User Score
7.4
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 5 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 3 out of 5
-
Mixed: 1 out of 5
-
Negative: 1 out of 5
Review this game
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
AlanH.Feb 3, 200410Great
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 2, 200410Not bad
-
-
MormoMay 3, 20065goog graphics over all, but after a few hours becomes very repetitive, and boring, lack of history, does not aport anything new to FPS.
-
-
RaviV.Jun 17, 20048Superbly designed old-school shooter with a lot to recommend it: powerful engine, decent levels, a nice RPG element, and a breakneck pace. Not without some problems, such as mediocre models. Yet overall this is one of the few heirs to the original Quake that gets the mixture of speed, gunning and movement right. Budget priced, but delivers A-level value.
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
If you feel like a little frenetic shooting and don't really care if it makes any sort of cohesive sense, then you won't feel bad about picking up this title. [July 2004, p.67]
-
45It’s lost in its own story line. While there is a great story line, the gameplay revolves nothing around it. The only thing Firestarter has running for it is the graphics.
-
All the elements of a good shooter are here. Good graphics, good sound, good depth, bloody gameplay...it just doesn't add up. There's a stubborn sloppiness to the game that makes it tough to recommend.