- Publisher: 2K Games
- Release Date: Jun 14, 2011
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
5.8
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 948 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 484 out of 948
-
Mixed: 131 out of 948
-
Negative: 333 out of 948
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Jun 20, 20114
-
Jun 16, 20110
-
Sep 16, 20114We waited for and dreamed about this game for 15 years and all we got is a bunch of carp. Dated graphics, terrible voice-acting and a bad unfunny script. Thank a bunch gearbox!
-
Jun 16, 20111Man this game is BAD!
Horrible textures, cringe worthy dialog and terrible level design.
For a game in development for so long, one has to wonder just what they spent all that time on.
It certainly wasn't time well invested.
Not since the shocking Space Chimps Game has a title disgusted me so much! -
Jun 17, 20114
-
Jun 15, 20110
-
Jun 21, 20110
-
Jun 16, 20112
-
Jun 15, 20110I expected much more than a taped together game with all the bad features of old and new shooters. The game is heavily linear, features health regenerations, maximum of 2 weapons at a time, no secrets and boring turret sections (control turret to kill enemies).
-
Jun 21, 20113
-
Jun 20, 20110
-
Jul 3, 20111
-
Jul 13, 20123
-
Jun 14, 20113
-
Feb 1, 20121I got it for free, and I think I paid too much for it. The animation is terrible, the levels are tiny, mobs shoot through solid objects. It's almost as if they sat down and thought how can we make the worst game ever? And then they created it.
-
Oct 18, 20111Duke nukem is 15 hours and $10 of my life i wont get back . I feel like i just repurchased the orange box with a stripper pole on the cover . the graphics are not where they should be .some of the comedy is ok once but not twice actually have turned the volume off. the duke sold us out
-
Sep 11, 20111Simple. Use the games case as a paper-weight. Not an enjoyable experience at all. Buggy. Clunky. Linear. Just lame excuse for a Duke Nukem Game.
-
Jun 16, 20111Well, I was disappointed. 14 years in development and I get boring levels, poor AI, dated graphics (looks like its from 2002 or so) and nothing innovative... Even Duke's jokes are already heard and seen somewhere. I was shocked by clumsy NPC animations and lifeless surroundings. They needed more time I guess to finish this game. Score 2.0
-
Jun 14, 20111This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Jun 14, 20111
-
Jun 22, 20113
-
Jun 18, 20110Its rushed, crappy game of 2011. They abused the title and character to make some quick money and **** us off with crappy game. If they polished it and released maybe 5+ years ago, it would have been a decent game, but as of now its just rubbish. Totally not 2011 standards.
-
Aug 24, 20114
-
Oct 27, 20111Revised review. Even the fact that it's Duke can't save this game. This piece of history has been rendered worthless. But still, it's a piece of history. That's worth one point.
-
Jun 14, 20110
-
Jun 17, 20113
-
Aug 28, 20112
-
Jun 14, 20112roughly 14 years....really sad. i expected so much more. i should have known it the demo was really what it was going to be like. too bad Duke had to go down this way.
-
Jun 14, 20111
-
Jun 16, 20110I WANT MY MONEY BACK!!! This game is a total failure. ITS BORING, its slow, Duke is a cripple that can carry 2 weapons, and is blind after drinking one small beer. There is unlimited regenerating life (aka EGO), there are boring turret sections and car riding... THIS IS NOT DUKE. Seriously, skip it. Its not worth 10% of the price, it is so bad.
-
Jun 27, 20111What a bad return. Thin and boring level-design, no secrets or even secret-levels, snuffing babes instead rescuing babes, no more health. That's not Duke.
-
Jun 14, 20110
-
Jul 6, 20113
-
Jun 14, 20113
-
Jun 24, 20113
-
Jul 6, 20110+10 years in the making and the only thing the Developers think of doing are sexual and stereotypical portrayals of women. It feels like like thats the only thing the Developers really focused on to be honest. Since this game got a pretty big following I'm assuming the phrase 'sex sells' is in work here. Stay away from this game.
-
Jun 14, 20114
-
Jun 14, 20114
-
Jun 16, 20110Terrible game. Linear, bad graphics, stupid one liners peppered at random, and stupid boss fights makes me glad I did not buy this game. So sorry for all those saps who pre-ordered this pile of garbage.
-
Jun 14, 20111Duke Nukem Forever is a collection of minigames with short passages of regular FPS gaming. Even getting the game started takes 45 painfilled minutes while Duke admires himself, posters and signs autographs.
It's a bad game, don't buy it. -
Jun 14, 20112WOW...so disappointed in this game. Bad graphics, vulgar one liners trying to be funny but fall way short and linear game play. Wait for the bargain bin if you must have this for nostalgic reasons!
-
Jun 15, 20110It's bad, the end. Seriously, just head over to the official forums if you want reviews for the game. Duke Nukem Forever was a promising title that failed on many fronts, hyper-sexualization is the only thing that allowed this game to not drown in its own fail... and i would suspect that's the only reason the older Nukem crowd even played it.
-
Jun 14, 20110
-
Jun 14, 20112
-
Jun 15, 20114this game have humor and.......i cant of think anything else. This game is TOP 1 candidate on biggest disapointment of 2011. DONT BUY THIS, ITS WASTE OF MONEY better get drunk or buy your girlfriend something nice...
-
Jun 15, 20112
-
Jun 15, 20111
-
Jun 15, 20114
-
Jun 15, 20113
-
Jun 15, 20114Over a decade in development and it's full of JUMPING PUZZLES?! What were they thinking? This is not Duke, this is an awful POS console shooter. Junk. I'll go back to playing DN3D HRP before I play much more of this steaming pile.
-
Jun 16, 20114TenÃa claro que el juego no iba a dar más que lo que realmente ha dado. Es muy triste, pero hubiese preferido que nunca hubiese llegado y mantener el romanticismo por un Duke que nunca llegaba. Porque ahora que ha llegado, lo ha hecho asÃ... El gran Duke no se merecÃa esto.
-
Jun 16, 20111
-
Jun 17, 20111
-
Jun 18, 20112
-
Jun 19, 20110
-
Jun 19, 20113
-
Jul 7, 20114
-
Jul 31, 20110
-
Jun 23, 20110This game is just dumb. After all those years of waiting, 15 years or so? And this is all we get. I'll try to bring myself to begin describing how dumb and dumb and dumb this game is.
Iâ -
Jun 25, 20114An awful game. It's so bad, I gave up half-way through and deleted it. I loved playing the original Duke Nukem games in the 80's and 90's, but this new version disappoints. They keep saying this game took 12 years to release, and it shows. The graphics are dated and the game play is clunky and awkward. I wish I could get my money back!
-
Jul 2, 20113Don't waste your money, this game is seriously outdated, the game play is stodgy, the graphics are sub par, the maps are extremely boring, this game might have been cool if it was released 8 years ago, definitely a major step back compared to the original Duke Nukem, very disappointed.
-
Jul 6, 20114
-
Jul 3, 20114
-
Jul 4, 20113
-
Jul 4, 20111This game was obviously rushed out the door and lacks any kind of depth or attention to detail. The game is the living embodiment of linear and is 10 years behind the times as far as game play is concerned. It's one saving grace is the comedy but all the laughs in the world can't keep me awake while running through a hamster tube maze of boredom.
-
Jul 11, 20114The game has outdated graphics and gameplay mechanisms, and is extremely buggy, and is unable to support more then three enemies on a screen at a time. But the game does mix itself up by having severals interacting throughout it, but the puzzles get repetive and are fairly clich'e. But it's not the worst game, but is only good for rent, do not buy it.
-
Jul 17, 20111
-
Jul 20, 20113
-
Aug 13, 20111bad and dull game. glitchy. Don't buy it. This is just a money-making game of some very untalented and uninspired game developers. Rest in peace, duke. Rest in peace.
-
Nov 8, 20112
-
Sep 25, 20114
-
Oct 5, 20113Tried the demo, was desperately disappointed. It feels out of date, the movement is clunky and, while the humour is still there in spades, I feel Duke was a game of its time. It should have been left alone and we would have had fond memories.
-
Nov 23, 20120Really? We waited 20 something years for this steaming pile of code and graphics? What a way to totally destroy a franchise gifted to you. *golf claps*
-
Oct 12, 20112
-
Oct 22, 20113
-
Oct 20, 20111
-
Nov 2, 20112Played for about 20 minutes and stopped. Really not worth the money. HORRIBLE gameplay, graphics are average. Was hyped up way too much and just really failed to deliver on all areas. Give this a skip
-
Nov 6, 20113I'm a big fan of Duke3D,but this game.....Bad graphics,idiot story and characters,can't use all of the weapons(WTF!?),and I didn't feel that old,retro atmosphere.Multiplayer sucks,just sucks.The only thing which is not so bad is Duke's character,he is OK with his outdated one liners.Don't buy it,only cause pain.
-
Nov 8, 20110I would rather stare at a wall for a week than play this game for five min.
Dukes character sucks, horrible gameplay mechanics, PS2 graphics, console ported. Really after all these years this is the result?No need to write a review just don't buy it.
0 -
Jul 24, 20124
-
Nov 11, 20113This game was for me a very big letdown, expected more from the king of kings. The game is way to linear, even duke nukem 3d were less linear and often had more then one way to get to the end of the level and alot of fun to find secrets. If you havent played it yet but loved Duke nukem 3d my recomendation is dont play it, let the king live for every in your memory.
-
Mar 22, 20132Such a terrible game. There are so many wrongs with this game, i can't list them all. Read the other negative reviews and you'll get why this game is bad. The only time i remotely enjoyed myself was using the shotgun to blast piggies in the face, and even that happens rarely. Stay away from this, please.
-
Nov 21, 20114
-
Nov 29, 20114The gameplay is dull and the Storyline is cliché Although i find this game quite humorous from time to time if you have played it you tend to see that this game doesn't take itself too seriously but even then that does not make the game. I would only recommend that you get this game if its on some sale for Steam.
-
Dec 10, 20114
-
Dec 20, 20111level design is boring and generic,outdated graphics,game felt like it should have beeen realeased at least 5 or 6 years ago.generic multiplayer and only redeeming factos it is nasty humour!
-
Feb 9, 20123
-
Jan 23, 20121I really wanted to like this game really did but it was so bad. The jokes are mainly bad and graphics look like puke, weird to think same engine that did bioshock unreal 2.5. game play just sucks not even like duke nukem 3d which was great im not even going to give out multiple scores don't buy it you will waste you money and time.
-
May 27, 20120The most annoying game I've played for ten years. My rating: -10. Extremely annoying jump and run parts stopped me from playing the game to the finish.
-
Apr 2, 20121
-
Apr 16, 20121Wasted time...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
-
May 16, 20120Ugg mistakenly gave this thing a 10 out 10.. re-submitted.
This pos is so bad and is mostly just boring. I suppose this is the reason why G Broussard didn't get it out the door, even changing engines couldn't help this train wreck. All the negative reviews are true, avoid. -
Jun 4, 20122AN SERIOUS EPIC FAIL GAMEPLAY ..... ODD VISUALS..WEAK DRIVING MECHANICS AND SHOOTING AND EPIC!!.."FAILED" PLOT .. Sorry to say but ... "King just fail to impress baby"
-
May 29, 20121
-
Jun 5, 20121The humour was totally mis-judged, took what was a great aspect of the original 3d and totally blew it. The game itself was pretty "Meh", but I was cringing throughout at the unfunny jokes and the incredibly over-use of catchphrases. Killed what should have been ace, and certainly had all the hype and buildup of something worthwhile. Shame on the developers.
-
Jul 8, 20123
-
Oct 17, 20121I can't understand why Duke Nukem Forever received a score this high. The game is aweful is just playing like its full of **** in it. I DONT UNDERSTAND DARN YOU DUKE
-
Sep 28, 20124
-
Dec 19, 20123The game is not even comparable to Duke Nukem 3D. The game doesn't have action, or it has it in very little portions, because it's based on **** around.
-
Dec 30, 20122
-
Sep 12, 201155Duke Nukem Forever would be quite decent if one felt entirely certain it's intended purely as a self-parody. As is, it doesn't do the expectations, the buyer or the Duke justice – oh, had he rather remained a vaporware legend!
-
Aug 6, 201129Petty, nasty and anachronistic. Duke is only relevant as a warning from the past. Avoid these mistakes, developers. [Aug 2011, p.76]
-
Aug 1, 201172Bottom line: Duke Nukem Forever was not worth the 15-year wait, nor is it worth paying the full $50. However, I cannot deny that I thought it was both fun and funny, which at the end of the day is what this franchise is all about.