1. RyanI.

   10

   Although I picked up Warcraft 3 came out in 2002, It is still the game I play most, and it has a lot of competition. I play Call of Duty 4, World of Warcraft, Half Life 2 and its various mods, and many others. Even with all these games I have played Warcraft 3 the most, simply from its huge replay value and epic storyline. The game's single player it huge and varied. No two missions are alike. Even if you dislike standard Warcraft 3 combat, run on over to battle.net! The multiplayer has a huge amount of player made maps, things that range from games that are alterations of normal Warcraft 3 base building and fighting, to 3rd person shooters like Elimination Tournament. Some people dislike the game, thinking that the battles are to small, and your largest army is around 18 people. But trust me, with every unit being unique, and when maps can be up to 6 v 6, the battles are huge, and you have to manage many differant units making it a long, intense battle. One of the best games of all time.… Expand

   • Helpful?

     5 of 5 users said yes
2. SimonB.

   6

   Hey there, hey there. RTS? RPG? MMORPG? Got milk? No seriously, Warcraft 2 was a game I played a lot in my childhood. It was always the second choice after Doom (1,2,ultimate). After a while, I realised Warcraft 2 was getting dull and empty. Like beating a can with a stick. All I found really worthwhile were the sounds. "DA'BURR!" Y'know? Wacraft 3... Well, it's the sequel, with revamped graphics, new engine, new everything, really. The game's pretty, let's admit that. The characters look cartoonish and they have always looked that way in the Warcraft series. Removing the ultra-pwnage of getting the biggest and baddest creatures in the game to win it all, WC3 forces you to use heroes. Rather than spam your mines with 20 peasants, you can just use a few in other races. The whole story kind of goes "PFOOT!" after a while. Everything goes predictable in a LOTR kind of way. Multiplayer? I'll admit, I'm more of a single-player person for those games. But on multi-player, I found the same recipee as for all the other Blizzard games. You know specific strategies for each race, you win it all. There isn't much room for innovation, because everyone has done it. Trying to stray from the main track gets you losses. How fun?… Expand

   • Helpful?

     1 of 6 users said yes
3. CodyK.

   4

   I loved Warcraft II, but couldn’t bring myself to appreciate this title. The new 3D graphics are great, but I have a feeling that the developers started out on a different foot and ended up caving into the success of the franchise… and, essentially, recreated what was done before. The thing that appealed to me most was the RPG aspect… you can collect items and power up your characters. How cool is that? Very… and then you reach a story arc after playing, for God knows how many hours, only to have your main character stripped of all his XP and items as you embark on another storyline and have to repeat the process again through countless levels. That’s the point when I stopped playing. That was the poorest decision Blizzard made in the entire game… or up until that point, because I never bothered continuing on after that.… Expand

   • Helpful?

     1 of 3 users said yes

See all 77 User Reviews