Christian Science Monitor's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,346 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
56% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
42% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 3.9 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: |
Critic Score
100
|
|---|---|
| Lowest review score: |
Critic Score
0
|
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,985 out of 3346
-
Mixed: 1,041 out of 3346
-
Negative: 320 out of 3346
3,346
movie reviews
- By critic score
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
The acting is sincere and the camera work is pretty, but this art-movie variation on "The Sixth Sense" doesn't have enough energy to fulfill the high promise of Berliner's previous picture, the enchanting "Ma vie en rose." -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
In all, it's “Diner,'' female style. Directed by Donald Petrie from a blatantly manipulative screenplay that took four people to cook up. [24 Oct 1988] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
The message of the film is that life isn't neat and predictable like a well-arranged business trip; yet everything in the picture is so calculated that there's no life to it. [23 Dec 1988, A& L, p.19] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
Armageddon may sell tickets, thanks largely to a high-powered marketing machine that's been conducting its own countdown for the past several months. But it's not a pretty picture. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
The Abyss' isn't abysmal, but it's a replay of hits we've already seen - a recycled "close encounters of the wet kind'' with far too few ideas of its own. [18 Aug 1989, Arts, p.10] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
Verhoeven's lurid thriller has moments of welcome self-parody, but most of the action manages to be sensationalistic, homophobic, and tedious at the same time. [20 Mar 1992, Arts, p.12] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
John Hughes pours his usual slickness and sentimentality all over everything. [27 Feb 1987] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
Judged by the standards of ordinary filmmaking, it's as strange, suggestive, and surreal as other Lynch pictures have been. Judged by the standards of Lynch's own career, however, it's amazingly stale and second-hand… [and] contains not a single moment of genuinely felt emotion. [1 Sept 1992] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
The main performances are generally weak, although the smaller ones are sometimes brilliant, and the yarn never builds much momentum as it leapfrogs from one subplot to another. [28 Dec 1990, Arts, p.14] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
A second-rate adaptation of the second-rate Choderlos de Laclos novel: two hours of pretty people sitting in pretty rooms and talking about sex. [23 Dec 1988, A& L, p.19] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
As before, the movie is more impressive for its finely detailed vision of Los Angeles as a futuristic slum than for its story, acting, or message. It's all downhill after the first few eye-dazzling minutes. [2 Oct 1992] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
The director, Taylor Hackford, doesn't have the cinematic savvy to sustain so many tensions in a meaningful way; and the screenplay strays far over the line between incisive political comment and heavy-handed Red-baiting. -
-
-
Critic Score 38
Punchy, cleverly stylized, but utterly empty yarn about a feisty young woman who welds by day, disco-dances by night, and dreams of the day when she can devote her life to her art. -
-
-
Critic Score 38
The story is mostly a rehash of the original "48 Hrs.," with the same hard-boiled mixture of violence and wisecracks. Directed by Walter Hill, who specializes in this kind of thing and gives it a certain conviction, if little else. [13 Jul 1990, p.10] -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
Blending animation and live action, this ferocious fantasy is hopelessly vulgar in ways never dreamed of by "Who Framed Roger Rabbit." -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
While the production is attractive in a calendar-photo sort of way, there's not a speck of genuine feeling in its glossy images. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
The stagebound setting gets boring; the action doesn't build a steady momentum; and the characters do far too much hanging around until the camera's ready to point at them again. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 38
The combination of caveman dialogue, overcooked action, and anything-for-an-effect performances is maddeningly crude even by cop-movie standards. [22 May 1987, p.23]Posted Mar 19, 2013 -
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
Parker is bland throughout. Maybe all those episodes of "Sex and the City" have soured her on this sort of thing. -
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
If, as the ads would lead you to believe, you go to see The Break-Up expecting a romantic comedy, you will be severely disappointed. If you go to it expecting a good movie, you will also be severely disappointed. -
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
Its wasted cast includes Dyan Cannon, Sally Kellerman, Len Cariou, and Brenda Vaccaro, who miraculously manages to give a fine performance in this malarkey. -
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
Just because The Fountain is different doesn't mean it's good. In fact, it's borderline unwatchable, though this hasn't prevented the Oscar buzz from buzzing. -
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
The movie often seems glib in the face of tragedy. And when, near the end, Shepard tries to pour on the hearts and flowers by showing us just what made Simon crack up on camera, the bathos is icky. The whole movie is icky. -
-
-
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
Few things are more dispiriting than a holiday movie straining to become a perennial. Such is the case with Fred Claus, an insipid Christmas comedy. -
-
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
The Bucket List is a movie for oldsters that, paradoxically, looks as if it was made for 15-year-olds. If this is what is meant in Hollywood as "thinking outside the box," then it's time to get a new box. -
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
The best thing you can say about Mad Money is that it has a good cast. The worst thing you can say about it is that the cast is extremely ill-used. -
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer 33
This business of the 88 minutes ticking away is a pale imitation of the old "High Noon" ploy of playing out suspense in real time. After a while, though, I began to take a perverse pleasure in wallowing in the awfulness of it all. -