User Score
7.4 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 66 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 50 out of 66
  2. Negative: 10 out of 66

Review this movie

  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Oct 6, 2012
    8
    The trailer makes it look more terrifying than it really is, but I love the concept, especially the way the stories are linked and the primitive nature of the "tapes." Unlike many horror flicks which spend the bulk of their running times in mundane establishing scenes, this one gets right down to business. There are some good laughs, and some truly gross and gory moments, along with some Paranormal Activity-esque jump-out-of-your-seat moments. The integration of sex is obviously nothing new to horror, but the recurrent sense of coercion makes the proceedings feel a bit more taboo & dangerous, which works with the rough and grimy feeling of the movie. I'd recommend it to mainstream horror fans looking for something a little different. Expand
  2. Oct 8, 2012
    7
    This movie arrives during an unfortunate time where found Footage movies are coming out in waves. However, this is a notch above most of them. It's not perfect but it does add some new fresh twists and in today's world that's enough to warrant a recommendation and put it above most movies in this genre. This is an anthology, so for those who've seen Creepshow it's like that except these are found footage movies or for those who haven't seen that movie, it's basically a bunch of mini movies(5 to be exact) all put into one movie. The story is really simple, it's a group of guys who get hired by some unknown party to break into some old man's house and retrieve a video. However, it's not as easy as it seems since there are stacks of VHS tapes so they have to start watching them in order to find the right one but that's not their only problem as something else lurks in the house. Before I say anything, none of these movies are ever boring. With that being said, some videos work better and are genuinely a lot creepier than the others. The second film, while intriguing is not scary at all. I see what they writers were trying to do(a side note: each video had different writers and directors) but it never came off as creepy or suspenseful, luckily it's not long. The 3rd film is also not that scary, but it does have two generally creepy shots and I like how they actually made the camera a crucial part of the video. The 4th film is scarier than the 2nd and 3rd as it does provide a nice "Boo" moment or two but compared to the first and last film, it's not as effective. The first, and last films as well as the actual film(the guys breaking into the house to search for the tape) is where the actual scares of the movie lie. The first and last movies are so well done, beautifully told, and creepy that they make up for the lack of scare in the movies in between. The actual story itself is extremely creepy too, as once they break into the house you know they're not alone. A lot of scary stuff happens in the breaks between each short film. I also like how(with the exception of the 2nd film and the main story) that they manage to incorporate the camera in a way where it's a crucial part of the film(hence the third and fourth film) or avoids the common found footage movie flaw, why can't they just put the dam camera down? In first and last film, the person either has the camera in their glasses or in their costume so they manage to avoid that pitfall. I'm trying to avoid describing each film because it's more fun when you don't know much about a movie. I should also warn that this movie is certainly not for everyone. I've never seen this much nudity in a film before(both male and female, both frontal and back) and some of these films are sick and twisted. So those of you with an easy stomach, you've been warned. n a time where found footage movies are coming out on a monthly basis(or so it seems), it's nice to see a movie like V/H/S that completely surprises you by putting a little twist on a genre that's become monotonous. Sure some films are better and more frightening than others but this movie is never boring, at least to me it wasn't. This is also a notch above most horror movies today because it's you know, it's actually scary, something lacking in most horror movies today. It's also a **** slap to those watered down, lame PG-13 horror movies(with the exception of Insidious and The Woman in Black of course) that are constantly coming out every week(at least, that's what it feels like). Horror fans should be pleased by this movie, and it's a nice edition to the found footage genre. Expand
  3. Oct 5, 2012
    9
    This movie is definitely something extremely different from any other horror anthology that I've seen in a long time. A lot of really original stuff and some good scares from time to time. If you like genre bending stories then this is the movie for you.
  4. Oct 5, 2012
    4
    No, it's not different from any other horror anthology. The only satisfaction is that all the annoying hipster victims get deserving deaths. The VHS stylization is a welcome change, and the effects look decent enough to be believable, but the whole film approaches a campy horror film than a snuff film.
  5. Oct 5, 2012
    8
    V/H/S again a new horror movie, what happen? The movie is very creppy, interesting, but the problem is the next: we watch much found footage movies, and the viewers can know everything that includes this films. In my opinion is the second best horror movie of the year -the first is The Cabin in the Woods- is funny, creepy and interesting.
  6. Jan 20, 2013
    9
    as i can't think of any other way to do this, i will give each segment a rating, all of them deliver at least some scares, not all of them work as well as they're meant to, but hey, it's scary, violent, and quite fresh, ironically enough, because of it's nostalgic qualities, it puts every other found-footage horror film to shame, now, with the individual ratings: 1 - 8.1 2 - 9.2 3 - 7.6 4 - 9.1 5 - 6.5 6 - 8.9 Expand
  7. Oct 6, 2012
    8
    1.Tape 56 = 5.9/10 2.Amateur night = 9.4/10 3.Second honeymoon = 6.1/10 (disappointed in you, Ti West) 4.Tuesday the 17th = 9.1/10 5.The sick thing that happened to Emily when she was younger = 4.4/10 (should have been cut) 6.10/31/98 = 9.3/10

    As a whole = 8.2/10
  8. Oct 8, 2012
    5
    Not a horrible movie by any means, but not exactly a good one either. It has it's moments, incredible special effects and kills for a low budget horror flick. But the majority of the stories fall flat and some of the acting is just plain awful. I give it credit for trying something different in this as good as dead gimmick of found footage movies.
  9. Oct 13, 2012
    9
    This film takes the Paranormal Activity trilogy and Cloverfield where the sun don't shine. I loved this movie, a lot, but at the same time, don't want to watch it ever again. Good thing I didn't throw up mid-movie. Bravo, Magnet Releasing! Well, wait. The camera shaking in a few of the stories were way too up-there for a sober dude, and way too still for a drunk group of guys... there's always room for a re-try (sequel, hint-hint. please?) here, in my opinion. Great job, guys! Expand
  10. Mar 9, 2013
    5
    This movie started on a high note, ended disappointingly. This is basically a anthology of horror shorts. The way they go in between the shorts is actually good. But unfortunately the shorts are far from good. They are entertaining but not scary at all. The first short with the woman from the previews is actually really creepy and actually kinda scary, the others aren't. Also this movie has a lot of nudity so don't watch it with anyone you'd be embarrassed to watch that with like parents. Expand
  11. Feb 10, 2013
    6
    I didn't really expect much from a film named "V/H/S" but to be honest i was surprised with the delivery. although there were a few stinkers in this film most of them were enjoyable and frequently scary. Would it be the best film of 2012? NO! is it close? maybe.
  12. Mar 14, 2013
    4
    Besides the first story the rest were pointless. V/H/S is not the worst horror movie of the year, but the gimmick in this movie doesn't make the movie better.
  13. Mar 16, 2013
    9
    This movie has all the right creep-factor going on, while avoiding slipping into torture porn territory. It's an anthology, with the stories all having significantly different tone. The acting might not be the best in the world, but none of it noticeably bad, and you never get pulled into disbelief due to someone not delivering their part well. By the nature of the stories being anthologies, each gets in, sets itself up, and delivers in a pleasantly timely fashion. Expand
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 21
  2. Negative: 1 out of 21
  1. Reviewed by: Owen Williams
    Jan 15, 2013
    80
    Like last year's "Chronicle," here's another reminder that in the right hands found footage still has plenty of capacity to surprise.
  2. Reviewed by: Bill Goodykoontz
    Oct 23, 2012
    60
    The problem with V/H/S, a compilation of sometimes scary horror shorts loosely bound by an overarching plot, is that, no matter how savage, evil or sadistic the killer, the victims almost always come off as bigger jerks.
  3. Reviewed by: James Berardinelli
    Oct 5, 2012
    50
    V/H/S comes across as a production that wants to be more than it is but, as they say, The Emperor has no clothes.