Metascore
19 out of 100

Overwhelming dislike - based on 4 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 4
  2. Negative: 3 out of 4
  1. This shooter's imbecilic AI and laughable weapons-modelling all scream "rush job," through each of its nine sleep-inducing missions. [July 2003, p.75]
  2. Outdated graphics, bad sound, lousy control, horrible technical performance, nonfunctional computer AI, terrible weapons--the game has about every problem you could possibly think of. In fact, it's difficult to imagine that Gods and Generals could be much worse than it is.
  3. A nightmarish collection of bad ideas, bottom barrel production values, and exists only to steal $19.99 from the pockets of passionate Civil War fans that deserve better. [July 2003, p.86]
User Score

Generally unfavorable- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 13
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 13
  3. Negative: 11 out of 13
  1. 0
    This is absolutely the worst game I've ever played in my entire life, bad programming, bad AI, **** graphics, **** sound effects, in fact the entire game is just a waste of time, it's an insult to just call it a game, you'll probably have more fun playing with your fingers than dealing with this game, I bought this game for just one reason, to troll my friends who have not played this game yet. >:) Full Review »
  2. Razorbacks
    2
    It was a good idea, but bad graphics, and I kinda doubt a lone soldier can take out a whole army, and the graphics, they're just bad, the History Channel is making a Civil War game for the Xbox 360, I think its an FPS, but I'm not sure Full Review »
  3. ShlumGuy
    0
    No one wants to "just rip on the south" this game is so bad its unimaginable. Anyone who thinks this game is even somewhat good has a serious problem with being able to judge a good game from absolute horrendous crap. Full Review »