- Publisher: Ubisoft
- Release Date: Nov 20, 2012
- Also On: Mobile, PlayStation 3, Wii U, Xbox 360
User Score
6.0
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 687 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 360 out of 687
-
Mixed: 121 out of 687
-
Negative: 206 out of 687
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Dec 29, 20120Expected much more than I got. It really is unfortunate that they'd incorporate such a bad ending in an attempt to milk the series in the future. Don't expect anything groundbreaking.
-
Dec 16, 20122
-
Jan 15, 20134
-
Dec 23, 20124
-
Dec 20, 20123
-
Nov 30, 20124
-
Dec 11, 20120
-
Mar 31, 20134
-
Apr 1, 20132
-
Jan 27, 20132This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Nov 22, 20123
-
Mar 12, 20130
-
Dec 26, 20120
-
Dec 29, 20122Its a copy paste AC game... There is absolutely nothing knew to this AC game besides the story. The gameplay is exactly the same as the others. If you want a good AC game take up brotherhood, where you have options on how to play along with an amazing story. Even the main character outside of the levels goes, "oh this again?" Whenever he begins a sequence.
-
Mar 7, 20131
-
Dec 3, 20124This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Jan 17, 20134
-
Nov 24, 20122
-
Apr 29, 20134
-
May 2, 20132
-
Mar 15, 20132
-
Dec 2, 20120
-
Mar 8, 20134Aside from the naval battle, everything else in this game is complete crap. Aside from the naval battle, everything else in this game is complete crap. Aside from the naval battle, everything else in this game is complete crap. Aside from the naval battle, everything else in this game is complete crap.
-
Mar 14, 20134This is by far the worst, or rather said, the only bad AC game. Not only is it set in a boring time, with boring citys, storys, people, weapons and armors, but the citys are so small that there is almost no climbing at all. I cannot believe this is an AC game. They need to go back to the roots, keep the new graohics but go back in more interesting time zones.
-
Dec 3, 20121
-
Dec 25, 20120
-
Jan 30, 20133
-
Mar 5, 20133This game is a real dud of a game. The only two interesting game features in the game are the ship battles and the decent combat. All story and side missions suck and the game is full of bugs, waiting around and meaningless drivel. I am fan of AC2 and Revelations but this installment is completely skippable and uninteresting.
-
Nov 21, 20120This game has turned into call of duty and their just churning out new ones each year, wait till this goes on sale for $20 or something, I do not know what I was thinking when I bought this....
-
Dec 10, 20120**** Assassin's creed title yet. There is a lot to do, but absolutely nothing is fun. Combat is just silly and once you watch an hour of combat you have seen it all. Sidequests don't feel important. Stealth no longer feels important or fun for that matter. Connor is a dipsh*t. The story doesn't make sense.
-
Feb 6, 201380Assassin’s Creed III proves to be, despite its promises, a rather indecisive game. It comes with so many strong elements, that it could have been the best Assassin’s Creed ever, but it fails to harmonically balance those elements. [January 2013]
-
Jan 29, 201385Assassin's Creed 3 offers a spectacular way to fill in the blanks in your knowledge of the American Revolution - it never holds back on scope, drama or action.
-
Jan 23, 201384What, no French revolution? For Europeans, birth of the United States is not really very interesting time nor environment. And after Ezio (or Haytham Kenway), Connor is bland, irritating protagonist. Game is also full of chores that add very little to the experience. [Jan 2013]