- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: May 26, 2006
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 346 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 206 out of 346
-
Mixed: 59 out of 346
-
Negative: 81 out of 346
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
StephanieN.May 27, 20062It was horrible.
-
-
JamesH.Jul 27, 200610It was the perfext way to end a series. I still hope for X4 though.
-
-
Sep 21, 20115The movie is overall visually stunning, but "X Men: The Last Stand", unlike "X Men" or "X2", is ultimately a frantic war movie that contains extremely sparse character depth/development and simple, lethargic action that fails to appeal.
-
Mar 28, 20125It's the most visually stunning from the first three movies, but again like the first film, it's either rushed or consist only action. And because of that, the sad moments are not allowed to be sad. But visually amazing.
-
ByungSukJan 3, 20075I liked it at first but then I realized they totally destroyed the X-Men Lore. [***SPOILER***] I'm so sad that Professor X died. When I saw him explode in the theater, I was like "WHAT!! They can't do that" but then I realized that I was still in the movie theater.
-
-
Feb 3, 20123I had the saddest time in my life when I missed it in tv. When I finally saw it, it was like WTF? I give this WTF 3 points. Overall, the average score for the 3 films from me is 5.0.
-
JonathanH.May 26, 20063Very Good special effects, very bad story. I was extreemly disappointed that they made a movie based on a very popular comic series, but followed none of the mythology based on the comic series.
-
-
JaredC.May 26, 200610Brett "the rat" ratner couldn't of done any better. I mean come on this is the dude who did rush hour 2!For me, it falls in between the first and the second. It was a great movie!
-
-
JosakJun 1, 20066My complaints are pretty much the same as everyone elses; bad script, bad dialogue, poorly executed plot and the movie was just too short. It really didn't feel anything like the previous two movies. The characters were totally stale, no depth whatsoever. Pretty disapointing, considering how much potential the movie had. In any case, it's worth seeing for a few, cool action sequences.
-
-
JonC.Aug 6, 20060Terrible. I'm glad I waited this long, but I still wish I hadn't seen it. Idiots! They totally messed up the series. There is so much wrong with this movie, I would hardly know where to begin. It doesn't make sense on its own, much less in context with its two excellent predecessors. It is ridiculous at best and jarring at worst.
-
-
MyAug 8, 20061
-
-
jrdMay 28, 200610
-
-
MikeR.May 29, 20063In a category with T3, Johnny Pneumonic, the Matrix 2, and Stars Wars Episode One. If you liked those movies, by all means, feel free to check out X-3. (all six of you).
-
-
SteveO.May 30, 20060I never comment about bad movies. I usually just let them be. I could not stand to not warn people about X-Men: The Final Stand. It was horrible. It had no character development for any new characters. Absolutely made NO SENSE at all. I hope Ratner's "last stand" is Rush Hour 3!
-
-
ConundrumMay 30, 20068
-
-
GutierrezL.May 30, 20069Muy buena.
-
-
TarynMay 30, 20061
-
-
PatrickB.Jun 1, 20062Worst of the series. Should have been called "the Hugh Jackman and Halle Berry film" Very disappointing, convoluted plot.
-
-
LynnL.Jun 1, 20062
-
-
ScottA.Jun 1, 200610Best movie I have seen in last few years. Love the storyline and the surprises. Great action sequences too!
-
-
TheShizzleJun 2, 20065
-
-
BillG.Jun 3, 20067I actually still have some issues from the original "Dark Phoenix" saga from the X-Men, and the mutilation of the original plot somewhat disturbs me. The over-focus on Wolverine in this movie, combined with the absence of Nightcrawler, marred the overall experience. It's good, but nowhere near the jaw-dropping experience I've come to expect from the X-movies.
-
-
TMoneyJun 4, 20067A solid summer movie going experience. Nothing spectacular but suprisingly better than I expected. The first two films in the franchise were good...nothing spectacular, but good. So I guess, this third (and possibly) last falls right around the same level of quality. The last act of the film was the best with some of the best action sequences I've seen in this genre of film.
-
-
GaryE.Jun 5, 20068I bought into the anti-Ratner bit. I wanted to be let down, but found myself entertained through its entirety. Even through the cheese I found myself winching less than I thought. This is popcorn more than substance but the inner child in me said "Cool!"
-
-
RobJun 5, 20068
-
-
ALVAROJun 6, 20069Great movie, some characters have not been well developed but for instance wolverine is still wolverine and the movie is still great because is pure entertaining even better than the previous X-Men movies.
-
-
JoshuaE.Jul 1, 20062This was actually considerably worse than I thought it would be. Poorly executed at every turn, X Men 3 was obviously placed in the wrong hands. Not even the terrible , but frenetic, action scenes could inject any life into the limp story and characters. There was no drama, no humor, and especially no brains. Brett Ratner is the Joel Schumacker of the X Men franchise.
-
-
SheliaC.Jul 4, 200610better than superman better than all of them but spiderman 1 and 2.
-
-
WilliamOct 11, 20069[***SPOILERS***] The movie is not a finale as any who has read the comic (or watched pass the credits know) however for a closer to events in the first two it is a great movie! I liked the fact they went with the more human looking Beast, however I was confused on where Night Crawler went, and why he was not even included in the background of this movie..
-
-
AnonymousMCOct 14, 20068
-
-
josakOct 25, 20066Big disappointment; the action scenes were decent, but the characters and story were flat. This series had a lot of potential, and I think it was ruined with this movie. Still worth a rental though.
-
-
BuckShotOct 7, 20060
-
-
JeanGreyOct 9, 20064
-
-
SeldoV.May 25, 20067Worse than the second, marginally better than the first, the missing ingredient is definitely Bryan Singer.
-
-
MichelleC.May 25, 20069While this movie started out slightly cheesey, It goes out with a bang. X3 is action packed and, at times, shocking. If you liked the previous two, I have little doubt that this too will be enjoyable.
-
-
CarlosF.May 26, 20068
-
-
JonH.May 26, 200610I thought it was very good. A few parts that were suprising and parts where they didn't follow the comic books at all, but that left for alot of suprises and entertaining twists. I'm giving it a 10 because well I can. :)
-
-
JudS.May 26, 20063
-
-
tonydannieMay 26, 20068
-
-
GaryM.May 26, 20066I'm underwhelmed by Ratner's attempts to develop significant emotional content via the crudest brick-to-the-face method possible. I am depressed by the number of professional reviewers who, by referring to this episode as "the last in the series", obviously didn't actually see the movie.
-
-
ChasemanMay 26, 20068
-
-
DylanS.May 26, 20067No where near as good as it should have been. Singer should never have left, but Ratner did the series justice. I wonder if the continuation of this franchise will lead to him becoming more honed in the craft.
-
-
WongitMay 26, 20068
-
-
IvanC.May 26, 20065Flat, cheap, dumb movie, which lacks all that good ideas of previous and is an insult for those, who prefer to be entertained well. Looks like trash-movie, actually. Where did all the money go? And this after such brilliant X2. Well, i suppose, most of the 7-s the movie gets here would be from 'under 16'-viewers.
-
-
JarrodG.May 26, 20061If you actually know the comics and your not your average movie-goer dullard, your going to hate this movie. The movie is very rushed and it pisses me off that they take no respect in finishing a franchise that Singer worked so hard to get it were it was in the last film.
-
-
SteveG.May 27, 20064If you think Beverly Hills Cop 2 was an american classic. You will love this move.
-
-
TyeN.May 27, 20066
-
-
AkisK.May 27, 200610If you like the two other,you will love it!
-
-
BobbyH.May 27, 200610Great action scenes and special effects - which was expected, but the payoff was getting to see all-new X-Men and the hope for anyone who has ever felt like an outsider. They will identify with need to feel special nad accepted. Hugh Jackman is hot as hell, and Vinnie Jones played a fierce brute, playing Juggernaut.
-
-
WAKOJAKOMay 28, 20063
-
-
ChadT.May 28, 20068Aside from a few obvious logical blunders, I actually liked this more than the first two. Better special effects, better characterization, and more emphasis on Wolvie made this a highly entertaining action film.
-
-
DaveB.May 28, 20069
-
-
VerbalKinchMay 29, 20063
-
-
MattJ.May 31, 20066The first two x-men set standars, which everyone felt should be matched in this third installment, what the first two did was meant you left the cinema thinking it was entertain and (excuse me) also had the x factor, however the third one just about manages to entertain but nothing more.
-
-
NeilV.May 31, 20064This movie was pretty poor. Horrible script and plot, poor execution, a terrible way to abuse the finest superhero team in history. A huge disappointment following X2.
-
-
JaspreetS.May 31, 20067pretty good movie, but seems like they left a bit of an opening to make more movies at the end.
-
-
JohnnyA.May 31, 20063
-
-
FoxL.May 30, 20067
-
-
RIsinSonMay 30, 20065
-
-
SeamusSMay 30, 20067Once you get over yourself and the bad dialouge....It's lots of fun.
-
-
jeremyW.May 30, 20063
-
-
MaseJun 11, 20068Still the best superhero franchcise around imo. Ratner obviously drops the ball in terms of direction obviously. Singer's shoes are huge to fill, and it's felt here. But these characters are still the best and most exciting to watch. I had a great time.
-
-
JesseH.Jun 1, 20066
-
-
MusicaliD.Jun 12, 20062
-
-
BobD.Jun 13, 200610I love x-men and this thirth film of the serie was so preety good.
-
-
BonbonA.Jun 17, 20066
-
-
MelB.Jun 2, 20067
-
-
CraigA.Jun 2, 20065Meh. Entertaining, but not as interesting or exciting as the second installment. After making Angel the centrepiece of the trailer, it turns out that he actually does next to nothing in the finished film. What a waste. Famke Jansen on the other hand looks great. Beautiful and malevolent.
-
-
AlisterL.Jun 2, 20065
-
-
MarkZ.Jun 2, 20068Ian McKellan stole the show.
-
-
MattR.Jun 23, 20065
-
-
FabioP.Jun 2, 20063This is definitely one of the worst movies i've seen in recent times. The script sucks ass, characters are flat, dramatic moments are acted and directed so badly that they make you laugh. Then, the action sequences are just ridiculous, and the dialogues were so banal...i swear i heard many of the movie's lines in at least a hundred movies before. This movie is just stupid.
-
-
TonyF.Jun 2, 20064Really disapointing, halle Berry has way too much screen time, the chacters that have been developed in the past two movies are passed aside in this bizzare adaptation of two separate x-men plots gon crazy. Alot of oneliners is the majority of the script, if you are a true fan go see it, if not wait for it to play on tv, in like three years.
-
-
RogerB.Jun 4, 20068Best of the bunch!! Amazing how few are catching the final scene after the credits!
-
-
MarcL.Jun 5, 20069
-
-
JoeG.Jun 5, 20064
-
-
SarahG.Jun 6, 200610
-
-
scarecrowJun 7, 20065
-
-
TonyC.Jul 6, 200610
-
-
GiovannaJul 6, 20069
-
-
JoeAverageJul 9, 20068Could Bryan Singer have directed a better version? Sure. But karma being what it is, he's now associated with Superman (Doesn't Quite) Returns. Personal bitterness aside, I was surprised at the quantity of numerous memerable scenes. The ending felt rushed though. Still the best 'summer flick' I've seen this year.
-
-
jasMSep 8, 20061the movie wasn't as impressive as the first, the storyline was hopeless, it made no sense, and the young actors need to go back to acting school.
-
-
Cyclops1987Feb 4, 20071
-
-
ScottC.Mar 5, 20070
-
-
alexrApr 8, 20098I liked this movie. It was very exciting and there was a genuine tension as to who would make it out alive in the end. It wasn't quite as good as X-2, which is a genre definer, but certainly a worthy addition to the X-men series. I thought it was better than the first movie too.
-
-
SuperFriendOct 3, 20067
-
-
JackS.Oct 3, 20064
-
-
AlexanderH.Oct 7, 20068
-
-
PaulK.May 24, 20069
-
-
GregW.May 25, 20068This is by far the best superhero movie I've seen. It did things that were completely unseen and possibly hated but without would only have been an average movie.
-
-
MikeMay 26, 20063This movie was really bad. The effects were cool but for some reason it all felt ridiculous. The plot didn't make much sense either. A lot of holes. The death of some major characters were unnecessary and disheartening. Finally, some of the lines were so lame that I cringed.
-
-
SuleimanM.May 26, 20069Fantastic, how about you gusy watch it before saying it's bad, that would be vital. By the way, Halle berry was HOT!
-
-
PJGMay 26, 20067Not bad, still wish Singer was involved... Stay after the credits... It really saved it for me.
-
-
TimF.May 26, 20069
-
-
ChrisJ.May 26, 20062Overall I felt X3 was a sticky pile of inconsistency and absence of detail. The dialogue was poorly written and poorly delivered. The characters seemed hollow and pointless. The directorial change is something everyone must accept, however I would have rather seen and entirely new character roster than have so many favorites dismissed so casually, permanent or otherwise.
-
-
ChrisD.May 26, 20061
-
-
joshMay 26, 20062
-
-
JamesT.May 26, 20068
-
-
LawrenceM.May 26, 20066Rater kills off character instead of showing character development. [***SPOILERS***] Two main players "die" only to come back at the end of the film. Too much corny action and not enough dialogue. X3 was a proverbial kick in the nuts to comic fans.
-
-
DavidC.May 26, 20062X3 is too absurd even for the X-Men universe. I have no problems with people having mutant powers, but having those powers doesn't mean they lack common sense. No one would ever be as grossly inefficient and ridiculous as this film portrays. Also, if you know anything about technology you'll laugh at how bad it is. A typical blow-em-up, shallow, waste-of-money miss by Hollywood.
-
-
70Though the picture is not without its wow-inducing, SFX-driven moments, that potent X-factor is considerably diminished in Singer's absence.
-
It's a fast and enjoyable B-movie, though, and Hugh Jackman's Wolverine brings some good stormy drama to the proceedings.
-
60Singer's absence is felt but not fatal. By adding too much new blood Ratner loses some of the original DNA, but with its nifty set-pieces and a few nasty surprises, X3's still a worthy enough sequel to ensure it's no Last Stand.