- Studio: Screen Gems
- Release Date: Jan 20, 2006
User Score
8.3
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 251 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 211 out of 251
-
Mixed: 8 out of 251
-
Negative: 32 out of 251
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Feb 14, 201110why are "professional critics" so dense?
-
Oct 1, 20114This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Dec 11, 20112How can a movie as bad as Underworld get any worse? That was what I found myself wondering at the end of Underworld Evolution, a film so colossally bad it deserves some kind of award to emphasise the fact its dreadful. It has a terrible script, two wooden leads, a boring supporting cast and some awful set pieces. It's just bad. Really, really bad.
-
KenW.Apr 27, 200810I cant help it. I loved the movie and of course Kate Beckinsale. I think with her accent, outstanding good looks, and charm she would make any movie enjoyable.
-
-
PerE.Jul 7, 200810
-
-
JayK.Jan 21, 20091I'll give it a 1 because i like the color. other than that its just blood and guts with ridiculous storyline and characters. underworld 1 is much much better.
-
-
CarlosFJul 18, 20090
-
-
DrewJan 20, 20069Better than the first in evey way. Plus seeing Kate Beckinsale half naked was worth the price of admission in itself.
-
-
DaveB.Jan 20, 200610This movie was awesome. The best action movie i have in a long time. As with the first movie don't expect any Oscar's here......but if you go to movies to have a good time check this one out or go see Brokeback Mountain...your choice. Personally i'm sticking with Kate Beckinsale in all of her butt-kicking skin-tight outfit wearing glory!!!
-
-
GrantN.Jan 20, 20063
-
-
VanM.Jan 20, 20069
-
-
RickB.Jan 20, 20068More exciting than the first and more interesting, too.
-
-
AaronS.Jan 21, 20068
-
-
RyanW.Jan 21, 200610Underworld: Evolution was a continuous of forbidden love. It explored all the elements of protecting that love, something Lucian and Sonja (Viktor's Daughter) weren't granted.
-
-
JasonQ.Jan 21, 20069I thought this movie was great! Although not as much of a story as in the first one. The ending left a little to be desired.
-
-
MikeW.Jan 21, 200610Great Movie. Marcus is very cool & Kate again sexy. The first one is nice, but to slow. The sequel is fantastic!
-
-
SteveJan 21, 20068
-
-
MattJan 21, 20062The critics are right this is a 2 or 3 out of 10 movies. The fact the user score is 9.1 scares the hell out of me. It's people like that are responsible for hollywood to continue to make these generic, lame, stupid, retread movies.
-
-
H.P.Jan 21, 20069Wow a lot better than i thought it would be!! Lots of violence, and a good ass kicking all around, i like how they kept it moving so you wouldnt have to endure the crappy acting.
-
-
RyanD.Jan 21, 20065There were far too many flash backs in this movie to maintain any fluidity. There were also far too many errors, Lycans and Vampires went from being almost impossible to kill, to being as fragile as mortals. And worst of all the two original brothers were killed with any of the myths holding true.
-
-
GusJan 21, 20065
-
-
GregoryF.Jan 21, 20069I give this movie and 8.5-9 because I really enjoted it. I Twas a fun, entertaining film. The special Fx for the most part were better and on par then first. The action was great. Marcus and Kate both did great jobs. If you like the orginal see this movie. I don't think critics give it enough credit.
-
-
HarryM.Jan 21, 200610All i can say: PERFECT! Thank you Len for this masterpiece.
-
-
MaxC.Jan 21, 200610The critics are NOT right. Just 35% for the Sequel of Underworld 2? Tsss, the user votes are RIGHT. This movie is great. I don't understand the critics. This is not a 3/10 movie, it's more. Great action, great cast, nice story ... Marcus was great. he's the real Dracula and not the kid of Blade 3. I loved this movie and i must see it again! 10 Points!
-
-
DavidM.Jan 21, 20064
-
-
DarenM.Jan 21, 20069
-
-
JGJan 21, 20065It was o.k. There was long sex scene. I thought it would have meaning to the film i.e. baby hybrid or something. No nothing at all. The brother feud was weak storyline at best. Michael was supposed to get weaker because lack of blood but Selene gives him a few drops here and there he is a stallion. This was almost a complete waste of film.
-
-
AlexJan 21, 20067I guess it would have helped if i had seen the first movie, but there were some parts of this movie that just didn't make sense. it was good, but not quite what i had expected.
-
-
GodComplexJan 21, 20069Simply awesome.! Great action, and good flow from first movie to the second, sorta like LOTR. Stil....I feel that there has never been a movie that has captured a VtM esq storyline/powers, or the over all curse of vampirism very well. Even Interview with the Vampire seemed lacking. The Underworld series has been a continued suprise.
-
-
TaylorS.Jan 22, 200610
-
-
TracyM.Jan 22, 20069I would have given it a higher score if we weren't cursing the well place leg hiding the view of Speedman's bootie. Come on, it went so low on Kate's abs, I thought maybe Len was filming a home movie.
-
-
B-dawgD.Jan 22, 20068
-
-
EricY.Jan 22, 20068
-
-
PatirckJan 22, 200610
-
-
MottJan 22, 20060The movie is about a 2 or 3, but I am giving it a zero because its stupid people that go to these movies and rate it 8s and 10s that make someone in hollywood make worse sequels off of already terrible movies.
-
-
SeanD.Jan 22, 200610once again the critics know nothing, great sequel to a great movie!
-
-
BenK.Jan 22, 20062Apparently Uwe Boll has followed up Bloodrayne with this stinker. Both films lack a soul. Within the first minute I regretted purchasing a ticket. Boring, pointless, confusing, this film has no redeeming value except to make money. Who cares about action or special effects if you have nothing to say and can't even tell a story. Taking someone to this film is akin to kidnapping.
-
-
MarcDJan 22, 20060Another waste of time from Beckinsale. First Underworld...then Van Helsing...and now...this mess.
-
-
DarthCapricusJan 22, 20067I liked it alot. The special effects were awesome.
-
-
BrettPJan 22, 20068
-
-
NickJan 22, 20069It delivered. Much better than the critics said.
-
-
ThomasRayJan 23, 200610Perfect Vampire Movie!
-
-
MadelinemellerJan 23, 200610Oh yes, this Movie was fantastic. Gory, bloody & sexy.
-
-
KevinGJan 23, 20068Normally I dont go to these sort of films so didnt go in with any expectations, never saw the first one and really enjoyed it... enough said really. The Critic are being far too harsh on this one.
-
-
mvJan 23, 20068If you liked the first you'll love this.
-
-
WilliamGoodallJan 23, 200610Excellent sequel. Anyone who liked the first film will find this one bigger faster and better. People who didn't like the first one will dislike this one even more.
-
-
TylerT.Jan 23, 20069
-
-
TonydannieJan 24, 20069This one was as good if not a tad better then the original. Kate is still HOT sexy on her skin tight outfit and the flying Vampire would kick the crap out of Van Helsing's Dracula any day. Great popcorn flick.
-
-
BrentH.Jan 24, 200610
-
-
DavidB.Jan 24, 200610
-
-
CameronB.Jan 25, 200610Bloody Awesome!
-
-
DianaJ.Jan 25, 200610The movie was great, I hope there is another part to this, I love the scenes in this one, it was better than the first.
-
-
KevinS.Jan 26, 200610I thought this was really good, it also added alot of action and gore to this one. also i dont get why every critic is saying this movie was bad. i cant wait till this one comes out on dvd.
-
-
DinuF.Jan 26, 20069Not smart, but very entertaining for rainy sundays. We liked it and the only drawback was that its end came somewhat surprising.
-
-
DavidJan 26, 200610great movie and very intense. I found nothing lacking in this movie and will be waiting for #3.
-
-
PaulC.Jan 26, 200610It was incredible.....I liked it more than the first, not to say the first one was bad, but with more gore, action and a story line that did make sense no matter what the boring critics say it was great. I saw it twice in the theatre and my friends loved it too. Its a must see, and i hope they make another one.
-
-
TomD.Jan 28, 20061
-
-
ThomasI.Jan 29, 20061I made a mistake. I went in trusting the user reviews on this site when I should have have known that they exist only to berate critics that know what they're talking about. I haven't made such an error since "Mission to Mars" six years ago, and I was humiliated beyond reason then. Stupid 15 year old goth kids and their bleak, bloody, Blade / Matrix clone junk.
-
-
ChelseaD.Jan 30, 20060Did everyone who rated this movie so far have something to do with it or something? Even for popcorn movie bull, this movie was god awful. The first one was at least fairly decent, but I can't believe I wasted my money on this crap.
-
-
JasonY.Jan 30, 20060Anyone who sees this movie should be prepared to feel just a little taken advantage of after all is said and done. Clearly it's intended for lower life forms. Although, I think even plankton or jellyfish would be bored slimeless by this pathetic tour de farce. They manage to make Kate Beckinsale in tight leather depressing for God's sake!
-
-
MaxL.Feb 1, 20061Crappy movie. What the heck was all the fuzz about? Terrible and even worse dialogue than the first one. Yes, Beckinsale is still looking way hot in latex but that's just not enough. Gorier and bloodier than the first but not better and the first one wasn't that good to start with.
-
-
NickBFeb 5, 20068
-
-
JonS.Feb 7, 20069
-
-
BrookeFeb 8, 200610I thought the movie was great! It was exciting, and it kept you on the edge of your seat the entire time!
-
-
ChrissyFeb 11, 20065Im somewhat surprised at how high the users have rated this movie. Although it most likely will greatly appeal to certain groups of people. It definately has an immature flavor to it. Not unlike the first movie, it makes little sense when you watch it. Not one of the worst movies of the year, but hardly worth the money. Definately find a better movie to go see.
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 17, 20060This sequel makes even less sense than the mediocre and boring first movie.
-
-
ClongTTFeb 20, 200610Great action packed movie. Great entertainment. Not for those looking for a Syriana or Constant Gardener.
-
-
RyanB.Feb 21, 20069This movie is not the best movie but it is really good. The story is about vampires that go to war at each other because one vampire wanted a key to realese his brother from a prison that was stone in a small tight space. He gets the key and kills is father for it. Parts in this movie are hard to follow but near the middle to the end you should understand everything.
-
-
RyanF.Feb 27, 20067Although this movie has some really weird occurences: Why are they in another country and why is a 19 year old [whatever] having sex with a god-who-knows how old vampire. The heli scene at the end of the movie was action at its best. But, I think I can only recommend this movie to people who have seen the first. I look forward to Underworld 3.
-
-
[Anonymous]Mar 3, 20067Good movie overall, but the action far overpowers the plot (which is actually a very good plot, if you can get to it well enough) and Kate's acting is mostly horrible - though she does look good in tight clothing.
-
-
ChadS.Mar 3, 20063
-
-
MikeF.Mar 4, 200610Perfect Vampire Movie. Great Action, good CGI Effects, great Score and again a sexy Kate Beckinsale.
-
-
PaulA.Mar 11, 20069This movie was great. i think if the critics had watched ultraviolet first then maybe the critc score would have shot up another 20 points for this movie, it has style and action i like the story much better than the movies its being compared to(blade/matrix). overall this is just a fun movie nothing more nothing less.
-
-
KelvinL.Mar 15, 20067
-
-
ValerieL.Mar 21, 20064Lots of chances, to tell an interesting dark Vampire story...but lots of blood, a long love-scene and too long fight-scenes do not compensate the worse and confusing story. Just another bad Vampire B-movie. What a waste of time.
-
-
JackS.Jun 7, 20068Better than the first and better than I expected. They developed the history more which was nice but was still able to be inventive with the action. Overall a good popcorn flick. Don't take it too seriously.
-
-
AlecB.Jun 13, 20061This is got to be the worst piece of crap in movie history.i mean come on i couldve took my video camera to my basement and filmed a better movie than this crap.the first of the series was great so i thought that this was going to be good but boy was i wrong.if it wasnt for all of the voilence i wouldve gave this crap a zero.
-
-
RogerJun 19, 20069Great storyline, special effects borderline great, acting was very good. Looking forward to rest of story.
-
-
AndyP.Jun 20, 20062I found this movie hilariously bad! The sex scene with Scott Speedman humping Kate Beckinsales abdomen was especially great. The plot was incoherent, the action was kind of boring, and the acting was mediocre. How this has as high a user rating as it does baffles me, but it did give me more laughs than any other movie this year!
-
-
ChrisW.Jun 24, 20061What the hell was that? I enjoyed the first one because it was very unique, but this one... boring! I'm only giving it a 1 because Kate is smokin' in that outfit.
-
-
ChrisH.Jul 13, 20068
-
-
EmilyD.Jul 25, 20069I loved this movie like i love the 1st one, though the 1st one stayed more to a capible theme more so, than the 2nd one it was still good! somethings were a lil off but it explaned the 1st one to me much better!...& it stayed w/n the same plot!..so i every much so enjoyed it & have seen it 5 or 6 times.
-
-
HansN.Aug 9, 200610Awesome movie loved every minute.
-
-
KeithJ.May 11, 20072
-
-
PatC.Aug 27, 20075From a plot standpoint, unengaging to the point of inducing naptime. Despite the colorless light, some pretty precise special effects work. The two romantic scenes between Kate & Scott where actually quite tasteful, with good music and no dialogue. Could have fooled me, but it was almost like the two of them had some kind of chemistry going.
-
-
NicoleT.Sep 28, 200710
-
-
Aug 23, 20106More vampires vs werewolves nonsense but this time the big, top, head cheese vampire is back & he's annoyed & trying to find his brother. Much better than the first in that the story is a lot stronger, the effects are more convincing & less pouting from Kate Beckinsale. One or two silly moments but the opening scene is very good indeed.
-
Feb 19, 20129
-
May 6, 20127
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
42There's a ton of backstory behind Underworld: Evolution, which gets slightly denser and rowdier than its predecessor, but it's ultimately all in the service of a nigh-endless series of numbing, mechanical battles in which snarling protagonists and CGI monsters shoot, claw, and bloodily eviscerate each other. In other words, it's "Underworld," but more of it.
-
40Unfortunately, there's little wit or genuine suspense to elevate the proceedings above the level of a cheesy comic book.
-
70Overall package is potent. A few rock-the-house scenes of slam-bang derring-do -- are nothing short of sensationally exciting.