- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
Easy to manage hot keys, intuitive controls, a great map that doubles as an objective outline...everything here is spot on. [Apr 2008, p.55]
-
85A well-rounded action title with elements of strategy, traditional hack and slash, and arcade action.
-
80It feels disappointing at first, but it quickly moves beyond that and turns into a game that, despite its shortcomings, is just plain fun.
-
80Viking: Battle for Asgard is a very nice hack-and-slash game. It's really not difficult to play and is still very enyoable. The huge battles with thousands of soldiers really makes the game supurb.
-
80It's a game that's far better than most of the tat on the shelves just now, and certainly deserving of your attention and we reckon that a sequel could be stunning.
-
In spite of its somewhat repetitive rhythm, Viking manages to offer to the player a great sense of accomplishment. It keeps us moving forward with the promise (always fulfilled) of some epic action sequences. The combat system is the result of a well balanced act between depth and accessibility. [Apr 2008]
-
80Visceral combat and fort assaults are the main attractions, although the story isn't exactly alluring.
-
This game left you wanting a little more in certain areas but for the overall feel of the game this was wonderfully put together. You have a great story that really flows and pulls you into it.
-
Viking: Battle of Asgard is a great game for what it wants to accomplish.
-
75The combat may be shallow, the story non-existent and the fetch quests tedious, but I still managed to have a blast with Sega's latest offering.
-
74Viking is enjoyable, but not long lasting. [Issue#165, p.82]
-
A solid rental if you like bloody action games.
-
73The vicious combat is a lot of fun, and building your army and laying siege to the enemy is a compelling experience in an action game setting. If it didn't run out of ideas so quickly and had a smoother presentation, Viking could have struck an even mightier blow.
-
An extremely uncomplicated title that has its fair share of fun due to the hilariously brutal combat animations.
-
72The game is flawed and introduces nothing new to the genre but the outcome is pleasant and worthy of your playtime.
-
70As entertaining as the game is, it's abundantly clear that things could have been a whole lot better.
-
70At some point, you realize that looking back at each of Viking's qualities, it's hard to really put your finger on anything that's truly standout -- and yet it's compelling.
-
70Viking: Battle for Asgard is beautiful as far as offering a hurricane of blood and gore can be beautiful, but it's easy to get bogged down in the repetitive combat.
-
Viking is a weekend of relaxing ultraviolence, giving Xbox owners an easy thousand points to chase and PS3 owners a short, sweet adventure to pad their shelf.
-
65Sadly, Viking is one of those games that could have been great but thanks to repetitive hack-and-slash gameplay there is really not much here even Odin would approve.
-
For a game that promised so much, Viking really doesn't do much in the way of delivering.
-
65Viking: Battle of Asgard is a passable hack-and-slash that would have left a stronger impression if the style managed to outdo the substance.
-
Tries too hard to ape other, similar games without following its own path. Shame. [May 2008, p.62]
-
63The battles stumble thanks to chug, the worlds get repetitive, and when you're not really interested in the story or your ultimate goal, hack-and-slash gets on your nerves no matter how many times you cut a guy in two.
-
The only good thing to say about the scrapping is the quality of the gore. [May 2008, p.102]
-
60Viking's a decent game, thanks to over the top combat moves and a sprawling fantasy world, but its lack of drama and a few design issues make it inferior to Sony's exquisite "God of War" franchise.
-
Combat is gory, but the mechanics are weak. [May 2008, p.104]
-
While Viking isn't a total disappointment, the biggest problem here is a matter of the game feeling wholly and entirely unfinished.
-
It doesn't have a multiplayer mode and the audio is only average, but Viking: Battle for Asgard executes what it set out to achieve - fun and addictive gameplay, even if short-lived.
-
The final showdown with Hel - and the story's resolution - seems abrupt and sadly, unepic. [June 2008, p.82]
-
Ultimately Viking: Battle for Asgard is almost a complete waste of Norse mythology. It's bloody and epic, but the boring, repetitive combat and hours you spend doing un-Vikingly menial tasks leaves a sour taste in the mouth, washed down with a swig of bitter, pointless stealth idiocy.
-
52With so many problems, unbalanced combat, and no multiplayer, it is hard to recommend anyone to buy this game, let alone rent it. Give it a try if you are a fan of the subject matter, if not, there are plenty of better action titles out there for you to enjoy instead.
-
Viking is sadly, a massively missed opportunity that's dragged into the depths of mediocrity by a boring story, an uninteresting hero, repetitive missions, endless wandering around, hit-and-miss sound, disappointing battles and lots of slowdown.
-
50Thanks to Viking: Battle for Asgard's mundane and tedious gameplay, the only battle you'll wage will be a losing one against boredom.
-
Viking simply doesn't do enough to stand up to the more polished action experiences out there. [June 2008, p.86]
-
Viking, once it is all said and done, just isn't a very good game. It's repetitive, its boring and nearly every aspect of the game seems either rushed or plain forgotten about.
-
40Unfortunately there is so much wrong with it that it doesn't even manage to reach average status.
-
33Viking: Battle for Asgard falls far short of its potential.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 3 out of 4
-
Mixed: 0 out of 4
-
Negative: 1 out of 4
-
CalsonC.8
-
BrandonT8