Metascore
62

Mixed or average reviews - based on 16 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 16
  2. Negative: 1 out of 16
  1. Apr 24, 2013
    40
    Even though Sacred Citadel isn't an offensively bad game by any stretch, I find it hard to say anything positive about it. Sure, it can be pretty, isn't frustrating and works on a base level. But that's about it. Every mechanic is half-baked and heedlessly thrown in.
User Score
6.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 11 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 0 out of 2
  1. Jun 25, 2013
    10
    While the critics make this game seem mediocre (and I respect it, they are pretty trust-worthy websites), it is actually very good, especiallyWhile the critics make this game seem mediocre (and I respect it, they are pretty trust-worthy websites), it is actually very good, especially if you're into 2D platformers with epic biblical proportions. Full Review »
  2. Apr 30, 2013
    7
    The game is cool, though I don't think it's worth 15 dollars. It plays like old school brawlers (like Golden Axe) where a group of a Warrior,The game is cool, though I don't think it's worth 15 dollars. It plays like old school brawlers (like Golden Axe) where a group of a Warrior, a Mage, an Archer and a Shaman fight to overthrow a dark power in the realm. I just don't get it why there are 4 available characters but co-op is only available for 3 players? Doesn't make any sense. And talking about co-op... try to create an online public session; it appears that no one is playing the game!! So best choice for co-op is the old, traditional couch co-op. Or playing solo (which is much less fun). That being said, this is a nice game. Plays nicely, has nice graphics and overall feel, but nothing more than that. But it does serve as a cool warm up for the upcoming D&D brawlers and Dragon Crown. Full Review »