User Score
7.3 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 76 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 60 out of 76
  2. Negative: 12 out of 76

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. JamesO.
    May 18, 2009
    10
    A very good prequel movie. I definitely hope they make a 4th in the series sometime after the events of the 2nd movie. Definitely a must watch movie!
    • 3 of 3 users said yes
  2. Oct 1, 2011
    4
    "Underworld: Rise of the Lycans" is the same tedious vampire vs werewolf movie. There's nothing new, but its Michael Sheen's brilliant performance that will keep you entertaining.
  3. CariN.
    Mar 24, 2009
    8
    I wish I could actually decide to watch a movie based on a movie critic's review... but yet again they totally got it wrong about this movie. I wasn't expecting much when I went ahead and watched it but actually liked it almost as much as the first Underworld and definitely better than the second in the series. Any fan of this genre should at least see it once just for the epic werewolf (what seems like 1000 werewolves) stampede. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  4. GeorgeM
    May 20, 2009
    7
    I've never been a HUGE fan of the Underworld series...always loved the concept but was indifferent with the execution. The films have been a combination of soap opera-like drama and over the top borderline absurd action, but for the most part they were "fun". Rise of the Lycans is probably the better film of the series...while the 2nd film was the most polished of the 3, this one has the most "oomph" behind it. The action seems a bit bigger and borderline epic...given the material, but it still comes off a bit flat. It tells the story of a Lycan (Lucean is his name, I believe) and how he rose from being a slave to the vampires, to a sort of leader. He dosen't really hate the vampires..at first...just tolerates them, but when its exposed that he is having secret "meetings" with one particular female vampire...well...the worst happens, and he quickly becomes veangful and hate-filled. The action is over the top, which is to be expected...the FX are nice one minute and Nintendo 64 graphics the next, which is ALSO to be expected...overall...entertaining as an action film. I've always hated the use of color...these films are like "Visual Sleeping Medication"...the use of blacks and blues makes my eye-lids heavy, but its the "mood" of these films. In the end...its a worth a look if youre a fan of the series and a buy for the more hardcore. I had my fun with this film...but its nothing im gonna plunk the money down for. Recommended as a RENTAL. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. Jag
    Feb 7, 2009
    8
    This one is by far better than the first two. There were some pretty good characters in it. This also puts a completely new approach on the series will make you actually think about which side you want to win the war. Normaly in movies like this there are the bad guys and the good guys but this with this movie thats just not the case. It is more realistic in the sence of both sides having there rights and there wrongs because in real life people are rarely completely bad and never completely good. So in the end it will just come down to your own opinion. Assuming you saw the first two. But this isn't a bad place to start if you haven't or if you have no other way of watching the others. This one was alot more emotional that the others. Big time. I won't give anything away but by the time your done watching the movie you will definitely notice that. It was good and I'm glad I went to see it. It was worth it. I also liked Rhona Mitra's charicter way more than Kate Beckensale's because it was a ton deeper. The whole series has just gotten a ton deeper thanks to this prequel. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. MisaaA.
    Jan 23, 2009
    10
    a must watch gory prequel to the two amazing underworld movies.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. KM.
    Jan 24, 2009
    1
    I despised this movie on every level. From the incredibly bad overacting of the lead villain to the entire storyline which had nothing novel, nothing to say, and nothing to show. Absolute crap. It insults your intelligence at every level. Give some credit for decent set design but this is the type of movie that they make you watch in hell.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. RobertB.
    Jan 25, 2009
    10
    I'm a fan of the series and this film was more of the same which as far as I am concerned is the perfect recipe. Complex story, great visuals, action etc. Loved it!!!!!!
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  9. AnonymousMr.
    Jan 26, 2009
    10
    the entire series was amazing.....the story is intelligent, amazing action sequences and great acting. Fills the gaps of the wanted answers.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  10. BobYoungman
    Jan 26, 2009
    10
    Good plot, all of us at the office thinks that is helps explain some of the backstory, although Kate is hotter
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  11. TomS
    Jan 26, 2009
    10
    Great prequel! It fleshed out some of the characters you had seen from the other two movies better and helped explain the past. I really like it. Underworld was great, Evolution was better, and I think this one was right up there.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  12. YokikaH.
    Jan 31, 2009
    3
    I was very disappointed in this film!!! I have read some of the views from some of you & my question is, "If you're such fans of the Underworld series why didn't you get board with the movie???" I was reading someones comment saying that it asnwered a lot of questions. What kind of questions did it asnwer cause the frist movie told this entire story!!! This movie didn't even go with the first movie!!! It was like it was it's own story not a continuation of the first or second movie. I kept sitting there saying when are we going to get past all of this & jump to the future. It told the majority of the story the same as they told it in the first movie until they got to the end. The way they killed them (lucian & sonya)was different from the first movie cause they had an audiance before but not in this movie & also lucian was supposed to have thought dead (in the first movie viktor thought lucian was dead) not Viktor. So to me the thought of the rise of the lycans would have been the present day lycans comming back agaisnt the vampires & that is how the new daughter of viktor makes her way back to the vampire family since she is an outcast now, There is so much more I was looking for withthis movie but not a story that I already know. It was a good movie for someone that had not seen the first movie cause action wise it is good. But for a huge fan of the first Underworld movie this was a waste of my money. I could have waited till it hit the dollar movie theater or even video. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  13. jimbob
    Feb 3, 2009
    10
    Awesome film. victor is a badass.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  14. gurgoni
    Mar 3, 2009
    10
    I'm not a fan of Underworld, however I enjoyed the first two. And now this prequel, which as many say "needless" absolutely completes the first two. One can bragg about how needless it is and how badly it displeased him or her, but one would never tell straight up, that actually they were expecting a "new story". Just be honest. However we all knew very well, at least should have known, long before the movie came out in theaters, that it is in fact a prequel. You don't have to be a fan of Underwolds to know that "Rise of Lycans" would probably be about the times when warewolves had to rebel against the vampires. Of course when opressed, when else woudl they?! Good job, awsome movie. P.S.: Someone had a good point, but Where in the first two of Underworlds did Viktor say or think that Lycan was dead?! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. jessen
    May 14, 2009
    10
    Most reviews where bad i believe this movie really captures the concept that everyone can get along lol. but the battle between the vampires and the lycans is a good mix.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. JoseB.
    Jan 23, 2009
    9
    I enjoyed this movie even though I felt the FX could have been a little better. Great job Michael Sheen, Bill Nighy, Rhona Mitra, Steven Mackintosh, and Kevin Grevioux
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. KV.
    Jan 24, 2009
    7
    it could had been better but its really well made with little errors.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. JasonV.
    Jan 24, 2009
    10
    Great film. kept with the original direction of the other two films. A+ a must see film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. CharlesV.
    Jan 24, 2009
    9
    This is one of the best vampire/werewolf movies/series visually ever made.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. AndrasG.
    Jan 26, 2009
    10
    Great movie! Best in the series. I hope that they will continue the story from the end of that movie. Loved it. Can't wait for the blu-ray release.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. RobB.
    Jan 26, 2009
    10
    I thought the movie was fantastic. even my wife loved it and shes not really a fan of this type of movie. great action, told the story well, i loved it. for sure will buy it when it finally makes it to dvd. If you at all liked the first 2 underworld movies, do yourself a favour and go see this. you won't be disappointed.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. Ezra
    Jan 27, 2009
    9
    Very well done. Great plot, good acting, and not corny like the 2nd one!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. MelissaE.
    Jan 27, 2009
    8
    I thought it was an entertaining flick. Certainly kept my attention more than Benjamin Button!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. Zo
    Jan 28, 2009
    10
    Very good film. I loved all of the Underworld movies and I think that the third instalment is just as good as the others. Michael Sheen is fantastic as Lucian!! A must for fans of Underworld.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. RA
    Feb 21, 2009
    10
    Better than Underworld 1 or 2. From Effects to scripts to acting.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. JohnO
    Feb 25, 2009
    10
    This was a fantastic movie. Richard Gere is top notch as the cave troll. Darryl Hannah was incredible as the golden dragon. Of course, we can't forget about the Coen brothers, who both made cameo appearances as the werewolf twins of Oogletville. Finally, Josh Groban was excellent as the vampire who managed to sing a few awesome heart wrenching tunes that destroyed all the lycans. Last but not least was when Ricky Schroeder showed up as the elder vampire and demanded 500 cows be sacrificed in his honor. You have to see this movie. Classic. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. CoreyD.
    Feb 3, 2009
    9
    Very good story, very good acting. Didn't suffer without Kate. Really enjoyed it and hope they continue the series.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. JayH
    May 6, 2009
    4
    I didn't care for the other Underworld films, same goes for this unnecessary prequel. All special effects, no substance or real point. Dark dreary and unappealing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. SamM
    Jun 7, 2009
    3
    Cgi was awful, the story overwhelmingly bad. not one good thing to say. underworld 1 & 2 you just cant compare to this trash.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  30. CarlosF.
    Jul 18, 2009
    6
    All I can say is that this movie was a total surprise ! The first Underworld movies were nothing more than plotless funny trash. But this movie was surprisingly good, with REAL good acting from Bill Nighy and Michael Sheen. And, opposite to the other UW movies, this one has a PLOT. This epic forbidden love tale was really interesting. The action scenes were just more of the same. I'm glad Beckinsale was not part of the cast. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. KeithJ.
    Jan 24, 2009
    6
    If this movie weren't part of a trilogy, it would be a decent standalone fantasy/action movie. As part of a trilogy, it bothers me a little because it sets aside established concepts of how the various creatures compare in power. In this installment, vampires are basically regular people with pale skin and sun sensitivity. They compare equally with regular humans in combat, and are, for the most part, no match for werewolves. That annoyed me, but for the most part, I enjoyed this prequel to the superior and original Underworld, and the horrid Underworld II (Evolutions). Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. [Anonymous]
    Jan 24, 2009
    7
    For those who are following the bloodlines, this is a fairly accurate telling of the story we all knew. Sheen and Nighy are excellent actors and held the movie together even with poor dialog and bad acting by the other cast members. A must see for fans, not so for newbies.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. MarkN.
    Jan 24, 2009
    9
    I liked it. Script was a bit stiff at times, but a good prequel to the original.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. eyeresist
    Jan 25, 2009
    9
    The critics seems to be mindlessly repeating the received wisdom, as they usually do. Pity the fool who ranks the lamentable Underworld Evolution over this film! I went in to this film expecting trash, but was pleasantly surprised at every turn. Performances are uniformly solid (I thought the much-praised Sheen was actually one of the less interesting performances here). Bill Nighy seems much more committed to his part than previously, perhaps because he had a lot more to do here. The faux-classical dialogue was surprisingly solid, and from the mouth of Nighy sounded almost like Shakespeare (or at least Marlowe)! The story had an grimly hermetic feel, to match the claustrophobic sets, which accounts for the feeling of dark inevitability more than any accusations of "predictability" (of course a prequel will be "predictable"). Apart from fans of fantasy, horror and action, this film will appeal to anyone looking for a story elemental in structure and pitch black in tone. (There is only one cringe-worthy moment, which you will spot at the end of the sex scene). Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. MarcG.
    Jan 25, 2009
    7
    Fun and entertaining.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. AvidMovie-goer
    Jan 28, 2009
    7
    Loved 1st Underworld, loathed the 2nd (Evolution). This one was decent or a bit better than decent. I thought the parts dealing with the growing love, granted the core aspect of the prequel, was a bit excessive. (meaning, what took 5-10 minutes could have been done in 2-5 mins and still gotten across the same point) and the shortening of these parts would have made room for more plot development and/or action....either would have helped. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. ChrisV
    Jan 28, 2009
    10
    There was less gun action. Plenty of brutality still. Great special effects. More plot driven than the first two. I like both lead actresses. I think the Underworld series does the best werewolves. My only complaint is that William (Lucian's brother, head of the "animal" lycans)was only touched on, and I can't help but be intrigued by his story since seeing him in the second movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. AlecB.
    Jan 28, 2009
    7
    Easily the best in the series.. Finally No Guns or bombs or any of that shit.. Just vampires and lycans tearing eachother up.. Plus Viktor was actually a badass this time
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. MarkH.
    Feb 16, 2009
    3
    Thorougly "meh". At an hour and ten minutes (not counting the credits) it's pathetically short, bland, and uninspiring. The third or fourth time they did a similar slow pan over Bill Nighy sitting on his throne for dramatic effect, I wondered if they were going to keep using that shot every time they wanted to make a dramatic impression. They did.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. LoganE
    May 17, 2009
    10
    Excellent film, great effects. I don't know why the critics did not like this one. I personally like the first one the best but this fills in much of the mere flashbacks in the first Underworld. They brought back some great characters and tied things together nicely with a dark romanian bow.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. mikek
    May 26, 2009
    8
    I just watched this and it is really good ..the story that was talked about in the first film is their plus visually as well and the casting was perfect though it had a slow start which is the only problem i had with it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  42. Mar 12, 2011
    0
    I liked the first one. This one...well...it is SO bad that it really doesn't deserve the words to review it. There is absolutely nothing good to say about this movie. Don't they screen these things before finally releasing it ? Somebody, anybody, must have noticed that it sucks on each and every level. Simply appalling !
  43. Dec 13, 2011
    5
    While nowhere near as bad as the 2nd installment of the Underworld series it is still a toothless, soul sucking experience. The change in setting and time period actually help with the return of menacingly good villain Bill Nighy. The loss of Kate Beckinsale can only be seen as a positive (although she does bookend the film) with a prequel story which knows how to have fun. Rise of the Lycans doesn't take itself seriously which is one of the main reasons its enjoyable. However they have gone from one wooden female lead to another with Rhona Mitra's Sonja being just as useless and tiresome as Beckinsale's Selene. While bringing back Michael Sheen and making it an origins story does add a certain gravitas, it fails to wow or at least entertain mainly due to its clearly reduced budget, wooden female lead and depressingly bleak design. Not awful but nowhere near great. Expand

Recommended Products

  1. Underworld: Evolution Image
  2. Underworld Image
  3. Blade: Trinity Image
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 14
  2. Negative: 4 out of 14
  1. Reviewed by: Kim Newman
    20
    A needless threequel. Note to director: avoid 'rise of the' titles.
  2. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    50
    The enterprise is sluggish when it's not grinding toward the preposterous.
  3. Reviewed by: Joe Leydon
    70
    First-time helmer Patrick Tatopoulos (who designed creatures for all three pics) offers a satisfyingly exciting monster rally that often plays like a period swashbuckler.