- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Mar 30, 2012
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
80Leaner, meaner, and far superior to 2010's Clash cock-up. From top-grade 3D to a multitude of monsters and a welcome influx of acting talent, this is pure popcorn pleasure.
-
70An improvement. Not a gigantic leap forward for cinema but, armed with a new director, a new story and the return of a trying-harder Worthington and good ol' Liam Neeson as a put-upon Zeus, a marked upgrade in quality.
-
67An imagined conversation between Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes, after the premiere of Wrath of the Titans...
-
67For a movie like Wrath of the Titans, which is basically "Gladiator" crossed with "Lord of the Rings" crossed with a special-effects demo reel (call it Lord of the Rinky-Dink), he's (Worthington) the perfect actor.
-
60Wrath of the Titans, like its predecessor, is a slightly-better-than-OK mashing of one of history's great literary troves: the Greek myths.
-
Mar 28, 201260It's a mess too, but it's far more defensible as a lazy Sunday lark for those who have just recently outgrown action figures.
-
55It would be a real shame, with this much money and this many effects artists, if there were not a few purely visual wows. Wrath manages exactly two, and not where you might expect.
-
50For those with a burning curiosity to know how "The Lord of the Rings" as directed by Michael Bay might look, Wrath of the Titans provides an idea. This is epic fantasy for teenage boys as only Hollywood can do it: with plenty of grotesque monsters and big explosions replacing characters and narrative.
-
50Wrath of the Titans suggests a franchise that isn't trying very hard, and I don't really expect a sequel. But if it does happen, I fear it'll be even less of an event: "Tiff of the Titans."
-
Mar 29, 201250At least it doesn't take itself too seriously. There are also soldiers, fireballs, smoke and sand. But not much to think about when the dust clears.
-
50This is a movie in which whole sequences consist of nothing but guys fighting stiff computer images. Such scenes would be boring even were they done well, but these scenes aren't done well.
-
50The moments that elevate Wrath above the routine are right in line with Liebesman's "Battle: Los Angeles'' high points: frenetically shot u-r-there combat sequences that feel like the real thing.
-
50Considerably better looking than its predecessor, but it's spewing the same old gibberish.
-
50Wrath of the Titans relentlessly wore me down with special effects so overscale compared to the characters in the film that at times the only thing to do was grin.
-
Mar 31, 201240Wrath at least has the good sense to try to have a little fun with its mince-myth premise. It's better than Clash, but it's still not particularly good.
-
40Bill Nighy and Toby Kebbell liven things up in the supporting cast.
-
40Some of the action sequences, and a few of the performances, are enjoyable enough to make up for the dialogue, which has been upgraded to cheerfully absurd, and the plot, which has been simplified to the point of actual coherence.
-
40All of them slog through countless boring sword-and-sandal skirmishes, none of which feel remotely suspenseful, until the hugeness of it all becomes a mildly passable joke.
-
40The biggest fault is that comparatively little attention is given to the monsters.
-
40This is a relentlessly mechanical piece of work that will not or cannot take the imaginative leaps to yield even fleeting moments of awe, wonder or charm.
-
40If even a tenth of the care and attention lavished on the production design and action sequences had been afforded the script, this could have been an adventure of legendary proportions. As it is, this fizzles whenever anyone opens their mouths.
-
Mar 28, 201240Wrath of the Titans delivers blockbuster bluster with single-minded blandness.
-
Mar 29, 201238Ye gods, there's a lot of hacking and many seismic eruptions in The Wrath of the Titans, the latest 3-D action film that treats the Greek gods as action figures.
-
38Somewhere amid the mind-numbing barrage of action sequences there's a story based on Greek mythology. But its essence is buried amid the clatter.
-
38Rarely has a film so equally balanced macho and nacho, but Wrath does leave us with a few valuable lessons: a.) fratricide is a nasty business, best left to the Greeks and b) fighting fire with fire may sound good, but it turns out to be a really stupid idea.
-
Mar 31, 201230What it lacks are the very elements that made the first movie such a surprise: wit and nerve.
-
Mar 29, 201230The film lacks inspiration or zest in storytelling, performance or action. This is pure product, a movie desperately without energy or enthusiasm of any kind.
-
30I've always said, "If you've seen one god, you've seen them all," and Wrath of the Titans only serves to underscore my point.
-
25This feeble followup to 2010's godawful "Clash of the Titans" sucketh the mighty big one.
-
25Wrath Of The Titans is shopworn and derivative even by the degraded standards of contemporary blockbuster filmmaking.
-
12The only reason you'll feel any wrath is because you shelled out 12 bucks for this steaming bucket of half-baked plot, cliched dialogue and disappointing 3-D special effects.
-
0Made possible by the half a billion dollars Clash of the Titans garnered worldwide, Wrath of the Titans sputters and coughs on the fumes of its own inevitability.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 37 out of 84
-
Mixed: 24 out of 84
-
Negative: 23 out of 84
-
Although it is a bit of an improvement on the first one, it is still the same damn thing.
-
2