Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Tomb Raider: Anniversary PSP
Tomb Raider: Anniversary Image
Metascore
78 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 32 Critics What's this?

User Score
9.3 out of 10

Universal acclaim- based on 9 Ratings

Your Score
10 out of 10
Rate this:
  • Summary: Inspired by the first Tomb Raider videogame, originally released in 1996, Lara Croft Tomb Raider: Anniversary is a totally new 2006 adventure for Lara, faithfully preserving the elements which made the original Tomb Raider such a classic. Using an enhanced "Tomb Raider Legend" game engine, the graphics, technology and physics bring Lara's adventure and pursuit of a mystical artefact known only as the Scion up to today’s technology standards and offer gamers a completely new gameplay experience. The puzzles are now more in depth and incorporate environmental interaction and physics driven solutions. The level design and flow of gameplay are inspired by the original videogame making Lara Croft Tomb Raider: Anniversary a brand new experience in gaming, while still invoking the nostalgia of the first adventure in Tomb Raiding. [Eidos Interactive]… Expand

Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 26 out of 32
  2. Mixed: 6 out of 32
  3. Negative: 0 out of 32
  1. Cheat Code Central
    88
    It's nice to relive the past, but it's a lot nicer when you discover that things are even better than you thought they were.
  2. Game Chronicles
    88
    It's a timeless experience for the entire family.
  3. Boomtown
    70
    A damn good remake of a damn good game.

See all 32 Critic Reviews

User Reviews

Write a Review
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 1
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 1
  3. Negative: 0 out of 1
  1. Igonge
    10
    We all know that Tomb Raider Legend on PSP was a disaster. However, Anniversary vastly improves upon the previous instalment's bad controls, bad camera and low framerate. This version is just as brilliant as the other versions. Nice graphics and gameplay make for and enjoyable playthrough.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes