X-Men: The Official Game PC

Metascore
52

Mixed or average reviews - based on 28 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 28
  2. Negative: 11 out of 28
Buy On
  1. PC Gamer UK
    49
    Lots of swearing as you protect a world that hates and fears you. [Aug 2006, p.85]
  2. PC Format
    48
    A solo Nightcrawler game could rock, but this team effort is cash-in gibberish. [July 2006, p.100]
  3. Like many games of this style, there is some vague, half-guilty pleasure in the mechanical repetitiveness of the game's combat. But ultimately, X-Men is in the time-honored tradition of licensed games -- rushed, derivative, and well worth avoiding.
  4. PC Gamer
    40
    I need Professor X to wipe the memory of this game from my brain. [Aug 2006, p.85]
  5. As it is, X-Men: The Official Game is “officially” a horse’s turd of an experience that’s approximately as painful as Wolverine’s claws inadvertently sliding out while he’s wiping his arse.
  6. Play Magazine
    35
    X-Men: The Official Game is pretty awful. [July 2006, p.71]
  7. The idea of giving the player three fairly unique characters to play as is good one, but the game design verges on plain stupid at times.
  8. Edge Magazine
    30
    Had The Official Game provided a consistent overall challenge, it would have been bearable, if unexciting. But it hasn’t, and it isn’t. [July 2006, p.88]
  9. games(TM)
    30
    When accurately describing videogames, we tend to use the word ‘dross’ rarely, but this particular X-Men title has forced the word from us in a spectacular fashion. [July 2006, p.130]
  10. Almost everything about this movie cash-in is cheap and incompetent, from the short, forgettable levels to the poor control system to the hand-crampingly repetitive action.
  11. Computer Games Magazine
    20
    There's virtually no effort made to adapt the controls to a PC, so make sure you've got a gamepad handy. Although the far better alternative is to just have a better game handy. [Oct. 2006, p.75]
User Score
6.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 18 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 1
  2. Negative: 0 out of 1
  1. Feb 2, 2015
    6
    Well, this could have been a lot better. I guess the story is good, but the controls are weird and the camera is terrible. The worst here isWell, this could have been a lot better. I guess the story is good, but the controls are weird and the camera is terrible. The worst here is how rushed the game is. Nonetheless, the upgrading battle features are really cool, and the fact that you can play as 3 different characters pretty much saves the game. Full Review »