Metascore
49 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 29 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 29
  2. Negative: 5 out of 29
  1. Its real agenda is rip-roaring adventure, and that it delivers all wrapped up with a bow.
  2. 80
    War is hellishly entertaining, especially in Behind Enemy Lines, a 21-gun salute to the commitment and preparedness of the U.S. military.
  3. Simplistic and jingoistic. But it's also explosively fun.
  4. It's plenty thrilling, and it appeals to the flag-waving patriot in all of us.
  5. As intense an immersion in military ambience as a Hollywood movie could hope to provide in just over 90 minutes.
  6. Reviewed by: Richard Schickel
    70
    The journey is never boring, and it's morally satisfying too. O.K., the movie is what Hollywood likes to call "a ride." But it's one worth taking.
  7. A Hollywood production that appeals to our patriotism while respecting our intelligence.
  8. 67
    Although at times ridiculous, Behind Enemy Lines nevertheless thrills, inspires.
  9. 63
    The conflict (in Afghanistan) makes this updated Rambo-esque thriller seem at once dated and yet relevant in ways its creators could not have envisioned.
  10. 63
    A slickly entertaining war movie that's sometimes striking, sometimes silly -- but never, ever boring.
  11. As a director, Moore is like an energetic puppy who's all over you all at once. You admire his energy, and it's awfully hard to get angry at such high spirits, but you can't help but wish he'd calm down just a bit.
  12. Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    60
    An unembarrassed, high-octane demonstration of the virtues of a U.S. military with a mission, the latest war pic from 20th Century Fox -- a studio with a proud tradition in this field -- couldn't be better timed to fit the popular mood.
  13. The script's labored efforts to push the proceedings into a thought-provoking military drama -- and draw some clear moral issue -- are, at best, flimsy.
  14. A pumped-up, flag-waving, outrageously hokey and ridiculous -- but sometimes incredibly exciting -- war movie.
  15. There aren't many better examples of how commercial intuition sabotages story integrity in today's Hollywood.
  16. Reviewed by: Mike Clark
    50
    There's nothing very rockin' about seeing Gene Hackman give a rare indifferent performance as a Navy admiral trying to effect a rescue for which his hands are tied.
  17. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    50
    As it is, Behind Enemy Lines will satisfy only those in search of a rousingly, if simplistically, patriotic bloodbath.
  18. 50
    You get the feeling the filmmakers didn't want to make anyone think too hard about what's going on here behind the scenes of the main storyline, and that's more than a little insulting.
  19. 50
    Sometimes stylish flashiness can be fun, and the movie does have a terrific, bleached-out, ice-blue look. But anyone who cares about what actors do has a right to be distrustful of a director who puts more emphasis on the look of his movie than on the performances.
  20. 50
    Though Wilson gives a customarily sympathetic, engaged, and unpredictable performance, his work is drowned out by pyrotechnics and orchestral paroxysms of patriotism.
  21. The film desperately wants to play like "Three Kings," a war film with a guilty conscience, but it's too pat and familiar to earn its high-minded stripes.
  22. We, the people, are meant to cheer in response, but the spirit isn't willing. War is hell, but so is peace -- at least when it comes to movies in a no-man's-land like this one.
  23. 40
    The film's flashy visuals (apparently geared to engaging video game-impaired attention spans) are entertaining, but its cynicism is distasteful.
  24. 40
    A slag heap of outrageous coincidence and shimmering be-all-that-you-can-be posturing, the film is for all intents and purposes another Top Gun retread, which is why its lies don't register as deeply or offensively as those put forth by films like "Mississippi Burning" -- it's too silly to take seriously.
  25. 38
    This is not the story of a fugitive trying to sneak through enemy terrain and be rescued, but of a movie character magically transported from one photo opportunity to another.
  26. A mediocrity at any time, because of its implausible script and bland characters.
  27. 30
    The end justifies the means as long as everything turns out OK for the not-too-obedient American soldier and everyone else who enjoys Coca-Cola.
  28. Behind Enemy Lines has a wretched script and a director (first-timer John Moore) who either has no taste or doesn't know what he's doing.
  29. Reviewed by: Gareth Von Kallenbach
    20
    Sadly, it seems that the people behind this film saw a quick buck over quality and gave audiences a turkey.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 45 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 21
  2. Negative: 4 out of 21
  1. Even though I don't consider Owen Wilson an action nor dramatic actor I believe this is his best job as of yet. Of course the movie has Gene Hackman in it, but the director manages to make you focus on Wilson. Great action scenes with very realistic effects and a good story. But overall it's just another action movie. Full Review »
  2. JaredC.
    7
    Finally a follow-up to Saving Private Ryan, its a war movie that doesn't have the guts, it has actual American-can-do spirit in it. It may be a very short movie dissapointingly but it is crafted in a way Saving Private Ryan wasn't. Full Review »
  3. DK
    8
    Some great action sequences and two strong central performances make this a superior blockbuster. John Moores direction is perfectly suited for this sort of fair and the critical reaction of 49 really is a bit shocking. Full Review »