- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Jun 23, 1989
User Score
7.9
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 101 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 90 out of 101
-
Mixed: 4 out of 101
-
Negative: 7 out of 101
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Sep 18, 20119What makes "Batman" impressive is the unpredictable creativity and live art director Tim Burton mixes in with the original idea. Very impressive and well made.
-
Oct 30, 201010best Michael Keaton movie ever!
-
Feb 1, 20114Perhaps it is because I saw the Nolan films first but I was unimpressed with the lack of plot and the mix and match thing they've got going on with the set. Keaton was decent and Nicholson a redeemer, but I maintain there was a negligible storyline and the poor pacing results in a film that is not engaging.
-
Apr 1, 20119
-
Jan 22, 20120
-
DeepakG.Apr 5, 200710Definitely one of the best looking action films of ALL time. Tim burton is god.
-
-
UterJun 15, 20038It's probably the best action hero movie ever made.
-
-
MaxP.Nov 10, 200410I've always loved batman, so i love the film. Keaton and Nicholson make this film a winner. one of my favourite films instantly!!!
-
-
PatC.Jan 10, 20042It's always o'dark 30 in Gotham. Even the original comics were better lit. Once again Hollywood takes a super hero and renders him into neither.
-
-
SamOct 7, 200510
-
-
GlennM.Jul 1, 20051I cant believe this movie even got decent reviews. It dragged on with a very dense and pointless plot and thats only the start. This had the worst filmed fight sequences ive ever seen. It made me nautious.
-
-
HenryT.Dec 30, 200710I love this film best batman film ever the joker's great and batman's great I don't like the new Dark knight film the joker looks terrible.
-
-
DavidHJan 24, 20076Decent, but it never quite comes together. Kim Basinger has no screen chemistry with Keaton, while the character arc is oversimplified by turning the Joker into a psychopath and while the visuals are impressive, they're not groundbreaking. Both of these points would be improved upon in Batman Returns.
-
-
RirenJan 30, 20074
-
-
H.IdentityApr 23, 200710This movie was probably the best superhero movie I've seen. Michael Keaton made the character of Batman a dark and menacing figure of the night which made him my favorite Batman of all time. And Jack Nicolson's portrayal of the Joker was creepy yet genius. I loved the movie all around.
-
-
[Anonymous]Sep 22, 20078First Batman doesn't have the personal moral resonance and depth of Batman begins. However, this films got another card to play...the brilliant Jack Nicholson cranks out the ultimate joker.
-
-
ShockJul 8, 200810This film and Batman Returns are the only films to actually explore the psychology of Batman. It doesn't rely on cliche characterization of the title character or heavy handed moralizing either - just a dark and brooding Batman.
-
-
JeremyOct 16, 20039Still the best comic book ever made, one that values its villian as much as its hero, its story and characters as much as its action, and some of the best production design of recent years thrown in.
-
-
TeresaC.Mar 7, 20038Michael Keaton is the best Batman, and the first two movies are the best in the series--the special effects fit the dark atmosphere of the film without blitzing the audience to death the way, say, Batman & Robin does.
-
-
raVenJun 16, 20047A seven, sure. But it's still the worst baseball movie I've ever seen.
-
-
PaulMJul 19, 200410Whoa!!! A 59??? I was expecting a 88 or something...This movie is nothing less than a classic, and the sequel is even better! The last two batmans were so bad it wasnt even funny...But ne ways, this is a must-see.
-
-
SamS.Oct 20, 200510A masterpiece. It makes every other bat film that has come since then (with the exception of Burton's HIGHLY under rated Batman Returns) look sub-standered.
-
-
CraiganU.Jul 28, 20053I love Batman and I love Tim Burton...and seeing this as an 8th grader, thought it was a groovey breath of fresh comic-adaptation air, but this dark movie has not stood the test of time. It's dark, brooding, and boring with Dark Knight/Bruce Wayne taking a back seat to a cool Danny Elfman soundtrack and focus on a 1980's futuro-Gotham.
-
-
VikramM.Aug 11, 200510This movie can be called a superhero classic. This and the original Superman dominate all of the superhero movies. This is arguably the best Keaton and Nicholson role ever. There chemistry as hero and villain is amazaing. So sit back and watch Batman do a little fighting and see Nicholson say one of the greatest lines ever, "He stole my balloons!"
-
-
Myles#13Sep 6, 200610This is the superhero movie of our day and defined the genre. Burton delivered the Batman that Bob Kane envisioned when he first developed the character. Don't listen to the doubters... Michael Keaton IS Batman and Jack Nicholson IS the Joker- both actors are at the top of their game in this film.
-
-
JaredB.Sep 25, 200710
-
-
MichaelJul 16, 200810The best (numero uno) superhero movie of all time. Mops the floor with Batman Begins a thousand times over. Will never be topped.
-
-
RickFAug 4, 200810The only film to still capture every essence of my imagination.
-
-
SimonD.Jun 26, 20038
-
-
YoonC.Sep 14, 20033Heavy handed and cumbersome, about as fun as watching the logistics of modern war operations. Batman is a stiff, rigid, rubbersuited hero and the Batmobile has about as much glamour as a Soviet tank. Nicholson hams it up ugly with zero charm. Burton goes for schlock Wagnerianism about as inspired as Nazi aesethetics. Gothic gigantism with not an inkling of lighthearted fun.
-
-
JeffM.Nov 23, 200410BATMAN RULES!!
-
-
FredB.Oct 21, 20068This movie, for being so old, is nicely done. The cast of Keaton, Nicholson, and Basinger really bring the movie to life.
-
-
LukeTJul 18, 20079
-
-
FNov 16, 200410Simply the best superhero movie ever seen nothing else come close.
-
-
Aug 11, 20108Not as good as Batman Begins, but a pretty great movie nonetheless. However, if Nicholson weren't there to steal the show from Keaton's dull Bruce Wayne, I would probably have given it a lower score.
-
Feb 6, 201110I watched this movie a couple of days ago after so many years and while Batman's stiffness in his movements kind of gets in the way, the movie is still as spectacular as ever, specially the musical score.
-
Feb 14, 20119The only flaw I can find with this movie is Micheal Keaton, his interpretation of Batman is poorly done, but Jack Nicholson's performance as The Joker easily makes up for this, he really shows the Joker for who he is, a psychotic prankster, all in all if you can put up with Keaton than you have yourself a great movie.
-
Feb 27, 20129
-
Aug 28, 20117
-
Aug 30, 20119Batman is a Dark Film with great action sequences and good all around acting performances from Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson its a Classic Movie that will be marked in history as one of the most memorable Super Hero movies of All time
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
60Despite its interesting, grim tone and undeniably striking visuals from director Burton and production designer Furst, the film fails to synthesize its strengths into a compelling whole.
-
50The movie's problem is that no one seemed to have any fun making it, and it's hard to have much fun watching it. It's a depressing experience.
-
63It would be a lot better if it didn't lean exclusively on bone-crunching action for its climactic thrills, and the story continues long after its ideas have started to sag. [29 June 1989, Arts, p.10]