- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
Sure, Mick's life is ridiculoous, but you don't go lookin' for realism between "Ghost Whisperer" and "Numb3rs." [05 Oct 2007, p.67]
-
63Moonlight. It's basically "Angel" without the search-for-a-soul underpinnings that gave Angel depth, and with a more ponderous script and less adept cast.
-
60The focus is on the dangerous and forbidden relationship between Mick and Beth and his efforts to keep his past a secret. Whether there's enough material there to knit together a series remains to be seen.
-
50What's not fun? At least half of the rest of the show.
-
50With a winning lead player and supporting cast, plus an interesting premise, Moonlight has potential.
-
50It doesn't go quite far enough into uncharted territory but gets off to a basically promising start nonetheless.
-
50Moonlight falls somewhere in the middle of the new paranormal pack. It's neither great nor awful.
-
40Something got lost between concept and execution, and instead of suspense we get silliness
-
40While it is formulaic and slow-paced, Moonlight is stylish entertainment with a charming star aimed at a specific audience--the folks who stay home Friday night and watch CBS.
-
40Alex O'Loughlin is bogged down by trite dialogue, half-hearted support, perfunctory exposition, and better-to-look-good-than-make-sense production priorities.
-
40The show plays like bad imitation noir where the private eye can occasionally sink his teeth into the villain.
-
40Moonlight is just a weak, generic private-eye drama with a vampire story overlay.
-
40It's just sort of an underwritten mess.
-
38Moonlight, unfortunately, doesn't trust its audience and so falls to exposition via a fake talk-show interview at the beginning, and then throughout with dialogue dully delivered by Internet investigative reporter Beth Turner (Sophia Myles).
-
30The direction is flat-out awful (there are many choppy shots from bizarre, if not inexplicable, angles). Much of the dialogue is groan-inducing, the acting by some of the guest actors is jaw-droppingly wooden, and I guessed who the villain was way before the halfway mark.
-
30The hacky writing is interchangeable with any of CBS' police procedurals, and the boy-band good looks of Alex O'Loughlin as the detective, Mick St. John, inspire neither fear nor dark sexual longings
-
30In almost every way, Moonlight demands that we question the grounds for its existence.
-
30It's hardly bloodcurdling adventure, but it doesn't bite.
-
30[Mick and Beth's] across-the-decades bond, however, doesn't compensate for how pedestrian the initial story is -- playing like a conventional detective show, with Mick showcasing his otherworldly powers (strong, and very, very fast) only during a passable action sequence in the final act.
-
30Much of Moonlight is amateurish, but nothing is more amateurish than the artificial chemistry between O'Loughlin and Myles.
-
30I don't know exactly why Moonlight, which acquired "Veronica Mars'" adorable bad boy, Jason Dohring, as a second-round draft pick, seems so very lifeless.
-
25This one is almost impressively wonderless.
-
0It's just heinous. Absurd, laughable, painful to watch--you name it, Moonlight has it all.
-
0This vampire detective show (sorry, can't resist this) is one that first bites, then sucks. Hard.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 375 out of 395
-
Mixed: 1 out of 395
-
Negative: 19 out of 395
-
10
-
10
-
LiliM10For me it is a great series. I WANT A SECOND SEASON!!!!