Metascore
10

Overwhelming dislike - based on 26 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 26
  2. Negative: 23 out of 26
  1. Lewd, crude, blessedly brief.
  2. Reviewed by: Andy Seiler
    38
    A cynical sex comedy that manages to be infantile and jaded at the same time.
  3. Reviewed by: Ken Fox
    30
    A misconceived roundelay that crosses the thin line dividing gross-but-funny from just plain gross.
  4. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    25
    A crass, witless knockoff of better films.
  5. Ugly. ..and unpleasant -- and clueless on a grand scale.
  6. 20
    This gross sex farce actually has a point, though about half the population won't like what it is.
  7. Reviewed by: David Germain
    16
    A caustic, raunchy, often hilarious examination of how men use women.
  8. I was consistently aghast at how unabashedly alpha-male, heartless, and chauvinistic this film is.
  9. Reviewed by: Joe Leydon
    10
    Grotesquely smutty and obnoxiously overbearing, this is a pitiful excuse for a comedy.
  10. Reviewed by: Robert Horton
    10
    This movie has straight-to-video written all over it.
  11. Hang out at a frat house or sports bar, and you can hear this kind of talk for free.
  12. 10
    If all-out headache-nausea-braindeath is what you crave, Whipped's available.
  13. Way too bleak to be funny, even as a contemporary satire of the battle of the sexes.
  14. 1
    Whipped is cinematic suicide, if not for actor, then certainly for audience.
  15. The trouble with Whipped isn't that its characters are dirty mouthed horndog jerks -- it's that they're phony dirty mouthed horndog jerks.
  16. 0
    Its film school aesthetics and sophomoric storytelling are sense-deadening.
  17. Breaks new ground both as an abominable enterprise in guy-talk and as no-budget hackwork.
  18. Reviewed by: Chuck Wilson
    0
    As repellent as their characters are, one feels a degree of pity for the three male leads, who give fresh evidence that hungry actors can't say no to a studio feature, no matter how humiliating the script.
  19. Bottom-feeding monstrosity of a comedy.
  20. Reviewed by: Tom Keogh
    0
    We're forced to listen to misogynistic rantings devoid of wit, entertainment value, or even authenticity.
  21. Perhaps there is a more excruciatingly painful and self-abusive way to spend 82 minutes. But I honestly can't think of what it would be.
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 18 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 10
  2. Negative: 3 out of 10
  1. Dec 9, 2014
    6
    this was a very original movie and it DID make me laugh, but there are some things about it that are so cheesey and over the top that it'sthis was a very original movie and it DID make me laugh, but there are some things about it that are so cheesey and over the top that it's just ridiculous. it has a lot of style. i liked the direction. but the underdevelopment of Mya is a huge flaw that can't be overlooked. supposedly these 3 guys are all in love with her, yet there's no reason for it, not even exceptional looks. as i type thise, the current user average is 5.9...that's about right. Full Review »
  2. Jan 27, 2012
    1
    This movie is truly awful. My friend and I sometimes challenge people to sit thru it, "The Whipped Challenge". Odd thing, only at the very endThis movie is truly awful. My friend and I sometimes challenge people to sit thru it, "The Whipped Challenge". Odd thing, only at the very end is there any redemption of what you painfully endured. Full Review »
  3. RJK
    Nov 14, 2011
    10
    The film was mostly preposterous but Linda Udd as Subway Girl was a vision of loveliness for all of her five seconds. If the director knewThe film was mostly preposterous but Linda Udd as Subway Girl was a vision of loveliness for all of her five seconds. If the director knew enough to make a film worth watching he would have seen her radiance and centered the film around her. Full Review »