor.
-
-
SteveKNov 26, 20084Who knew a movie about vampires could be so boring? It plays like an episode of the OC or some teenie bopper show like that. Dawson Creek with vampires. Sorta. And how often do we even see the vampires being vampires? If you saw that mostly teenage girls were watching this and you got concerned, then DON'T WATCH THIS MOVIE. That is your warning sign.
-
-
BenM.Nov 29, 20080
-
-
MattB.Dec 27, 20081
-
-
AlexG.Dec 27, 20083
-
-
AlexH.Dec 28, 20080
-
-
JimBNov 18, 20091
-
-
Sep 9, 20110This was the most boring film ever i sat through. I wonder why they took "actors" for this "vampire-movie". A non bloodsucking vampire is as much a vampire as a potato. In a film with non bloodsucking potatoes they could have saved on the budget though.
-
Dec 7, 20112
-
Apr 25, 20134This movie isn't terrible, just not very good. I found it incredibly boring and cheesy for no reason. If you enjoy romantic movies, only watch this if you're really bored :P
-
Apr 14, 20130This movie I simply awful.
The worst performance I've ever seen. Specially when two of them are talking.
If I could I would ask Stephenie Meyer that does she even know what a vampire is?
It's a shame...
-
63Twilight will mesmerize its target audience, 16-year-old girls and their grandmothers. Their mothers know all too much about boys like this.
-
50A disappointingly anemic tale of forbidden love that should satiate the pre-converted but will bewilder and underwhelm viewers who haven't devoured Stephenie Meyer's bestselling juvie chick-lit franchise.
-
In the 17-million-copy land of "Twilight," the calling card isn't blood and fangs, but the exquisite, shimmering quiver of unconsummated first love. By that measure, the movie version gives really good swoon.