- Studio: Fox 2000 Pictures
- Release Date: Jan 18, 2008
User Score
5.8
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 88 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 53 out of 88
-
Mixed: 16 out of 88
-
Negative: 19 out of 88
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Dec 21, 20125This is not a bad movie. However, it's not the best either. Chalk full of cliches, old-time metaphors, and the feeling that this sort of movie has been filmed before; it's not all bad. There is laugh to be heard here and there. It was disapointing.
-
Jan 11, 20124It was OK. I didn't like it much but I can't bring myself to hate it. I will say this: There is nothing new in this movie. Well, except for the fact that this is the first movie I've seen where James Marsden gets the girl in the end. That was it.
-
Dec 31, 20111Katherine Heigl gives a very impressive and funny performance, but sadly it is a romantic comedy and they usually fall for the basic formula and you know everything that is going to happen and it soon becomes boring. I give this movie 15%.
-
Nov 26, 20113
-
Aug 8, 20117Despite the cliche and ridiculous. But somehow it works for me. At least entertaining. Good chemistry from Katherine Heigl and James Marsden. It tell us, the world don't suck up, there's still something call love.
-
Aug 1, 20111This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Nov 24, 201010very emotional, cry a lot, and katherine is great. it was predicted as all romantic movies, but it is unique, in dialogue and direction.
I love it! -
magnesiumgJan 27, 20094
-
-
LaurensJan 20, 20096It's a cute enough movie to watch every now and then. It wasn't superb, it wasn't terrific, but it wasn't horrible. All in all, it is generally a movie with mixed emotions, but with cute scenes. It's good, but comedy is also limited.
-
-
EcG.Nov 29, 20082Challenges "The Notebook" for all-time worst movie. The film equivalent of watching Britney Spears manager her life; which is to say, a train wreck. Like a burning accident, however, I watched it till the end.
-
-
MorganF.Aug 2, 20086Predictable, but surprisingly funny. Used nearly cliche in the book. The end really made me mad though.
-
-
SteveT.Jun 16, 200810
-
-
MegGMay 17, 20080
-
-
CarolH.May 7, 20084Heigl is not believable as the lonely single girl pining away for her oblivious boss--she's way too attractive! Her monstrous sister suddenly turning into the model of common sense at the end completely turned me off and ruined what little ending there was. Can chick flicks not insult our intelligence???
-
-
PhoebeMay 7, 20088Light.
-
-
JayH.Apr 16, 20087I enjoyed the film tremendously. The performances by Katherine Heigl and Judy Greer are wonderful. Funny, touching and very entertaining. Ok, it is predictable, but it works.
-
-
MonoApeApr 3, 20080Utterly predictable. Cringingly not funny. Uses every cliché known to lazy scriptwriters. I'm sure I came out more stupid than I went in.
-
-
KayleighmsMar 28, 20085With little imagination (think
-
-
RachelF.Mar 15, 20086The movie was average, neither good nor bad. I enjoyed Katherine Heigl's acting. I predict that she will soon join other actresses such as Reese Witherspoon as America's Sweethearts. Although both Heigl and co-star James Marden were enjoyable, I felt that this movie was too predictable. Everything happened just as one would have suspected. Loved the stars, not so much the plotline.
-
-
StefanD.Feb 25, 200810This was the perfect date movie for us. Her situation was was but the expressive acting (e.g. stuffing her mouth full of food, his facial expressions) were just what we needed. It was humorous and engaging with plot twists to boot. It also didn't have overflowing sexuality which was refreshing.
-
-
MichaelM.Feb 19, 20084Cliche and passable at best. It's everything you would expect (or feared). A giggle or two can be found, but outside of that, hardly worth the price of admission.
-
-
MarcS.Feb 19, 20082The first 10 minutes are funny, the rest of the two hours are just plain boring. I have never walked out of a movie, however, this one came really close. Save 10 bucks and watch another movie. Your date will be falling asleep before the movie ends.
-
-
LuisG.Feb 18, 20086Heigl is for me the closest thing to Julia Roberts since Reese Witherspoon ala sweet home Alabama. Heigl makes an honest impression on you but unlike many other actresses shes not forgettable hope to her blossom with grace... Marsden is lone overdue for a leading role a shame his role was sort of bland.
-
-
MSALFeb 18, 20083My gf is a real romantic comedy buff and she even said it was lame. The movie is just too long for such a predictable plot, weird characters that don't belong, and slow to get to the point. Also, much less funnier than the trailer. Trust me , don't waste you cash, I did.
-
-
JessicaR.Feb 18, 20088I loved this movie, predictable but a true funny, warm and adorable chick flick.
-
-
RafiG.Feb 15, 20088Me and my wife saw it for valentines. Overall we really enjoyed the movie. Acting was decent and charming. There were some interesting characters. I found Jane's friend, Judy Greer, made the movie for me.
-
-
StephanieCFeb 8, 20088I saw this with my friend, and we enjoyed it quite a lot. Yes, it's predictable because it is a romantic comedy. But let me say this, it was not as cheesy or stupid as it could have been. It felt semi-realistic. And more importantly, it made me laugh. Oh yea, and we were glad she ended up with the much cuter journalist.
-
-
JudithFeb 5, 20088I thought it was tremendous fun.
-
-
ClaireFFeb 4, 20088
-
-
MeghanC.Feb 4, 20089Ok so I loved this movies so much. i got hooked in the begging and loved it. the sex content was a little bad but did not take away from the movie.
-
-
SH.Feb 2, 20088Went to see it with my girlfriends. I laughed quite a bit. Predictable yes but much funnier than I anticipated. Well worth $8.50 was the general consensus of 6 thirtysomething former bridesmaids.
-
-
JeffS.Jan 31, 20086A middle-of-the-road romantic comedy for me, though my wife enjoyed it considerably more. Acting wasn't bad, but the attempts at humor didn't resonate with me. Again, though, my wife (and a female friend) both found this movie quite funny. It was worth the time and money, but it's not near my favorite romantic comedy.
-
-
TaylorCJan 30, 20086
-
-
SharryT.Jan 28, 20087I thought this was a lot better than many romantic comedies. The acting was perfectly decent and the plot fair. Way better than the Wedding Crashers which got better reviews.
-
-
AdrianL.Jan 23, 200810Of course it was predictable, it's a romantic comedy. It was one of the best written in the genre that I've seen in years.
-
-
CW.Jan 20, 20087Follows a tried and true romantic comedy formula, but has enough realism and decent acting to keep it going. The audience seemed to laugh in all the right places, and everyone walked away with a smile. Can't ask much more than that these days.
-
-
ChadS.Jan 20, 20087
-
-
DeniseG.Jan 16, 20082What a waste of time! Implausible plot, ridiculous dialogue, and not a single relationship that rings true. Knocked Up this ain't.
-
-
50While Heigl is terrific, this uninspired romantic comedy is considerably less so.
-
70Frothy, funny and formulaic, 27 Dresses is a pleasantly predictable romantic comedy that sees Katherine Heigl following “Knocked Up” with smooth moves at the wheel of her first starring vehicle.
-
63There's not a surprising moment in the movie yet it works in spite of the stale, insipid storyline. That has a lot to do with lead actress Katherine Heigl and a little to do with the glowing embers between her and her co-star, James Marsden.