Conflict: Global Terror Image

Mixed or average reviews - based on 15 Critics What's this?

User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 10 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Summary: (Also know as "Conflict: Global Storm") Bradley, Jones, Connors and Foley. The original heroes of "Conflict: Desert Storm" are back, this time having undergone intense training in counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency techniques, all added to their wealth of extensive battlefield and special ops experience. In ensuring the safety of the team Foley goes MIA and the team must enlist the help of sniper Carrie Sherman. As the missions become more deadly and the team start to uncover more of March 33’s plans, its clear they face the greatest challenge of their careers to date. [SCi Games] Collapse
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 15
  2. Negative: 1 out of 15
  1. One thing that doesn't feel realistic about this game is the incredible odds your team will face. [Dec 2005, p.102]
  2. The unnecessary complications lie in the sheer volume of convoluted commands crammed onto the DualShock for use throughout the game.
  3. Global Storm feels like the true heir to the Conflict: Desert Storm games in more than just surname, and remains a worthy war effort, despite there being other games that may do it grander or deeper. [Nov 2005, p.102]
  4. 60
    For a budget-oriented game, it offers plenty of shooting gallery fun and big explosions, and the missions are pretty long. But in the end, the relatively rudimentary AI made me wistful for "SWAT" and "Hidden & Dangerous."
  5. Tedious and tiresome at times. With a poor AI controlling your team mates, unspectacular graphics and sound, awkward controls and nothing new to add to the genre as a whole, it simply has not impressed me.
  6. This squad-based shooter badly needed something extra to set it apart from the others, as it falls off the mark due to complicated controls and terrible AI.
  7. 30
    The game's abysmal controls and moronic A.I. fail to deliver.

See all 15 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 5
  3. Negative: 1 out of 5
  1. CarrieS.
    Feb 6, 2006
    I have been addicted to this game ever since i got it, i even bunk work just to play multiplayer with my mates.
  2. TimO.
    Sep 16, 2005
    Great return to form for the series how come there isn't any reviews yet it s been out for nearly 2 weeks?
  3. JohnM.
    Nov 28, 2005
    Better than any of the overrated SOCOM games IMO. Looks much better as well, very nice to see some decent textures in a PS2 game for a change. Controls are no better or worse than other games of this type on consoles, which is to say they should be much better. As always, mouse/kb support would only make sense. There has been absolutely no excuse not to implement support in every PS2 FPS/3rdPS, at least allowing those who appreciate logical controls to use them. And finally, if framerates were considered all that important, 80% of PS2 games would receive below average reviews. At least out of the 300 or so games I've played. You can't blame developers for hardware that was lacking in video RAM (or even texture compression capability which was ancient tech at the time) to such a ludicrous degree from the outset. Expand
  4. May 21, 2011
    just as its prequels nothing but good to say this game provides a satisfactory story as well as a variety of equipment and missions to keep players going Expand
  5. ZachM.
    Nov 9, 2005
    This game is not worth even 10 bucks. I have played the conflict series from the first desert storm. I have always enjoyed them but hated that every time i played for over an hour the crappy framerates and graphics gave me a headache. I hoped that in Global Terror this would finally end, but much to my regret it seemed worse at times. And to top it all off the A.I. was horrible. Expand